2020...

Sheriff Joe said:
Credible?
You have been questioning my credibility for years, dummy.
Click to expand...
It’s not my decision that you disseminated on the public broadband a specific and credible threat to assassinate a United States Senator.

That’s a question for the federal jury at your attempted murder trial to decide.

Rather, it’s my opinion you disseminated on the public broadband a specific and credible threat to assassinate a United States Senator in violation of 18 U.S.C. 879 (a)(3).
 
Nonononono said:
It’s not my decision that you disseminated on the public broadband a specific and credible threat to assassinate a United States Senator.

That’s a question for the federal jury at your attempted murder trial to decide.

Rather, it’s my opinion you disseminated on the public broadband a specific and credible threat to assassinate a United States Senator in violation of 18 U.S.C. 879 (a)(3).
Click to expand...

Credible?
You have been questioning my credibility for years, dummy.
 
nononono said:
No one made that comment ya Tool .....
Stop with the kindergarten comments.

By the way ...you spilled ink on your avatar.
Click to expand...
So far the evidence collected: the post itself; a half dozen explanatory excuses; and the totality of his animus toward women, persons of color, and perceived political adversaries.

Together with his having met the element of mens rea, and his depraved heart, a plea deal of life with the possibility of parole is his best option at this point.
 
Nonononono said:
So far the evidence collected: the post itself;
a half dozen explanatory excuses; and the
totality of his animus toward women, persons
of color, and perceived political adversaries.

Together with his having met the element of
mens rea, and his depraved heart, a plea deal
of life with the possibility of parole is his best
option at this point.
Click to expand...

Wow.....what a worthless word salad.

You can buy another balloon...I do believe
you've " exhausted " all of the stale air in
the " Evidence " one.........

images
 
The immediate problem as I see it is the risk he takes with each new racist, sexist, xenophobic post, anywhere in the forum. Each one compounds his legal jeopardy.

As to the tens of thousands of preexisting racist, threatening posts, sure he could have them deleted, but that places the admin in legal jeopardy too for aiding and abetting.

On the upside, as a felon for committing a federal crime, he can appeal to Trump for a pardon.
 
Nonononono said:
So far the evidence collected: the post itself; a half dozen explanatory excuses; and the totality of his animus toward women, persons of color, and perceived political adversaries.

Together with his having met the element of mens rea, and his depraved heart, a plea deal of life with the possibility of parole is his best option at this point.
Click to expand...
Which one of the protected are you, dummy?
 
Nonononono said:
The immediate problem as I see it is the risk he takes with each new racist, sexist, xenophobic post, anywhere in the forum. Each one compounds his legal jeopardy.

As to the tens of thousands of preexisting racist, threatening posts, sure he could have them deleted, but that places the admin in legal jeopardy too for aiding and abetting.

On the upside, as a felon for committing a federal crime, he can appeal to Trump for a pardon.
Click to expand...
Are you really espola?
 
Report: Kamala Harris Campaign Brought in Crowd to ‘Boost’ Cheering During Her DNC Speech
Kamala-Harris-DNC-speech-640x480.jpg

Ben Margot/AP Photo
HANNAH BLEAU24 Aug 20192,764
1:56
Sen. Kamala Harris’s (D-CA) campaign brought in dozens of cheering supporters to enthusiastically react to her Democratic National Committee (DNC) speech in San Francisco Friday, according to The Atlantic’sEdward-Isaac Dovere.

Harris delivered a speech at the DNC meeting Friday and reportedly had dozens of supporters — purportedly supplied by her campaign — who cheered during her speech and promptly left after it was finished.
 
Nonononono said:
The immediate problem as I see it is the risk he takes with each new racist, sexist, xenophobic post, anywhere in the forum. Each one compounds his legal jeopardy.

As to the tens of thousands of preexisting racist, threatening posts, sure he could have them deleted, but that places the admin in legal jeopardy too for aiding and abetting.

On the upside, as a felon for committing a federal crime, he can appeal to Trump for a pardon.
Click to expand...
This post exemplifies the danger of leftist speech policing.
I should not need to explain further.
 
messy said:
Recession is recession, growth is growth. Always different causal factors. W (Republican) burned through a deficit by overspending and led us into recession. O (Democrat) led us out of recession into modest growth, in a very short time. Trump accelerated the modest growth for 1.5 years, increased the deficit dramatically and now growth has slowed dramatically. We will see about recession. Voters don't like recessions.
None of this stuff takes a rocket scientist to understand. No need to overcomplicate it.
Click to expand...
Agree. A crutch is a crutch. Obama used them for 6 years to nearly double the national debt. That set up the next admin for the cyclical bust that the U.S. has Repeated every 7-10 years. From Clinton’s bail out of American banks in the Tequila Crisis, clear back to the depression when the Fed inflated the money supply in the early twenties to artificially inflate the stock market. And if rece$$ion is rece$$ion and growth i$ growth, why would the causal factors be different? Lol!!
 
I have been traveling the last few days and just spent a few minutes catching up over my morning coffee before heading back south. I offer this submission, which I believe is germane to this thread --

We dont need more laws.
If someone goes online and says he is gonna shoot people, we should believe him and send in the white coats.
We already have laws against making terrorist threats.
Its not rocket science.

-- the Oceanside plumber, a few days ago.​
 
espola said:
I have been traveling the last few days and just spent a few minutes catching up over my morning coffee before heading back south. I offer this submission, which I believe is germane to this thread --

We dont need more laws.
If someone goes online and says he is gonna shoot people, we should believe him and send in the white coats.
We already have laws against making terrorist threats.
Its not rocket science.

-- the Oceanside plumber, a few days ago.​
Click to expand...
Dont worry.
I know you were kidding about the guillotines.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
Agree. A crutch is a crutch. Obama used them for 6 years to nearly double the national debt. That set up the next admin for the cyclical bust that the U.S. has Repeated every 7-10 years. From Clinton’s bail out of American banks in the Tequila Crisis, clear back to the depression when the Fed inflated the money supply in the early twenties to artificially inflate the stock market. And if rece$$ion is rece$$ion and growth i$ growth, why would the causal factors be different? Lol!!
Click to expand...
In your arrogance, decidedly unwarranted, you know the reasons.
All I know is, if the recession occurs while you’re president, you lose the next election. Capiche?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top