zags77
SILVER ELITE
http://www.boysecnl.com/2019/03/boy...essive-list-of-new-memer-clubs-for-2019-2020/
Interesting for So Cal, FC Goldenstate and LA Breakers,
Interesting for So Cal, FC Goldenstate and LA Breakers,
So I wonder if FC Golden State is leaving DA.... Hmmmmmmmm
Yeah Crossfire Premier (WA) also, the girls dropped out of DA so I guess there all in now.
age groups (U14, U15, U16, U17, and U18/19) and collegiate exposure through multiple Boys ECNL National Events. Looks like they split u16/17 so that maybe attractive to some.
There showcases are well run and attended but it's the manadtory travel that can be killer expensive for some: Florida & Oklahoma,etc showcases plus trips to AZ, NV for league games and it can really add up to some serious $$$ especially if some family members attend also.
So this means that both Golden State and Premier will have both DA and ECNL. Spreading the talent thin on the East Side...
Its important to keep this in perspective.So this means that both Golden State and Premier will have both DA and ECNL. Spreading the talent thin on the East Side...
Sure, but Premier can barely field a competitive DA team. Their ECNL teams are trying to pull kids from flight 1 / gold, but aren't having much success.There's absolutely no chance that talent will be spread thin for clubs with both DA and ECNL. Priority is DA (USSF) and not ECNL (USClub Soccer). ECNL is a way for these clubs to attract more paying players.
You're talking about Youngers and I was talking about olders. I don't believe Premier has olders.Sure, but Premier can barely field a competitive DA team. Their ECNL teams are trying to pull kids from flight 1 / gold, but aren't having much success.
You're talking about Youngers and I was talking about olders. I don't believe Premier has olders.
It starts to really matter at U16+, though U14/15 are a keen interest to them too.
Frankly, my observation is that there is no dilution in DA at U16/17 and U18/19 because USSF limits the number of clubs much more stringently. The Youngers has bigger pool because they are casting the net wider. Regardless of the skill and ability levels, life happens to all kids and many great young players quit for various reasons. So the younger pool is intentionally larger than older pool.
I saw the other day that Boys ECNL is sponsored by Puma.
And girls is Nike.
I’m no marketing genius, but that seems a bit strange.
There is dulition in ever league nowadays, DA is no different. 3-4yrs ago u16/17 was much different, fewer clubs in the league, fewer players, fewer leagues........
College recuitment with the right coaches, coordinators for high level teams with standout players with good grades happens in all leagues just about for the boys so hard to say there is much advantage. Play enough high level tournments and there is plenty of exposure IMO. The Oklahoma ecnl showcase or the DA one in Florida had a decent amt of coaches but the majority weren't from colleges people are interested in so is fun to travel & play but the bang of your bucks is often greater at other places such as Dallas Cup, Man City, etc.
DA (boys and girls) is going through a death by a thousands cuts up here, at least that is how it feels. However, in a best case you still have Reign, Sounders, Timbers, and Thorns at HS ages. Not sure what is left below HS, but at least those pros presumably have some money to pay for all that travel.
Unknowns -
Does Crossfire keep it a HS presence at boys DA?
Can Reign continue to draw talent in an unsubsidized academy with all that travel?
Do the Timbers cut bait on the whole DA thing, if MLS lets them?
As for Thorns, is the Cali girl going to play for the first team?
Yeah I know what your saying, but from USSF perspective, there's little dilution. The concentration of those with serious intent and talent is in DA (not to say that there isn't outside of it - of course there are but heavy concentration is in DA). Your comment applies from players perspective.
I have to disagree with this statement. Yes there are kids getting recruited everywhere outside of DA. That said, DA playoffs and showcases are very cost effective, focused source of player viewing for college coaches. It allows them to multiplex their travel budget significantly by attending the DA events. The fact that the clubs and USSF has already done the first level filtering to provide DA roster is a huge advantage in terms of leg work for college coaches. While Dallas Cup, Disney, Surf do attract lots of coaches, its in addition to, and not instead of DA playoffs and showcases.
As for colleges people aren't interested in at these events, that's a totally subjective comment from your perspective. The last DA playoff games our older kid played at had over 60 coaches watching along the sidelines from D1 to NAIA, Ivys to local universities (we know because the list was provided after the games). Besides, if you are interested in a particular school, clearly the best approach is to have direct contact so I suppose both of our points are moot.
This debate is definitely getting old. Everything you said about the DA is true for ECNL (at least for the girls side)........ It would be great if, after DA and ECNL championships they would have the final four play against each other for a true national championship - that would end the debate.
Bummer in Oregon, but it looks like boys DA has totally exited below u15. Lost 1 club last year, another announced this year they were discontinuing, and DA pulled plug for lack of interest. Washington seems less certain, but also on life support at those ages.
I genuinely think the region will miss the DA at these ages - standards and quality of matches were relatively higher. Obviously the control and perceived lack of fun (no cups to play for) were deterrents for some clubs.