Bruddah IZ
DA
Filled with Chinese products.
Ponderable
- Thread starter Bruddah IZ
- Start date
Daniel Miller
SILVER ELITE
1.4 beta, baby!
Daniel Miller
SILVER ELITE
Make an appointment; a cleansing might fix that.
Bruddah IZ
DA
How many stores does Target have?
Bruddah IZ
DA
Source?
Bruddah IZ
DA
It's self cleansing. No appt necessary.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Another one bites the dust.
Kellogg’s is shutting down 39 distribution centers across the country, the embattled cereal giant announced this week.
“While this is the right move for the company to achieve our long-term objectives, it was a difficult decision because of its impact on employees,” company spokesperson Kris Charles said, according to CNYCentral.
The Michigan-based company did not specify how many jobs would be lost during its year-long layoff plan, part of an initiative to shift toward a “highly efficient warehouse model.” Though as many as 1,100 full-time workers could be impacted, given Kellogg’s estimation that an average distribution center employs 30 full-time workers.
Kellogg’s stock saw a decline and its brand perception online took a deep negative nosedive last year following the cereal maker’s politically-driven attack on Breitbart News and its 45 million monthly readers. The company complied with demands from obscure left-wing advocacy groups, who pushed a social media campaign to coerce companies away from advertising on Breitbart.
Daniel Miller
SILVER ELITE
yawn. Sheriff Joe, I notice you provide no link to the article. Could the article be biased about how much influence Breitbart supposedly has on Kelloggs? Where did the article come from? Oh .... well what do you know? It came from Breitbart itself!
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...shutter-39-distribution-centers-layoffs-loom/
Hilarious. Just hilarious.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Not quite as hilarious as Nov 8th, my friend.
Thank you, I needed a new editor, E is always shitting all over himself.
Daniel Miller
SILVER ELITE
Yawn....... Old news, my friend, old news. The only relevant election is the next one.
Could not have said it more clearly.
Thank you
Sheriff Joe
DA
You are helping Mr President Trump and his minions by your actions, thank you.
Maybe if Hillary is still alive by then you can trot her back out for a run.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Oh goody. Sounds like democrats are on a roll. I love the template.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Does anyone remember this?
Sheriff Joe
DA
A MANIAC IS RUNNING OUR FOREIGN POLICY! (IT'S NOT TRUMP)
February 8, 2017
AD FEEDBACK
If only we were able to deport citizens, we could use Trump's new policy of excluding those who are "hostile" toward our country to get rid of Judge James Robart.
Judge Robart's veto of Trump's travel ban notwithstanding, there is not the slightest question but that the president, in his sole discretion, can choose to admit or exclude any foreigners he likes, based on "the interests of the United States.”
The Clinton administration used the executive branch's broad power over immigration to send a 6-year-old boy back to a communist dictatorship. The courts were completely powerless to stop him.
As explained by the federal appellate court that ruled on Elian Gonzalez's asylum application: "It is the duty of the Congress and of the executive branch to exercise political will," and "in no context is the executive branch entitled to more deference than in the context of foreign affairs," which includes immigration.
The court acknowledged that Elian might well be subjected to "re-education," "communist indoctrination" and "political manipulation." (Then again, so would enrolling him at Sidwell Friends.) It didn't matter! Sending little boys back to communist dictatorships was the policy of the Clinton administration.
The Obama administration's immigration policy was to ensure that millions of poverty-stricken foreigners would come here and help turn our country into a Mexican version of Pakistan.
When Arizona merely tried to enforce the federal immigration laws being ignored by the Obama administration, the entire media erupted in rage at this incursion into the majestic power of the president over immigration. They said it was like living in Nazi Germany!
The most reviled section of the act, melodramatically called the "Papers Please" law, was upheld by the Supreme Court. But the other parts, allowing state officials to enforce federal immigration laws, were ruled unconstitutional. A president's policy choice to ignore immigration laws supersedes a state's right to enforce them.
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2017-02-08.html#read_more
February 8, 2017
AD FEEDBACK
If only we were able to deport citizens, we could use Trump's new policy of excluding those who are "hostile" toward our country to get rid of Judge James Robart.
Judge Robart's veto of Trump's travel ban notwithstanding, there is not the slightest question but that the president, in his sole discretion, can choose to admit or exclude any foreigners he likes, based on "the interests of the United States.”
The Clinton administration used the executive branch's broad power over immigration to send a 6-year-old boy back to a communist dictatorship. The courts were completely powerless to stop him.
As explained by the federal appellate court that ruled on Elian Gonzalez's asylum application: "It is the duty of the Congress and of the executive branch to exercise political will," and "in no context is the executive branch entitled to more deference than in the context of foreign affairs," which includes immigration.
The court acknowledged that Elian might well be subjected to "re-education," "communist indoctrination" and "political manipulation." (Then again, so would enrolling him at Sidwell Friends.) It didn't matter! Sending little boys back to communist dictatorships was the policy of the Clinton administration.
The Obama administration's immigration policy was to ensure that millions of poverty-stricken foreigners would come here and help turn our country into a Mexican version of Pakistan.
When Arizona merely tried to enforce the federal immigration laws being ignored by the Obama administration, the entire media erupted in rage at this incursion into the majestic power of the president over immigration. They said it was like living in Nazi Germany!
The most reviled section of the act, melodramatically called the "Papers Please" law, was upheld by the Supreme Court. But the other parts, allowing state officials to enforce federal immigration laws, were ruled unconstitutional. A president's policy choice to ignore immigration laws supersedes a state's right to enforce them.
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2017-02-08.html#read_more
Still clueless Magoo?
Why the question mark?