What was the judicial penalty given to Joe Biden’s son? Please let me know.
The report just came out. The reason you ask what judicial penalty was applied or not is because you were basically unaware of the facts since the press you read didn't report it.
We know what happened to Manafort and Gates and Roger Stone, don’t we? And what is happening now with Steve Bannon, correct? Judicial processes.
What charges have been brought concerning Hunter Biden?
Do you even understand the difference?
I do understand the difference. One group of individuals has had a sea of ink spilled talking about what they may or may not have done.
Hunter Biden and the latest report has been blackballed. In the NY Times fact check of the Prez debate they said...there have been allegations of Hunter wrong doing BUT Biden and his lawyers have denied it. Stating the issue has been resolved.
If you can find any analysis of the 3.5 million dollar transfer from a Russian to Biden's son in the NY Times, the BBC, CBS, etc. please point me to the links. Trick question...you can't since they have decided to not only to not report on the report, but say any mention of it has been refuted. Refuted by whom? Who has done the work?
Do you even understand the difference? Or has your head decided on the wrongdoing, as distinguished from the American judicial system or the voters.
That’s an interesting world view.
I do understand the difference. Apparently you don't. I keep talking about what the press you follow chooses not to report on. You can't defend that...so you change the subject to the judicial process which has nothing to do with what we originally talked about. Which is the press actively ignores certain stories and facts.
Another question. Was the Clinton Foundation shut down for wrongdoing? Is it active?
Well that is an interesting question. It is very interesting how donations went up when HC had positions of power. And it is very interesting that when she lost the election for the presidency donations dried up. Apparently Durham is investigating. What will happen with that is anyone's guess.
But again...what does the Clinton Foundation have to do with the NY Times, BBC, AP, etc not reporting certain stories and fact patterns? Why are they not reporting on the documents released by the gov that reflect on the Russian hoax?
When you keep talking about other issues tells me you don't have an answer. OR the answer is uncomfortable. It should be uncomfortable because you are not getting the full story. In other words a form of propaganda due to incomplete info. For reference I tell people that exclusively get their news from Fox and similar organizations that they too need to read/watch the other side to get a complete picture.
If you read/watch only one side, then you are ignorant about many facts since all these various new organizations are biased one way or the other.
Unfortunately our main stream press is anything but non partisan. They have an agenda and push it. When facts come up that go against that agenda, they dismiss it, or don't report on it.
And the fd up part is people like you think you are getting the news str8 down the line. Getting all the info. You are not.