2020...

We made a complete mess of Central and South America, and now pay the price in many ways. But saying because we have that history we should sit back and watch it happen to us is ludicrous. Only an anti-American trumpist would attempt to use that as an excuse for a lack of action.


You are reciting UNION gibberish......

Try to compose a worthwhile paragraph on your own once in a while...

 
Really? Moral distinctions. So you're saying it's okay if we do it but "Bad Vladimir" if they do it, right? That actually makes sense, jock sniffer. You liberals do love your hypocrisy, don't you? Steven Hall... CNN analyst. Loch K. Johnson... advisor to Democrats Carter and Senator Church. So, dimwit, if you're going to do some homework... do ALL your homework.



I'm sorry you got so emotional when citing Hall and Johnson's impressive cv's, that you failed to read what they said about the moral distinction.

Dumbshit.

Here it is again. They are making the moral distinctions. Learn how to read if you want to debate someone smart.

"But in recent decades, both Mr. Hall and Mr. Johnson argued, Russian and American interferences in elections have not been morally equivalent. American interventions have generally been aimed at helping non-authoritarian candidates challenge dictators or otherwise promoting democracy. Russia has more often intervened to disrupt democracy or promote authoritarian rule, they said."
 
President Trump is busy fighting off our nation's 2 biggest enemies... the libtard media and the libtard politicians. But to answer your "Nothiing" summary, yet another link to prove your dumbass wrong.


He signed laws passed by veto-proof votes in Congress that gives him the power to impose sanctions. Who has he sanctioned?

An interesting note -- the article includes

U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that entities backed by the Kremlin sought to boost Republican Trump’s chances of winning the White House in the 2016 election against his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton. But Trump in July publicly accepted Russian President Vladimir Putin’s denials at a joint press conference after they met for a summit in Helsinki.
 
I'm sorry you got so emotional when citing Hall and Johnson's impressive cv's, that you failed to read what they said about the moral distinction.

Dumbshit.

Here it is again. They are making the moral distinctions. Learn how to read if you want to debate someone smart.

"But in recent decades, both Mr. Hall and Mr. Johnson argued, Russian and American interferences in elections have not been morally equivalent. American interventions have generally been aimed at helping non-authoritarian candidates challenge dictators or otherwise promoting democracy. Russia has more often intervened to disrupt democracy or promote authoritarian rule, they said."

I know what they said because I read it. I'm sorry you shit the bed because you didn't research their backgrounds to know they're both hardcore libtards.
 
He signed laws passed by veto-proof votes in Congress that gives him the power to impose sanctions. Who has he sanctioned?

An interesting note -- the article includes

U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that entities backed by the Kremlin sought to boost Republican Trump’s chances of winning the White House in the 2016 election against his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton. But Trump in July publicly accepted Russian President Vladimir Putin’s denials at a joint press conference after they met for a summit in Helsinki.

You'd have to ask him who he's sanctioned. Maybe other countries have backed off because he's not a bowing pussy like Obama.
 
Wow. Another career libtard taking hypocrisy to a higher level. Anybody still confused as to why Trump continues to win?

I wonder why CNN hasn't reported in Dianne's comments... NOT!

Feinstein in 2018

Feinstein in 2020
 
Back
Top