Climate and Weather

President Donald Trump is scaling back sweeping Obama-era curbs on greenhouse gas emissions from power plants burning coal, his biggest step yet to fulfill his campaign promise to stop a “war” on the fossil fuel.Yet the Environmental Protection Agency’s rewrite of the Clean Power Plan, unveiled Wednesday in Washington, will do little to halt a nationwide shift away from coal and toward cheaper electricity generated by the wind, the sun and natural gas.

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/trumps-biggest-move-end-war-215826597.html
“It won’t necessarily be the saving grace for coal,” but “this regulation gives coal a fighting chance,” said Nick Loris, an economist with the Heritage Foundation. The EPA is following the rule of law and removing “government-imposed barriers that will lead to increased innovation, competition and efficiency that will ultimately drive down pollution.”

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/trumps-biggest-move-end-war-215826597.html

Huspola like his father doesnʻt read through what he links.
 
“It won’t necessarily be the saving grace for coal,” but “this regulation gives coal a fighting chance,” said Nick Loris, an economist with the Heritage Foundation. The EPA is following the rule of law and removing “government-imposed barriers that will lead to increased innovation, competition and efficiency that will ultimately drive down pollution.”

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/trumps-biggest-move-end-war-215826597.html

Huspola like his father doesnʻt read through what he links.

The Heritage Foundation is well-known for their expertise in pollution.
 
“It won’t necessarily be the saving grace for coal,” but “this regulation gives coal a fighting chance,” said Nick Loris, an economist with the Heritage Foundation. The EPA is following the rule of law and removing “government-imposed barriers that will lead to increased innovation, competition and efficiency that will ultimately drive down pollution.”

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/trumps-biggest-move-end-war-215826597.html

Huspola like his father doesnʻt read through what he links.

Looks like clean coal failed despite all the incentives. But the idiots like to look backwards.
 
Under slavery, slaves are either sold as a whole, as "capital," or are rented out to other
masters. In short, slave labor has a unit, or rental, price as well as a capital value.— Rothbard
 
Human flourishing happened despite the global use of slavery.
From the point of view of capitalization, there is no fundamental distinction between land and produced means of production. In fact, Fetter might have pointed out that under slavery, where laborers are owned, they, too, become capitalized, and the present price of slaves becomes the capitalized value of expected future earnings (or "rents") of slaves, discounted by the social rate of time preference. But the fact that slaves, too, can be capitalized does not justify obliterating for other purposes any and all distinctions between slaves and capital goods.
 
Human flourishing happened despite the global use of coal. But the idiots like arguing against their own existence.
And slaves built the pyramids and gave us a textile industry, genius.
You did recognize that you were an "idiot" to whom I was referring, though, so there's that.
 
From the point of view of capitalization, there is no fundamental distinction between land and produced means of production. In fact, Fetter might have pointed out that under slavery, where laborers are owned, they, too, become capitalized, and the present price of slaves becomes the capitalized value of expected future earnings (or "rents") of slaves, discounted by the social rate of time preference. But the fact that slaves, too, can be capitalized does not justify obliterating for other purposes any and all distinctions between slaves and capital goods.

"produced means of production?" Care to translate, Mr. Economics?
You remain so dumb about all financial and economic matters.
Back when I didn't make any money, so I made what you probably make, like when I was in my 20s, I used to read up on economic texts too! But I understood them much better than you.
 
"produced means of production?" Care to translate, Mr. Economics?
You remain so dumb about all financial and economic matters.
Back when I didn't make any money, so I made what you probably make, like when I was in my 20s, I used to read up on economic texts too! But I understood them much better than you.
diz cuts and pastes without citation hoping his little pals will ohh and ahh.
 
diz cuts and pastes without citation hoping his little pals will ohh and ahh.

When's the last time you posted independent thought that stimulates
either side of a humans cerebral hemispheres.....You parrot others thought
patterns and idea prints to the extent of clear cut plagiarism...

The information BI posts does NOT need to be documented as if it was a
High School " English " essay. Quoting collegiate level rhetoric will only
jam up a multitude of your synaptic regions and I would not want to be
party to the further demise of what's left of your " Grey " matter....

So give it a break " Rodent "....just repeat this simple phrase
three times daily :

" I am fully aware I support an Evil Criminal Political Party "
 
"produced means of production?" Care to translate, Mr. Economics?
You remain so dumb about all financial and economic matters.
Back when I didn't make any money, so I made what you probably make, like when I was in my 20s, I used to read up on economic texts too! But I understood them much better than you.
Was the translation already given not comprehendible? Lol!
 
Back
Top