Vaccine

I am pleased at the opportunity to allow you to display your ignorance.

Please continue.
I think you are dealing with failure to launch syndrome. have you figured out if you are a remdesivir fan boy? do you think it should be prescribed? is it ethical for a doctor to prescribe a medicine that is at high risk of presenting other disease down the line? Did the FDA cherry pick the data? Why wasn't normal protocol followed for clearance? Why are so many people not happy with the rollout? Anyway, you get the gist. take another sip and throw another silly statement my way.
 
I think you are dealing with failure to launch syndrome. have you figured out if you are a remdesivir fan boy? do you think it should be prescribed? is it ethical for a doctor to prescribe a medicine that is at high risk of presenting other disease down the line? Did the FDA cherry pick the data? Why wasn't normal protocol followed for clearance? Why are so many people not happy with the rollout? Anyway, you get the gist. take another sip and throw another silly statement my way.
Excellent continuation.
 
The Corporation of America is paying billions of dollars to help small businesses in Ukraine stay open to help the people with goods and services. In my awesome State, most of the small mom & pop biz have been destroyed. Assholes Like Dad thought it was a great idea to force everyone on lockdown, mandate mask or no service, require and mandate every baby, child and adult to take poison jabs or get fired and not allowed to play college soccer and get a free education like the businesses get free handouts in Ukraine. Then this clown told us all to put on another fucking mask and to stand 6 feet away and make sure to always wash your hands. Then the fool told us to take all the boosters and continue to wear a mask. Now the same dumb dumb wants us to take the new jab for the new variant and still wear a mask.
 
I think you are dealing with failure to launch syndrome. have you figured out if you are a remdesivir fan boy? do you think it should be prescribed? is it ethical for a doctor to prescribe a medicine that is at high risk of presenting other disease down the line? Did the FDA cherry pick the data? Why wasn't normal protocol followed for clearance? Why are so many people not happy with the rollout? Anyway, you get the gist. take another sip and throw another silly statement my way.
Yeah, the FDA's track record is far from exemplary, there is a laundry list of drugs that they have approved that have turned out to be deadly. The doctors on the front line are far more reliable than the FDA. The FDA relies on the studies of the drug producers, whereas, doctors rely on the actual use and treatment of medications on real patients. (although I'd still get multiple opinions). FDA approval is only step one in determining if a drug is safe and effective, its far from the final conclusion.
 
it's easier to just admit that you just don't know. Regurgitation can only work for so long. Original thought, analysis, and assessment may not be your thing. Answering questions and taking a position would be a start.
How does one argue with nonsense other than pointing out that it is nonsense?
 
How does one argue with nonsense other than pointing out that it is nonsense?
So you are ok with everything I mentioned and choose to answer with a non answer... makes sense to me..I'm beginning to think you are a russian trumpy bot tasked with disrupting soccer forums by talking about nothing.
 
So you are ok with everything I mentioned and choose to answer with a non answer... makes sense to me..I'm beginning to think you are a russian trumpy bot tasked with disrupting soccer forums by talking about nothing.
You have a logically defective habit of arguing with me about things I never posted.
 
Back
Top