WhooshCouldn't have anything to do with the WNT going with the woke garbage, right? Maybe put the focus back on soccer and respecting ones country.
WhooshCouldn't have anything to do with the WNT going with the woke garbage, right? Maybe put the focus back on soccer and respecting ones country.
Define a Flight 2 league? Are DPL and ECNL_RL flight 2 leagues?You say that the perception of being "elite" is important to parents. I agree. But if a Club is sucked into that mentality, then the Club is wrong. A Club should strive for excellence; not perception. Unfortunately, the Elite 64 league is a Flight 2 league. I'm not saying the league is a joke, and it might improve over time. But right now, if Truth in Advertising laws applied, it would rechristened as the "Mediocre 64."
Which brings me to the vests, which we both agree is a marketing gimmick. If it were me, I'd ask for the free toaster instead.
Couldn't have anything to do with the WNT going with the woke garbage, right? Maybe put the focus back on soccer and respecting ones country.
Those stupid vests should only be put on those who want them to get better or for pros getting paid. The first year of GDA they had this and I heard numerous stories of girls being shamed with the vests. I can hear a coach now say, "Hey Girl, if you dont start running more, I'm going to send this to all the college coaches. Wow, this is starting to all sound weird again and just controlling. What happen to just playing for the love of the game.
You are quite the little liar. I have never in my life told a college girls soccer coach to "F" off. You're slandering me GG. I never ever called a DOC for a free handout, ever. That is a lie. They all called me and made the offers. I will have my attorney PM you.telling everyone here and also college coaches to f**k off
Maybe it died the first of many times that you club shopped for free handouts.
You are quite the little liar. I have never in my life told a college girls soccer coach to "F" off. You're slandering me GG. I never ever called a DOC for a free handout, ever. That is a lie. They all called me and made the offers. I will have my attorney PM you.
When people here say "Flight 2" they are referring to SoCal Soccer League's second tier division, called "Flight 2."\Define a Flight 2 league? Are DPL and ECNL_RL flight 2 leagues?
The only person who doesn't respect their country is you. You're the one who has spent the last eight years actively hoping the "woke" WNT would lose and feeling sorry for yourself that it has been on its greatest run of dominance in the entire history of the sport. Neither you nor your other bigot friends were able to stop them despite your best efforts. Only old age has been able to stop the purple haired women who has been in your head the last decade.
Whoosh
Sounds a lot like a "Super Double Secret Elite Champions" league.Well, After reading through some rhetoric, lol. I’ll go back to the original question(s).
Elite 64 will have a 2 part season schedule similar to ECNL. This will be in place of whatever league said teams are currently playing. It will also include 2-3 showcases that follow the NL Pro league series. Like ECNL and other similar leagues this is a Club league not a team league so involved Clubs will have to field a team for every age group and clubs will play one another the whole game day again like ECNL. Some clubs will have both boys and girls accepted in while some Might only have one side. It’ll be 8 clubs for each gender in the new Southern Cal division. For example clubs like SLAMMERS, Blues, Legends, ect (not saying those clubs are in) that have ECNL for example this would be their next best team. So it would basically be ECNL, ECNL-RL then Elite 64. Similar with MLS those teams would stay there for those clubs it would be they’re next up. Some clubs might be pulling their EA squads so could be those teams for some of those clubs. As I mentioned above for most it would Likely be their top Discovery NPL team or comparable. There might be a few clubs that get in that currently have no “Elite League” status like LASC who appears to be one already. Clubs like Strikers who just lost ECNL might move one of those teams into there ? Besides good competition Some selling points I hear they’re throwing out are detailed stat keeping system for stuff like goals, assist, saves and all that jazz for every player, which look at all the hoopla in the other threads here about the YSR ranking system and tell me people wouldn’t love that $h”t. Open rosters so clubs can have unlimited guest players to field top teams (although most clubs would just have designated teams but able to player pass freely). And some playoff pathways through the NL league system. Short story long it’s gonna pull mostly the top couple Discovery teams and a handful from maybe EA/GA/DPL. ECNL and MLS Next still sit on top.
Good info and helpful to understand the potential E64 landscape.Well, After reading through some rhetoric, lol. I’ll go back to the original question(s).
Elite 64 will have a 2 part season schedule similar to ECNL. This will be in place of whatever league said teams are currently playing. It will also include 2-3 showcases that follow the NL Pro league series. Like ECNL and other similar leagues this is a Club league not a team league so involved Clubs will have to field a team for every age group and clubs will play one another the whole game day again like ECNL. Some clubs will have both boys and girls accepted in while some Might only have one side. It’ll be 8 clubs for each gender in the new Southern Cal division. For example clubs like SLAMMERS, Blues, Legends, ect (not saying those clubs are in) that have ECNL for example this would be their next best team. So it would basically be ECNL, ECNL-RL then Elite 64. Similar with MLS those teams would stay there for those clubs it would be they’re next up. Some clubs might be pulling their EA squads so could be those teams for some of those clubs. As I mentioned above for most it would Likely be their top Discovery NPL team or comparable. There might be a few clubs that get in that currently have no “Elite League” status like LASC who appears to be one already. Clubs like Strikers who just lost ECNL might move one of those teams into there ? Besides good competition Some selling points I hear they’re throwing out are detailed stat keeping system for stuff like goals, assist, saves and all that jazz for every player, which look at all the hoopla in the other threads here about the YSR ranking system and tell me people wouldn’t love that $h”t. Open rosters so clubs can have unlimited guest players to field top teams (although most clubs would just have designated teams but able to player pass freely). And some playoff pathways through the NL league system. Short story long it’s gonna pull mostly the top couple Discovery teams and a handful from maybe EA/GA/DPL. ECNL and MLS Next still sit on top.
Not sure if I agree with your assessment "ECNL, ECRL, GA, DPL, Elite 64, Local League Flight 1".I hope this league works out for the players who just want a chance to compete and are locked out of the ECNL and GA clubs. But, I’m very skeptical of what is being sold to everybody. My perspective is from the Girls side, so the Boys may be different. I don't see how a league that is going to be comprised primarily of teams that played at the Discovery League NPL (SOCAL Flight 1 teams who play other Flight 1 team from a different region of SOCAL, instead of the Flight 1 teams in their own area), is suddenly going to have stronger base of teams than the GA or DPL. If most of the clubs currently playing GA and DPL don’t make the move to Elite 64, certainly Elite 64 can’t spontaneously be at a higher level than GA. US Youth Soccer (former Development Academy now GA) was competing with US Club Soccer (ECNL) for the top league status. There are endless debates on the forums about who was better, but it’s a moot point now, because the DA folded up in 2020. The top players all migrated to the ECNL. Then US Youth Soccer rebrands the DA with a few new rules in 2021 (now allows player to play in High School), calling its new league Girls Academy (GA/DA 2.0) hoping to regain the players it lost. Most ECNL players and clubs stay in the ECNL. Currently the GA is struggling on the West Coast and showing signs of decline on the East Coast because the clubs and ECNL players are not coming back. Now US Youth Soccer starts yet another league (Elite 64), that is going to be at a higher level than GA, while the GA still exists…how? It doesn’t make any logical sense. The only way Elite 64 will be better than GA is if US Youth Soccer shuts down GA, which may be why the Elite 64 (DA 3.0) is being created. If GA is still around this Fall, then the pecking order will be ECNL, ECRL, GA, DPL, Elite 64, Local League Flight 1 (whatever cool sounding name they call it this year). Elite 64 is US Youth Soccer’s attempt to take a piece of the local leagues’ revenue, by creating a travel league for teams that don’t need to travel to find competitive teams to play. Why else would you create three “top” leagues (GA, DPL, Elite 64) that are competing against each other for players, if you are trying to compete with US Club Soccer’s ECNL and ECRL.
Not sure if I agree with your assessment "ECNL, ECRL, GA, DPL, Elite 64, Local League Flight 1".
In Socal you do have a lot of teams playing in ECNL that are very good. But it's not like that everywhere. Also, Many of the top team clubs tend to put all their resources into ECNL only (ECRL is a holding tank but not focused on). This is what allows GA, DPL, etc to continue to hang around.
As a parent would you choose the 2nd team of a top club or the 1st team of a close to top club? In the end 99.9% chance it won't matter so you might as well pick whichever club is closer.
I hope this league works out for the players who just want a chance to compete and are locked out of the ECNL and GA clubs. But, I’m very skeptical of what is being sold to everybody. My perspective is from the Girls side, so the Boys may be different. I don't see how a league that is going to be comprised primarily of teams that played at the Discovery League NPL (SOCAL Flight 1 teams who play other Flight 1 team from a different region of SOCAL, instead of the Flight 1 teams in their own area), is suddenly going to have stronger base of teams than the GA or DPL. If most of the clubs currently playing GA and DPL don’t make the move to Elite 64, certainly Elite 64 can’t spontaneously be at a higher level than GA. US Youth Soccer (former Development Academy now GA) was competing with US Club Soccer (ECNL) for the top league status. There are endless debates on the forums about who was better, but it’s a moot point now, because the DA folded up in 2020. The top players all migrated to the ECNL. Then US Youth Soccer rebrands the DA with a few new rules in 2021 (now allows player to play in High School), calling its new league Girls Academy (GA/DA 2.0) hoping to regain the players it lost. Most ECNL players and clubs stay in the ECNL. Currently the GA is struggling on the West Coast and showing signs of decline on the East Coast because the clubs and ECNL players are not coming back. Now US Youth Soccer starts yet another league (Elite 64), that is going to be at a higher level than GA, while the GA still exists…how? It doesn’t make any logical sense. The only way Elite 64 will be better than GA is if US Youth Soccer shuts down GA, which may be why the Elite 64 (DA 3.0) is being created. If GA is still around this Fall, then the pecking order will be ECNL, ECRL, GA, DPL, Elite 64, Local League Flight 1 (whatever cool sounding name they call it this year). Elite 64 is US Youth Soccer’s attempt to take a piece of the local leagues’ revenue, by creating a travel league for teams that don’t need to travel to find competitive teams to play. Why else would you create three “top” leagues (GA, DPL, Elite 64) that are competing against each other for players, if you are trying to compete with US Club Soccer’s ECNL and ECRL.
Aside from this league or that league all that really matters is are the games competitive? Pick any of these "Elite" levels/leagues and chances are the answer is yes. The people arguing that all we need is Gold, Bronze and Silver don't have a case. Go to that format and you'll have blowouts unless you kick a couple thousand kids out all together. which some would argue for too. If its consistently close competitive games then more power to them.
Far as Pecking order your partially correct with the big exception that no club has all those options you listed so not like its a clubs 4th or 5th tier. On the Girls side ECNL is on their own planet and 90% of RL teams are better than anything GA or DPL has. Now if you look at the Clubs that have ECNL and point to their 3rd teams or in slammers case 5th teams those teams I would say are also better than what's in GA or DPL. looking at Blues, Slammers, Legends, Beach maybe Strikers in some age groups I would Say their best teams that are not any ECNL would be atop the standings in GA or DPL. But to one of your points I think you might see some clubs also possibly pull out of those leagues and opt for the E64 route. As watered down as Discovery is if you look at the top 1-2 places in most age groups I'd bet on those teams over what's in GA and DPL. From a national standpoint the E64 league has already picked up some top clubs across the country and if it gets a handful from SoCal it'll help raise that bar a little more.
Ok, this the most helpful post I've ever read on this list....thanks for the insightful comments!You are correct, I am only focused on the SoCal area, and not other regions of the country in my perspective. Honestly, if I was picking between a 2nd team top club and 1st team close team, my focus would be on how my DD fits into the teams Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs) on the field. Performance Cusp Models in sports psychology find the most efficient development occurs when an athlete’s rate of success, when performing at their best, is at 50-70%. What I mean is that when an athlete is placed in a challenging environment, where even their best performance with no mistakes will only find success 50-70% of the time, they will develop and grow faster than any other situation. It is hard to judge that scenario in soccer, because the challenge and performance of the individual is dependent upon the team. I would attempt to judge where your players KSAs fall in relation to the rest of the team, when they are giving 100%. If you want your athlete to develop as efficiently as possible, they should be somewhere in the 50-70% on the team. Any lower and they become discouraged and/or frustrated and begin to develop learned helplessness over time; any higher and it is too easy for them, they do not develop learned industriousness that will be needed as they face more challenging competition as they grow. The only reason I would be content with my DD playing on a team where she was in the 80-100 percentile of KSAs on the team, is if there was no better team available for her to play on. Finding the team that is just right for the player is easier said than done, but I wouldn't let a team’s ranking order at a club, or the clubs clout determine where they should play. If you can find the 50-70% sweet spot for your DD, and the coach is good, I would go with it.
In SoCal, I don't believe this is true at this point. With an exception here or there for a strong GA team that been able to retain their players, I think you will find that ECNL teams in SoCal are better than GA teams across the board. There is certainly more of a debate when you compared ECRL teams to GA teams, but there is no way that GA teams in SoCal are "better than most RL teams". I'd still put my kid in GA over ECRL, but only because I think the exposure to college coaches at events is better (not because the competition is better).I know quite a few GA teams are as good as many ECNL teams and definitely better then most RL teams.
This is where the GA will continue to demonstrate "value". Of course the better teams are in ECNL, hard to change that. Parents are more concerend about how "good" the leagues than college coaches. There are roster spots for almost every player who wants one. The GAs infrastructure is good, their leadership is respected, and they have established the fact that their showcases are well run. Plenty of coaches show up to them. They continue to expand. Not every player is going to play at a P5 conference, a Santa Clara, etc. There is plenty of room for two "top" leagues. They will let the parents argue over which one is best. Your DDs first day on the pitch in college isn't going to be spent comparing leagues.II'd still put my kid in GA over ECRL, but only because I think the exposure to college coaches at events is better (not because the competition is better).