4 way Participation Champions are the best kind.They are doing a 4 way Co-Champion for the u/13 group. It will not be rescheduled.
4 way Participation Champions are the best kind.They are doing a 4 way Co-Champion for the u/13 group. It will not be rescheduled.
I'm curious why this is the case? It seems like at the younger age groups the SW has always been very dominate but as the teams age, it is not the case? For example the 07 age group has 3 dominate teams competing but a few years ago you could have said the same for the 04 age group. These kids may bounce around but the talent typically stays on SW/So Cal. Is it more about the team vs the althlete as they get older? Are some top 04 kid's already college bound and focused elsewhere?And a few other observations.
The SW division this year doesn't seem to be as strong as in others. I refer across all age groups (with the exception of one of the younger groups).
The club that has performed the best in the part of the playoffs that count (Champions) is LAFC.
Do you have kids who play or are you just on here to kill time? Wtf is a high school senior team? Players, legit players who are already in college or going to college in 3-6 weeks are either playing WPSL, UWS, or training on their own on doing their college packet. This BS wack ass club and their clown show doc pulled this because he don’t care about anyone other than himself. There are 04’s on this roster! In addition there are other 05,04 players back at home not on roster who could of been added, who could of played in this in order to be seen rather than some kids who wanted a vacation and to play with their old friends. At this point ANY GAMES ARE GOOD GAMES. Lots of kids who btw have paid thousands of dollars in fees to this club just need to be seen. And to your last point as to why the club wouldn’t let them go? Are you serious? Here’s a short answer. Cause people who run clubs and coach them are dicks. That’s why.
I don't have any idea as to why.I'm curious why this is the case? It seems like at the younger age groups the SW has always been very dominate but as the teams age, it is not the case? For example the 07 age group has 3 dominate teams competing but a few years ago you could have said the same for the 04 age group. These kids may bounce around but the talent typically stays on SW/So Cal. Is it more about the team vs the althlete as they get older? Are some top 04 kid's already college bound and focused elsewhere?
The Surf 04 team was ravaged with injuries to many key players. Losing 3 Power 5 D1 payers isn’t easy to replace.I don't have any idea as to why.
I may be wrong, but I think with the exception of Surf, there was really no WPSL or UWS in SoCal this year.
What teams were playing this summer in socal?Yep, you couldn't be more wrong.
They are doing a 4 way Co-Champion for the u/13 group. It will not be rescheduled.
Yep, you couldn't be more wrong.
A VERY common theme amongst the teams I know that went. We had 3 players not make the trip due to injury and 4 playing with injuries. Coach did a great job managing their minutes but it definitely made things more “interesting” as most of the injuries were to defensive players.The Surf 04 team was ravaged with injuries to many key players. Losing 3 Power 5 D1 payers isn’t easy to replace.
Are any results in for the U15 Champions Cup? I don't see scores for today's games.
In the past ECNL started at U14 so they didn't even have a U13 age at all.There was plenty of field space this morning. Why ECNL didn't have the U13s at least play the semifinals is a bizarre decision.
I guess naming all four Co-Champs is better than just ignoring the age group (like they did this week in Florida and then again by not sending them to Virginia).
Doesn’t look like any scores were posted from today. Wanted to see who made the final 4 for the 2007 group.
It was fun for the 2 games. But it was a waste of money to be honest. I say don't have u13 age at all if they will be the bottom priority of the playoff.There was plenty of field space this morning. Why ECNL didn't have the U13s at least play the semifinals is a bizarre decision.
I guess naming all four Co-Champs is better than just ignoring the age group (like they did this week in Florida and then again by not sending them to Virginia).
Of course in a playoff/showcase setting with college coaches the youngest ages are the least priority.I say don't have u13 age at all if they will be the bottom priority of the playoff.
Agree 100% on that point. The youngers did have a few people watch on the scouting side. Another positive was my kid was able to get a day 3 article about her and her teams performance. So we as family did get something out of it for her.Of course in a playoff/showcase setting with college coaches the youngest ages are the least priority.
When my DD started at the youngest ages you didn't see many coaches out there looking. A few. A vast contrast vs the sidelines on the older groups.
In this case? Weather happened. Out of their control. So they prioritize the ages that are actually getting recruited. It sucks they only got in a couple of games though. You always want to see your kid play as much as possible.
Wondering...how was GA allowed to set up a national tournament last week in Oceanside? They were able to pull it off.
Doesn’t look like any scores were posted from today. Wanted to see who made the final 4 for the 2007 group.