Judy Garland's ex-husband claims 'Wizard of Oz' munchkins sexually harassed star
Those little fuckers.
Half pints on the rage......

And then there was the Oompa Loompas & Paris Hilton....
Judy Garland's ex-husband claims 'Wizard of Oz' munchkins sexually harassed star
Those little fuckers.
Sounds like a movie title.Half pints on the rage......
![]()
And then there was the Oompa Loompas & Paris Hilton....
Who are you kidding Magoo, that is exactly what you believe.I don't want to believe that all the Republicans in the US Senate are racists, but there actions today are indistinguishable from actions that would be taken by racists in this situation.
Who are you kidding Magoo, that is exactly what you believe.
The only thing they told her was shut the fuck up and sit the fuck down Pocahontas.
So you were just being racist?
So you were just being racist?
Racism is in your head. Make a case for discrimination instead.It seems to me that if a person is nominated for Attorney General, and some citizens have concerns that that person might not be a good choice for the job because of a history of apparently racist actions and statements, those concerns ought to be a topic for debate in the Senate.
However, if that person is himself a Senator, it is not permitted under Senate rules to make any such criticism of him. How convenient.
I don't want to believe that all the Republicans in the US Senate are racists, but there actions today are indistinguishable from actions that would be taken by racists in this situation.
What is racist about that? Didn't she say she was part Injun because that is what her parents told her?So you were just being racist?
I'm not sure what you were trying to insert there.
What is racist about that? Didn't she say she was part Injun because that is what her parents told her?
Racism is in your head. Make a case for discrimination instead.
Mrs. King's letter, that Senator Warren was forbidden to read on the floor of the Senate, was making just such a case about little jeffy.
What's the difference?http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-acti...etta-scott-kings-letter-after-warren-silenced
Sanders, Dems read Coretta Scott King's letter after Warren silenced
If she proves she is an Indian then I am complimenting her, but if she was lying when she made that statement then I am making fun of the lying white whore.Did you mean "Pocahontas" in a complimentary way? Or were you using it like trump does, as a racist insult?
If she proves she is an Indian then I am complimenting her, but if she was lying when she made that statement then I am making fun of the lying white whore.
The problem is that no one ever found evidence to support Warren’s claim that she is part Cherokee and Delaware either. As the Washington Post explained in September 2012, the issue emerged when Warren was running against incumbent Republican senator Scott Brown:
In late April, the Boston Herald reported that in the 1990s, Harvard Law School — where Warren began teaching in 1992 and was granted tenure in 1995 — touted the Democrat’s Native American background as part of an effort to boost its diversity hiring record. Warren’s campaign said she didn’t bring up her heritage before Harvard hired her and that her background came out through later conversations…
… In late May, the Globe reported that Warren acknowledged that at some point after she was hired by Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania, she informed the schools of her Native American heritage. The revelation spurred a new round of questions, since Warren never brought up the fact a month earlier, instead saying she didn’t know why Harvard listed her as Native American. Earlier in the May, a report pointed out that she listed herself as “white” at the University of Texas Law School, prompting questions about consistency.
So you are saying she is a liar?So then you meant it as a racist insult.
So you are saying she is a liar?
I think it is impossible for you to call me racist when I called a white person pocahontas.
Don't you think she would enjoy being called that?