You’re welcome to post a coherent definition if whatever you believe CRT means in a schools context.Dr. McIntosh's paper is over 30 years old. Is that what you mean by CRT, in the current time frame?
Who is the "they" that wants to advance the "what" in which schools?
You’re welcome to post a coherent definition if whatever you believe CRT means in a schools context.
So far, the winning definition seems to be “making sure those white kids learn to check their privilege”. If you have a better definition, get it out there.
I’ll let the General enlighten the class
Learning how we got where we are. Not anything too earth shattering, unless of course it makes one self-conscious.If that is the definition you are working with, I can understand why you are upset.
The original authors of studies of CRT define it more like a study of how centuries of institutionalized racism are still remnant in current, laws, social norms, and economic interests.
The age of intentional ignorance and the demeaning of knowledge. They beat on cops, demonize judges and belittle military leaders. Law and order?Tucker Carlson laughs this off with "He's not just a pig. He's stupid."
Tucker's stupid pig has degrees or certificates from Princeton, Columbia, MIT, Naval War College, and Army Airborne School.
Famous nature photographer Ansel Adams was assigned to take pictures at Manzanar. The Library of Congress has a display of them online here --
Search Results: "" - Prints & Photographs Online Catalog (Library of Congress)
The Prints and Photographs Online Catalog (PPOC) contains catalog records and digital images representing a rich cross-section of still pictures held by the Prints & Photographs Division and, in some cases, other units of the...www.loc.gov
Adams published a book of the photographs available on Amazon or city libraries --
https://sandiego.bibliocommons.com/item/show/683038161
If you want words from the original authors, I think pup provided some. They did not do much to win me over.If that is the definition you are working with, I can understand why you are upset.
The original authors of studies of CRT define it more like a study of how centuries of institutionalized racism are still remnant in current, laws, social norms, and economic interests.
I'm dying to read what Mr. Marx response will be......lol! If you add "spiritual" before realm, then you can go down the rabbit hole and see the truth of Good vs Evil. Happy Sunday Dad of 4 and God Bless you and Espola and his wife of some 35 yearsIf you want words from the original authors, I think pup provided some. They did not do much to win me over.
It makes more sense to me to do a better job teaching the history of slavery and segregation, both domestic and internationally.
But, when your middle and high school classes begin arguing about current situations and policies, then you need a real diversity of opinion. Otherwise, you have ceased to educate and you have moved into the realm of indoctrination.
If you want words from the original authors, I think pup provided some. They did not do much to win me over.
It makes more sense to me to do a better job teaching the history of slavery and segregation, both domestic and internationally.
But, when your middle and high school classes begin arguing about current situations and policies, then you need a real diversity of opinion. Otherwise, you have ceased to educate and you have moved into the realm of indoctrination.
It just means any decent current events discussion needs a mix of conservative and liberal voices.I have no idea what that means.
It just means any decent current events discussion needs a mix of conservative and liberal voices.
"Todays political and social system is the result of historic racism" is a perfectly valid liberal point. It can be the start of a good discussion, if opposing viewpoints are included and welcomed.
If other viewpoints are discouraged, it can be the signal that warns others to stay quiet, for fear of being called racist.
Ha, sound familiar. close your eyes tightly and think about education VS indoctrination. It's pretty simple.I have no idea what that means.
Ha, sound familiar. close your eyes tightly and think about education VS indoctrination. It's pretty simple.
What would you say in opposition to that point?
Will there be a fact checker on site?It just means any decent current events discussion needs a mix of conservative and liberal voices.
"Todays political and social system is the result of historic racism" is a perfectly valid liberal point. It can be the start of a good discussion, if opposing viewpoints are included and welcomed.
If other viewpoints are discouraged, it can be the signal that warns others to stay quiet, for fear of being called racist.
The main reason many “conservative speakers” have been shunned is their propensity for fabrication and manipulation of data and reality resulting in their own set of “alternative facts”.Will there be a fact checker on site?
Nothing to add here except Tucker Carlson is a complete shit stain- no, actually- he's the fly that eats the shit.
I'd love to see Tucker in a room, alone, with the General and a few of his men. We'll see how tough ol' shit stain is.