Today in Fascism

And it's totally illegal what Biden did.
A judge is going to block this very
quick and poof, once again Joe Sniffer Biden
is made the FOOL.

Only Congress can do what he " Claims " he
did to BUY LIBERAL VOTES.
 
This is what Barr should be prosecuted for ?

DoJ releases memo sent to Bill Barr saying Donald Trump should not be charged with obstruction
Rob Crilly, Senior U.S. Political Reporter For Dailymail.Com and Associated Press - Yesterday 5:27 PM

The Justice Department on Wednesday released the unredacted 2019 memo that concluded nothing President Donald Trump did - including firing the FBI director - amounted to obstruction of justice or warranted a prosecution in relation to the Mueller investigation.

Even without constitutional barriers to charging a president, it says, there is no case to answer...

...The nine-page memo, prepared for then-Attorney General William Barr by a pair of senior Justice Department officials, offered a legal analysis on whether Trump had criminally obstructed the investigation into potential ties between Russia and his 2016 presidential campaign.


Though the decision to clear Trump of obstruction has been well-documented, the newly disclosed memo offers additional details about how two of the department's senior-most leaders arrived at that conclusion...


DoJ releases memo sent to Bill Barr saying Donald Trump should not be charged with obstruction (msn.com)
And now that all the redacted part of the initial Muellefr report have been disclosed, the political machinations of that opinion have been revealed. If t had been re-elected, Barr would still be in the clear. Since he was not, it was only a matter of time until the full magnitude of his offense became evident, perhaps not for decades after Barr's death. Someday, however, the truth would be known.

Welcome to that someday.
 
Last edited:
And now that all the redacted part of the initial Muellefr report have been disclosed, the political machinations of that opinion have been revealed. If t had been re-elected, Barr would still be in the clear. Since he was not, it was only a matter of time until the full magnitude of his offense became evident, perhaps not for decades after Barr's death. Someday, however, the truth would be known.

Welcome to that someday.

Wow...Do you speak ( Type ) with a twisted tongue ( Finger ).

Ya Freak.
 
And now that all the redacted part of the initial Muellefr report have been disclosed, the political machinations of that opinion have been revealed. If t had been re-elected, Barr would still be in the clear. Since he was not, it was only a matter of time until the full magnitude of his offense became evident, perhaps not for decades after Barr's death. Someday, however, the truth would be known.

Welcome to that someday.
Another moist dream Magoo?
 
Facts and speculation are not the same...but you know that.
The facts are now open for e everyone to see for themselves. If you choose to remain ignorant., there is nothing I can do to help you.

I recall Mueller's comments when Barr first published his opinion, saying that Barr twisted the facts. Now we can all see how.
 
The facts are now open for e everyone to see for themselves. If you choose to remain ignorant., there is nothing I can do to help you.

I recall Mueller's comments when Barr first published his opinion, saying that Barr twisted the facts. Now we can all see how.
I can read the same facts as you Magoo...perhaps it is you who is judgmentally the ignorant one...
I don't think anything regarding Mueller and/or Barr will happen...Barr didn't craft the memo, staff did.
It's your wet dream not mine...
 
I can read the same facts as you Magoo...perhaps it is you who is judgmentally the ignorant one...
I don't think anything regarding Mueller and/or Barr will happen...Barr didn't craft the memo, staff did.
It's your wet dream not mine...
I will rashly assume that you have never worked on the staff of a powerful man.
 
BW: Do you have any regrets about how you handled the Mueller report?

AG BARR: No, I don’t. I would do exactly the same as I did. People have to understand that Mueller threw this hot potato into the political process and the body politic.

BW: Why did Mueller handle it the way that he did?

AG BARR: I don’t think he was on top of his game. I think he made some very serious errors. The whole reason Rod Rosenstein brought him in is to have someone authoritative deal with it. Once this issue was raised, it was important to have someone speak to the country and tell them what he had found.

But he goes out and hires partisan Democrats to make up his investigative team, which means half the country is going to be suspicious from the very beginning. That defeated the whole purpose of naming him. I think it was pretty evident within a few months of his taking the position that there had been no collusion. But instead of stopping it at that point and letting the country move on, he took two instances that clearly were not obstruction and which even his final report doesn’t try to argue were obstruction.

I asked him, when you give me the report, you have to sanitize it. I’m in a position to release it as soon as you give it to me because I can make it public under the law. If there’s a delay, a lot of damage can be done to the country, the stock market, and our foreign adversaries. People are going to wonder if the president's going to jail. So you have to give it to me in a form in which I can release it.

BW: Redacted it, in other words.

AG BARR: Right. Redacted.

BW: Did he say he would?

AG BARR: Yes, he said he understood. I said that this was the most important thing as far as I was concerned. Not having a delay between the time I receive it and the time I can let it go. And lo and behold, they show up with a report with no redactions in it. Instead, on the top of every page, it cannot be released with the grand jury material.

BW: Do you think that the reason that was done was so the egg would be on your face?

AG BARR: I don’t know why it was done. It was inexplicable to me. They knew very well what I needed. While I took three weeks to redact the report, I had to tell people what the bottom line was: That there was going to be no indictment of the president and, therefore, there was no collusion. I said that he didn’t reach a decision on obstruction. I said while he didn’t find obstruction, he didn’t exonerate him either. However, based on the report, I explained why I didn’t find obstruction. Half the letter is me explaining my decision—not Mueller’s decision. I thought that was the responsible thing to do. People who are acting in good faith can scour that letter and not see anything misleading in it.

The other thing I haven’t really understood is this: If the stuff was so damaging, why didn't Congress impeach him at that point? There were crickets. I think the idea that I affected the decision by summarizing the report was the left-wing throwing a tantrum because Mueller didn’t deliver the goods as far as they were concerned.

BW: If the firing of F.B.I. Director James Comey wasn’t obstruction, how would you describe it? Do you think that it was unwise?

AG BARR: I would describe it as something that should have happened long before. Everyone I knew in Republican and Justice Department circles, including me, was advising Trump at the very beginning of his administration to fire Comey before we even knew his role in Russiagate. It’s because Comey, in my opinion, has some of the personality characteristics that can lead people, like J. Edgar Hoover, to run the F.B.I. according to their personal whims. I thought it was dangerous and that he should go.

BW: But Trump did it at the height of the Mueller investigation. Do you think that it was unwise to do so then?

AG BARR: Better late than never, I thought. I’m not sure there ever would have been a good time once Mueller was named and got going.
 
BW: Do you have any regrets about how you handled the Mueller report?

AG BARR: No, I don’t. I would do exactly the same as I did. People have to understand that Mueller threw this hot potato into the political process and the body politic.

BW: Why did Mueller handle it the way that he did?

AG BARR: I don’t think he was on top of his game. I think he made some very serious errors. The whole reason Rod Rosenstein brought him in is to have someone authoritative deal with it. Once this issue was raised, it was important to have someone speak to the country and tell them what he had found.

But he goes out and hires partisan Democrats to make up his investigative team, which means half the country is going to be suspicious from the very beginning. That defeated the whole purpose of naming him. I think it was pretty evident within a few months of his taking the position that there had been no collusion. But instead of stopping it at that point and letting the country move on, he took two instances that clearly were not obstruction and which even his final report doesn’t try to argue were obstruction.

I asked him, when you give me the report, you have to sanitize it. I’m in a position to release it as soon as you give it to me because I can make it public under the law. If there’s a delay, a lot of damage can be done to the country, the stock market, and our foreign adversaries. People are going to wonder if the president's going to jail. So you have to give it to me in a form in which I can release it.

BW: Redacted it, in other words.

AG BARR: Right. Redacted.

BW: Did he say he would?

AG BARR: Yes, he said he understood. I said that this was the most important thing as far as I was concerned. Not having a delay between the time I receive it and the time I can let it go. And lo and behold, they show up with a report with no redactions in it. Instead, on the top of every page, it cannot be released with the grand jury material.

BW: Do you think that the reason that was done was so the egg would be on your face?

AG BARR: I don’t know why it was done. It was inexplicable to me. They knew very well what I needed. While I took three weeks to redact the report, I had to tell people what the bottom line was: That there was going to be no indictment of the president and, therefore, there was no collusion. I said that he didn’t reach a decision on obstruction. I said while he didn’t find obstruction, he didn’t exonerate him either. However, based on the report, I explained why I didn’t find obstruction. Half the letter is me explaining my decision—not Mueller’s decision. I thought that was the responsible thing to do. People who are acting in good faith can scour that letter and not see anything misleading in it.

The other thing I haven’t really understood is this: If the stuff was so damaging, why didn't Congress impeach him at that point? There were crickets. I think the idea that I affected the decision by summarizing the report was the left-wing throwing a tantrum because Mueller didn’t deliver the goods as far as they were concerned.

BW: If the firing of F.B.I. Director James Comey wasn’t obstruction, how would you describe it? Do you think that it was unwise?

AG BARR: I would describe it as something that should have happened long before. Everyone I knew in Republican and Justice Department circles, including me, was advising Trump at the very beginning of his administration to fire Comey before we even knew his role in Russiagate. It’s because Comey, in my opinion, has some of the personality characteristics that can lead people, like J. Edgar Hoover, to run the F.B.I. according to their personal whims. I thought it was dangerous and that he should go.

BW: But Trump did it at the height of the Mueller investigation. Do you think that it was unwise to do so then?

AG BARR: Better late than never, I thought. I’m not sure there ever would have been a good time once Mueller was named and got going.
Can you pick out all of Barr's lies in that pitiful response?
 
The facts are now open for e everyone to see for themselves. If you choose to remain ignorant., there is nothing I can do to help you.

I recall Mueller's comments when Barr first published his opinion, saying that Barr twisted the facts. Now we can all see how.

Mueller the Drunk
Barr the _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Obama the Bath House King
Clinton the walking disease
Bush the Corrupt Deceit 9/11
Biden the " Inappropriate " sicko
Schumer the Lecherous
Pelosi the Mafia Queen
McTurtle the Swindler
McCarthy the Puss
And on and on and on.....

One BIG happy family of incestuous Political
dealings rotting before the publics very eyes.

Oh.....Adam " Espola " Schiff THE LIAR !
 
Back
Top