Bruddah IZ
DA
So youʻre not a CFP.I know my limitations, I don't pretend to be expert in all things.
So youʻre not a CFP.I know my limitations, I don't pretend to be expert in all things.
So youʻre not a CFP.
Are there others like you out there?I am
Are there others like you out there?
Language!WTF dude!! Retail financial planners don't know about risk allocation?!!! Good grief!! How do you call yourself a planner?!!
Please name a single industry that does not rely on fossil fuels.
Why?
Sure they are.
It won't always be that way,you just want to delay the inevitable and fight change, mostly because Exxon and Co. said so. (i.e. paid big bucks to have that propaganda filtered into your media consumption and now they have you and you'll never turn back . . . and they knew that all along).You can't name one can you? Neither can I.
It won't always be that way,you just want to delay the inevitable and fight change, mostly because Exxon and Co. said so. (i.e. paid big bucks to have that propaganda filtered into your media consumption and now they have you and you'll never turn back . . . and they knew that all along).
Nothing lasts forever . . . now as for the Trump nominees and appointments, most are actually opposed to the mission of the post Trump has put them up for.It doesn't have to be all or nothing. We will continue to use fossil fuels for the foreseeable future, but filling your Cabinet and advisory staff with outright AGW deniers is just foolish. If it's possible AGW is real, hope for the best, plan for the worst.
It won't always be that way,you just want to delay the inevitable and fight change, mostly because Exxon and Co. said so. (i.e. paid big bucks to have that propaganda filtered into your media consumption and now they have you and you'll never turn back . . . and they knew that all along).
Humor needs to be based in some relative reality to be funny. The stretch in logic to deem the above humorous is the only thing that is laughable.
You can't name one can you? And you don't know what you mean by "It won't always be that way". I don't like delaying "it". (whatever that means) That's for you protectionist types that like subsidizing failing companies.It won't always be that way,you just want to delay the inevitable and fight change, mostly because Exxon and Co. said so. (i.e. paid big bucks to have that propaganda filtered into your media consumption and now they have you and you'll never turn back . . . and they knew that all along).
Has it occurred to you that planning for the worse includes the use of fossil fuels? Cheap, plentiful, portable.It doesn't have to be all or nothing. We will continue to use fossil fuels for the foreseeable future, but filling your Cabinet and advisory staff with outright AGW deniers is just foolish. If it's possible AGW is real, hope for the best, plan for the worst.
You mean after they found them not profitable?Exxon and other big-energy climate-change denier corporations are now playing nice with clean energy.
http://www.climatechangenews.com/2016/05/23/exxon-shell-total-and-statoil-make-clean-energy-plays/
Some remember with caution the days when auto, tire, and oil companies bought up many of the public streetcar and commuter train companies all over the country and liquidated them.
You mean because the Navy is switching to Vertical take off jets and electro magnetic catapults? Otherwise, carriers have to put 25 knots over the deck to launch aircraft safely and that's no joke.Humor needs to be based in some relative reality to be funny. The stretch in logic to deem the above humorous is the only thing that is laughable.
You mean because the Navy is switching to Vertical take off jets and electro magnetic catapults? Otherwise, carriers have to put 25 knots over the deck to launch aircraft safely and that's no joke.
You mean after they found them not profitable?