Poor Iz doesn’t even understand capitalism, let alone American corporate capitalism. He has no idea about how finance and economics work with people and institutions who have money. He just reads airport books and watches YouTube.
2020...
- Thread starter tenacious
- Start date
Sheriff Joe
DA
DAILYWIRE.COM
Beto: Migrants 'Have No Choice But To Come Here' Due To U.S. 'Excesses' Causing Climate Change
Sean Rayford/Getty Images
By RYAN SAAVEDRA
@REALSAAVEDRA
June 28, 2019
44.3k views
Democrat presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke claimed this week that migrants have "no choice" but to come to the United States because of climate change caused by American "excesses."
O'Rourke, who is struggling to stay relevant in the 2020 Democratic primary, made the remarks on Wednesday while visiting the Homestead Temporary Shelter for Unaccompanied Children in Florida.
"And we've got to remember that they are fleeing the deadliest countries on the face of the planet today compounded by drought that was caused not by God, not by mother nature, but by us, man-made climate change, our emissions, our excesses, our inaction in the face of the facts and the science," O'Rourke said. "When it is that deadly and when you're unable to grow your own food to feed yourself, you have no choice but to come here."
WATCH:
Ryan Saavedra
Beto: Migrants 'Have No Choice But To Come Here' Due To U.S. 'Excesses' Causing Climate Change
Sean Rayford/Getty Images
By RYAN SAAVEDRA
@REALSAAVEDRA
June 28, 2019
44.3k views
Democrat presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke claimed this week that migrants have "no choice" but to come to the United States because of climate change caused by American "excesses."
O'Rourke, who is struggling to stay relevant in the 2020 Democratic primary, made the remarks on Wednesday while visiting the Homestead Temporary Shelter for Unaccompanied Children in Florida.
"And we've got to remember that they are fleeing the deadliest countries on the face of the planet today compounded by drought that was caused not by God, not by mother nature, but by us, man-made climate change, our emissions, our excesses, our inaction in the face of the facts and the science," O'Rourke said. "When it is that deadly and when you're unable to grow your own food to feed yourself, you have no choice but to come here."
WATCH:
Ryan Saavedra
Sheriff Joe
DA
MSNBC’s Wallace: ‘Beautiful,’ ‘Brilliant,’ ‘Bad-Ass’ Kamala Harris Is the Antithesis of Trump
PAM KEY28 Jun 20192,247
1:40
Friday on MSNBC’s “Deadline: White House,” host Nicolle Wallace said Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) is “beautiful,” “brilliant,” and a “bad-ass,” who she said would not even know who a man like President Donald Trump is.
While reporting on the Trump teams reaction, the Democratic debates, Washington Post reporter Ashley Parker said, “The people who really popped for them was Warren and Kamala. So Warren they think she has an appeal that is very different way from Trump. She is authentic. She can give a good speech on the stump. She knows what she thinks. And that economic populism is one they think can hurt him. Kamala Harris, they think she is aggressive. She is a very good prosecutor, but sort of a black woman and daughter of I believe Indian and Jamaican immigrant. She is the physical antithesis. She has the life story antithesis of President Trump and offers a pretty strong contrast there.”
PAM KEY28 Jun 20192,247
1:40
Friday on MSNBC’s “Deadline: White House,” host Nicolle Wallace said Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) is “beautiful,” “brilliant,” and a “bad-ass,” who she said would not even know who a man like President Donald Trump is.
While reporting on the Trump teams reaction, the Democratic debates, Washington Post reporter Ashley Parker said, “The people who really popped for them was Warren and Kamala. So Warren they think she has an appeal that is very different way from Trump. She is authentic. She can give a good speech on the stump. She knows what she thinks. And that economic populism is one they think can hurt him. Kamala Harris, they think she is aggressive. She is a very good prosecutor, but sort of a black woman and daughter of I believe Indian and Jamaican immigrant. She is the physical antithesis. She has the life story antithesis of President Trump and offers a pretty strong contrast there.”
Sheriff Joe
DA
3'
JUNE 29, 2019
Ideoloons
By Deana Chadwell
One look at the lineup of Democrat presidential candidates and I have to wonder what we’re coming to -- is this the best the party can come up with? Really? If the Democrats make up roughly half the population, then why are these people the cream that’s risen to the top? If they’re the top, what on God’s green earth is at the bottom?
Sheriff Joe
DA
JUNE 29, 2019
The debates: Democrat contempt for America and Americans laid bare
By Patricia McCarthy
If there were ever two evenings that exposed the economic idiocy of the Democratic Party, it was both debate nights. Every single candidate promises a wish list of free things for all, including a $1,000-a-month income (Yang) courtesy of the government. College will be free; health care will be free, even for illegal aliens; abortion will be free on demand; student debt will be erased; etc. Not one of them explains where all this money will come from; perhaps they think they can just print it. They always claim that it will come from the undeserving rich, but it never does. There are not near enough rich people to plunder for that much money. It would be extracted from middle-class taxpayers, as Bernie Sanders admitted, because that is where the most money is. Like all socialists, they mean to take from people who work and provide for those who do not work or produce. Every one of them is as economically illiterate as Ocasio-Cortez, but they are all old enough to know better. It was a pathetic display of ignorance and shameless pandering. They still think the American people are easily manipulated with their bluster. But then the moderators are themselves well known leftists who have worked hard every day of their lives since 2015 to defeat Trump and promote impeachment. For what should he be impeached? Because they are mad that he won.
And if there was ever an evening that made American citizens double down on protecting their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, it was hearing all of them talk about abrogating that right. They all clearly believe that law-abiding citizens should not own guns. It is perennially lost on them that criminals will always have guns and without them, good people have no means to defend themselves. Given the historical fact that every tyranny on the planet began by confiscating guns — Hitler, Mao, Chávez — we should all be very afraid if any one of these people is elected. Each one of them would, they make clear, immediately embark on the path every tyrant of the past took on his way to genocide and socialist devastation, like what is now happening in Venezuela. Starving one's people is a form of genocide, is it not?
There were very few challenging questions. Elizabeth Warren was not asked about her fake American Indian ancestry. They were not asked about their support of infanticide. Not one of them was asked about his anti-Israel sentiment. All of them but Delaney want to take away our private health insurance but not give up their own. Biden was not asked about his son's multi-million-dollar "businesses" in Ukraine and China. Buttigeig was only gently asked about his race problem in South Bend, and he demurred. He fired his city's first black police chief. His "thing" is attacking Christians who he assumes are homophobic; he never offers any evidence. Being gay may help him with one identity community, but he has a race problem with another. He is no more popular in South Bend than the Che-loving de Blasio is in New York. Neither of them is remotely prepared to be president.
The debates: Democrat contempt for America and Americans laid bare
By Patricia McCarthy
If there were ever two evenings that exposed the economic idiocy of the Democratic Party, it was both debate nights. Every single candidate promises a wish list of free things for all, including a $1,000-a-month income (Yang) courtesy of the government. College will be free; health care will be free, even for illegal aliens; abortion will be free on demand; student debt will be erased; etc. Not one of them explains where all this money will come from; perhaps they think they can just print it. They always claim that it will come from the undeserving rich, but it never does. There are not near enough rich people to plunder for that much money. It would be extracted from middle-class taxpayers, as Bernie Sanders admitted, because that is where the most money is. Like all socialists, they mean to take from people who work and provide for those who do not work or produce. Every one of them is as economically illiterate as Ocasio-Cortez, but they are all old enough to know better. It was a pathetic display of ignorance and shameless pandering. They still think the American people are easily manipulated with their bluster. But then the moderators are themselves well known leftists who have worked hard every day of their lives since 2015 to defeat Trump and promote impeachment. For what should he be impeached? Because they are mad that he won.
And if there was ever an evening that made American citizens double down on protecting their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, it was hearing all of them talk about abrogating that right. They all clearly believe that law-abiding citizens should not own guns. It is perennially lost on them that criminals will always have guns and without them, good people have no means to defend themselves. Given the historical fact that every tyranny on the planet began by confiscating guns — Hitler, Mao, Chávez — we should all be very afraid if any one of these people is elected. Each one of them would, they make clear, immediately embark on the path every tyrant of the past took on his way to genocide and socialist devastation, like what is now happening in Venezuela. Starving one's people is a form of genocide, is it not?
There were very few challenging questions. Elizabeth Warren was not asked about her fake American Indian ancestry. They were not asked about their support of infanticide. Not one of them was asked about his anti-Israel sentiment. All of them but Delaney want to take away our private health insurance but not give up their own. Biden was not asked about his son's multi-million-dollar "businesses" in Ukraine and China. Buttigeig was only gently asked about his race problem in South Bend, and he demurred. He fired his city's first black police chief. His "thing" is attacking Christians who he assumes are homophobic; he never offers any evidence. Being gay may help him with one identity community, but he has a race problem with another. He is no more popular in South Bend than the Che-loving de Blasio is in New York. Neither of them is remotely prepared to be president.
Sheriff Joe
DA
JUNE 29, 2019
Kamala Harris: victim in chief
By Jonathan F. Keiler
Kamala Harris is not so much the anti-Trump, as she is bizzaro Trump. The consensus winner of Thursday’s debate, she did so by playing to her strengths, that is her sex and racial identity.
Like Trump, Harris is a bully. Trump is the old-fashioned type bully from the schoolyard, a big kid who commands attention and has playful but derogatory nicknames for all his lessers. Harris represents the modern bully. A kid who commands attention by playing the victim, and who hurls forceful accusations of abusive behavior against other kids, adults or anyone that gets in the way.
She played that role to a tee on Thursday, with Democratic front-runner Joe Biden as her primary target. In a clearly planned and deliberate attack on the former vice-president, Harris essentially accused Biden of hurting her feelings, by negotiating forty years ago with a couple of segregationist fellow senators. Then to make clear that it wasn’t just her feelings as a fifty-something woman (and U.S. senator herself) that were hurt, she claimed that the forced busing that Biden opposed, would have kept her from being sent to a better school as a child, by implication, hurting little Kamala too.
Kamala Harris: victim in chief
By Jonathan F. Keiler
Kamala Harris is not so much the anti-Trump, as she is bizzaro Trump. The consensus winner of Thursday’s debate, she did so by playing to her strengths, that is her sex and racial identity.
Like Trump, Harris is a bully. Trump is the old-fashioned type bully from the schoolyard, a big kid who commands attention and has playful but derogatory nicknames for all his lessers. Harris represents the modern bully. A kid who commands attention by playing the victim, and who hurls forceful accusations of abusive behavior against other kids, adults or anyone that gets in the way.
She played that role to a tee on Thursday, with Democratic front-runner Joe Biden as her primary target. In a clearly planned and deliberate attack on the former vice-president, Harris essentially accused Biden of hurting her feelings, by negotiating forty years ago with a couple of segregationist fellow senators. Then to make clear that it wasn’t just her feelings as a fifty-something woman (and U.S. senator herself) that were hurt, she claimed that the forced busing that Biden opposed, would have kept her from being sent to a better school as a child, by implication, hurting little Kamala too.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Latest version of the queer Pete.
JUNE 28, 2019
Buttigieg's knee-jerk compulsion to scold Christians pops up again at second debate
By Monica Showalter
If you ask me to pick a winner at the Democratic debate on night two in Miami, I would have said Pete Buttigieg. He came off as reasonable, clear-thinking, pithy, and pleasant. He respected time limits. I didn't agree with him on anything, but he gave a sense of coming from rational grounding. Maybe his leftie ideas could be tempered with real-world realities. Maybe he could be persuaded...
But then, then, then, then...he couldn't stop himself. The transcript:
We have to talk about one other thing, the Republican Party likes to cloak itself in the language of religion. Now, our party doesn't talk about that as much, largely for a very good reason, which was we are committed to the separation of church and state. We stand for people of any religion and no religion. But we should call out hypocrisy, for a party that associates itself with Christianity."
Buttigieg whipped out for about the umpteenth time his unsolicited opinion about just how un-Christian all those inadequate, wicked, dare-I-say sinful Christians out there really are, hooking his argument up to the border surge issue. Gotcha. Bad Christians. Not like good-Christian me, that paragon of all virtue-signals.
It was about as attractive as a fart in church.
Here's the video of him coming out with his Inner Scold at no one's request:
What's interesting is that most of the rabid left, whose Democratic Party he identifies with, prefer to launch attacks on Christianity itself. They hate Christianity, not to mention the idea of God. It's obvious in their court cases challenging this cross or that manger scene in public space, prayer in public schools, crosses at military cemeteries, etc. Democrats themselves have booed God at one of their recent party conventions. President Obama rarely ever went to church services, and his references to faith in speeches always threw in the non-faith of atheists into his mix, since it was so important to his base. Pete himself hasn't complained a bit.
Buttigieg, though, approaches the matter differently — by going after Christians themselves, not Christianity. Me good, you bad, so vote me into absolute power, you miserably inadequate sinners.
He does this a lot, it's what makes him tick, and apparently no one has tried to stop him. J.E. Dyer at Liberty Unyielding has a good list of his past incidents playing the religious scold, doing the exact same thing earlier:
JUNE 28, 2019
Buttigieg's knee-jerk compulsion to scold Christians pops up again at second debate
By Monica Showalter
If you ask me to pick a winner at the Democratic debate on night two in Miami, I would have said Pete Buttigieg. He came off as reasonable, clear-thinking, pithy, and pleasant. He respected time limits. I didn't agree with him on anything, but he gave a sense of coming from rational grounding. Maybe his leftie ideas could be tempered with real-world realities. Maybe he could be persuaded...
But then, then, then, then...he couldn't stop himself. The transcript:
We have to talk about one other thing, the Republican Party likes to cloak itself in the language of religion. Now, our party doesn't talk about that as much, largely for a very good reason, which was we are committed to the separation of church and state. We stand for people of any religion and no religion. But we should call out hypocrisy, for a party that associates itself with Christianity."
Buttigieg whipped out for about the umpteenth time his unsolicited opinion about just how un-Christian all those inadequate, wicked, dare-I-say sinful Christians out there really are, hooking his argument up to the border surge issue. Gotcha. Bad Christians. Not like good-Christian me, that paragon of all virtue-signals.
It was about as attractive as a fart in church.
Here's the video of him coming out with his Inner Scold at no one's request:
What's interesting is that most of the rabid left, whose Democratic Party he identifies with, prefer to launch attacks on Christianity itself. They hate Christianity, not to mention the idea of God. It's obvious in their court cases challenging this cross or that manger scene in public space, prayer in public schools, crosses at military cemeteries, etc. Democrats themselves have booed God at one of their recent party conventions. President Obama rarely ever went to church services, and his references to faith in speeches always threw in the non-faith of atheists into his mix, since it was so important to his base. Pete himself hasn't complained a bit.
Buttigieg, though, approaches the matter differently — by going after Christians themselves, not Christianity. Me good, you bad, so vote me into absolute power, you miserably inadequate sinners.
He does this a lot, it's what makes him tick, and apparently no one has tried to stop him. J.E. Dyer at Liberty Unyielding has a good list of his past incidents playing the religious scold, doing the exact same thing earlier:
Between Trump’s embrace of Putin meddling, Carter’s public acknowledgement of Trump’s illegitimate victory and the early detection of all the bots going after Kamala with a race-based attack, I think this time the Dems will be ready for the cheating.
Just have to have proper policing of the web and the polls to continue our democracy.
Just have to have proper policing of the web and the polls to continue our democracy.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Maybe they should align with China . . . like having a super pack.
Sheriff Joe
DA
What race are you speaking of?
Sheriff Joe
DA
Bruddah IZ
DA
Agree.....tenaciouspola. Means you read not before you commented. Theyʻre fighting interventionism though they donʻt know how it is implemented.
Do you yourself a favor and read. Your comments will reflect your comprehension or lack of.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Police the web to continue democracy. You people like arguing with yourselves . Please continue.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Beto: Migrants 'Have No Choice But To Come Here' Due To U.S. 'Excesses' Causing Climate Change
https://www.dailywire.com/news/4899...ook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro
Democrat presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke claimed this week that migrants have "no choice" but to come to the United States because of climate change caused by American "excesses."
O'Rourke, who is struggling to stay relevant in the 2020 Democratic primary, made the remarks on Wednesday while visiting the Homestead Temporary Shelter for Unaccompanied Children in Florida.
"And we've got to remember that they are fleeing the deadliest countries on the face of the planet today compounded by drought that was caused not by God, not by mother nature, but by us, man-made climate change, our emissions, our excesses, our inaction in the face of the facts and the science," O'Rourke said. "When it is that deadly and when you're unable to grow your own food to feed yourself, you have no choice but to come here."
https://www.dailywire.com/news/4899...ook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro
Democrat presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke claimed this week that migrants have "no choice" but to come to the United States because of climate change caused by American "excesses."
O'Rourke, who is struggling to stay relevant in the 2020 Democratic primary, made the remarks on Wednesday while visiting the Homestead Temporary Shelter for Unaccompanied Children in Florida.
"And we've got to remember that they are fleeing the deadliest countries on the face of the planet today compounded by drought that was caused not by God, not by mother nature, but by us, man-made climate change, our emissions, our excesses, our inaction in the face of the facts and the science," O'Rourke said. "When it is that deadly and when you're unable to grow your own food to feed yourself, you have no choice but to come here."
Bruddah IZ
DA
Trump does not exist in a vacuum. Many supporters turned off by some of his antics are still far more appalled by an emerging radical neo-socialist Democratic agenda. If the alternative to Trump is a disturbing tolerance among some Democrats for anti-Semitism, the Green New Deal, reparations, a permissive approach to abortion even very late in pregnancy, a wealth tax, a 70-90% top income tax rate, the abolition of ICE, open borders, and Medicare for all, Trump's record between 2017-20 will seem moderate and preferable. Progressives do not fully appreciate how the hysterics and media coverage of the Kavanaugh hearings, the Covington teenagers and the Jussie Smollett psychodrama turned off half the country. Such incidents and their reportage confirmed suspicions of cultural bias, media distortions, and an absence of fair play and reciprocity.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/19/opin...F2URI9vBZ4tbUNF0IZ16LaO0TTeU6gS52bVrhxlemsIdU
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/19/opin...F2URI9vBZ4tbUNF0IZ16LaO0TTeU6gS52bVrhxlemsIdU
Bruddah IZ
DA
Freakin' hillarylarious!!
Who believes this crap?
Nonononono
PREMIER
I can only imagine the outrage this fine off topic nutter crowd would reach should there ever be a moment when Trump and his buddies might engage in nefarious drag queen propensities.
3'
JUNE 29, 2019
Ideoloons
By Deana Chadwell
One look at the lineup of Democrat presidential candidates and I have to wonder what we’re coming to -- is this the best the party can come up with? Really? If the Democrats make up roughly half the population, then why are these people the cream that’s risen to the top? If they’re the top, what on God’s green earth is at the bottom?But what about religious beliefs? Even religion should be subjected to the verification requirement -- why would we want to believe something false? Any god worth his salt would leave a trail of evidence. As a Christian I have no trouble lining up the historical/archeological substantiation for the claims made by the doctrines of my faith. It isn’t blind. Even the Resurrection stands the test of logical reality (See the writings of J. Warner Wallace or Lee Strobel). Christians have no need to harden into belligerent, dangerous ideologues. We don’t have to kill those who disagree with us. We don’t need to rape their daughters or knife them in the streets. Ironically, the existence of those who do these things merely verifies the Christian doctrine of original sin and the teachings about idolatry.
Nonononono
PREMIER
Never mind. Here you go nutters. Let the apologies flow.