Are you advocating for high density low income housing in the Bay Area? We can look at Harlem, south side Chicago, S.E. Washington D.C., Compton, The Jungle (LA), sobrainty park & the 6-9 village in East Oakland, and last but not least North Richmond to realize high density low income housing is a failed policy of the past. The traffic would also get worse.
So when my daughter and I came back to the Bay Area for Covid, we watched Coach Carter. After the movie, she asked me was I like Coach Carter and I said NO because I don’t go to Richmond anymore. Then she asked why and I didn’t want to tell her but I felt guilty. So, I decided to go to the hood and check in. I was surprised to see that North Richmond is no more. All of the low income housing is boarded up and empty now as we speak. My research indicates many of the residents were bribed/offered new houses in Henderson, NV and accepted. The crime rate will definitely be going up in Henderson soon if it hasn’t happened already. I’d be pissed if I had purchased a McMansion at market value in Henderson.
So let the tech companies come to Vallejo. The fancy folks can live in Vallejo, Napa, Sonoma, or Petaluma. The lower income folks can stay in Fairfield, Vacaville, and Dixon with about a 15-40 minute commute back to Vallejo for their tech job. The North Bay needs tech and tech needs the North Bay. I am surprised it hasn’t happened yet.
Also, in Bay Area 100k is almost low income. I have helped some disabled vets get housing at the affordable housing condos (as opposed to low income) the Warriors had to build to get approval for their stadium on the Embarcadero. It seems affordable housing in San Francisco and Berkeley are targeting teachers and disabled vets only so not sure more affordable housing is gonna help young couples if they aren’t educators.