Bruddah IZ
DA
And no Ice!!!
And no Ice!!!
Isn’t there already an ongoing investigation?
That doesn't count. They need a "politicized investigation" to fire up the sheep.Isn’t there already an ongoing investigation?
I don’t see that as a good thing. GOP needs a fresh new face.
I'm not necessarily opposed to a bi-partisan investigation (if that's even possible), but I do find it odd that we're having the investigation after the trial. Typically it works the other way around, but hey its DC.Isn’t there already an ongoing investigation?
You know that's not the case. As constructed this would have been as bi-partisan as you get in the US, as agreed in the House and why 35 GOPers voted for it there. A direct attack on the seat of our democracy as it undertook one of the most fundamental constitutional tasks which resulted in multiple deaths and you think some criminal investigations should sort that out, really?That doesn't count. They need a "politicized investigation" to fire up the sheep.
Depends. Fresh faces come with the same old politics.I don’t see that as a good thing. GOP needs a fresh new face.
You know that's not the case. As constructed this would have been as bi-partisan as you get in the US, as agreed in the House and why 35 GOPers voted for it there. A direct attack on the seat of our democracy as it undertook one of the most fundamental constitutional tasks which resulted in multiple deaths and you think some criminal investigations should sort that out, really?
What will now happen is that the Dems will create a House committee like the GOP Benghazi constructed joke that was purely for partisan gain. That's not helpful and a waste of time & money.
Meh! Small advantage not even worth mentioning.If that proposed House investigative committee finds some real meat, that may or may not help with the DOJ proceedings, depending on whether they follow evidence rules properly and don't give key witnesses golden tickets as they did with Ollie North.
One advantage a House committee will have over the DOJ is that they won't need to get a judge to sign off on subpoenas.
“The reason he was there is because he was a dumbass and believed what he heard on Fox News.” —Joseph Hurley, a lawyer representing an alleged Capitol rioter, Anthony Antonio, tells Associated Press he is one of many attorneys using misinformation as a defense. |
Then of course only a trumpy-ass faux news viewer would/could simultaneously say that’s a great defense and then turn faux on and say “HELL YEAH!!! They got the inside scoop!”
“The reason he was there is because he was a dumbass and believed what he heard on Fox News.”
—Joseph Hurley, a lawyer representing an alleged Capitol rioter, Anthony Antonio, tells Associated Press he is one of many attorneys using misinformation as a defense.
Then of course only a trumpy-ass faux news viewer would/could simultaneously say that’s a great defense and then turn faux on and say “HELL YEAH!!! They got the inside scoop!”