Sheriff Joe
DA
You sure spend too much time worrying about me.
Climate and Weather
- Thread starter espola
- Start date
Multi Sport
DA
Why? I'm just paraphrasing what you posted, correct? If you don't agree then why did you post it?
Hüsker Dü
DA
It was a bit of a backhanded comment.
You enjoy projecting what you accuse others of... that's very entertaining.
Please keep your " Private " habits of amusement to yourself...
Thank You in advance for your Consideration.
Sheriff Joe
DA
California's 'green energy' central planners get their hands slapped by San Bernardino County
MARCH 2, 2019
The tiny desert communities of California decided they didn't want to be Sacramento's dumping ground for "green energy."
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...r_hands_slapped_by_san_bernardino_county.html
MARCH 2, 2019
The tiny desert communities of California decided they didn't want to be Sacramento's dumping ground for "green energy."
https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...r_hands_slapped_by_san_bernardino_county.html
Sheriff Joe
DA
Carbon Tax – How Can So Many Smart People Be So Wrong?
6 hours ago
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...IEAU&usg=AOvVaw3THQfCFG5N9dLRBls0H1FW&cf=1
6 hours ago
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...IEAU&usg=AOvVaw3THQfCFG5N9dLRBls0H1FW&cf=1
Sheriff Joe
DA
It's coming.If I was a leftist climate zealot, I'd tax the sun.
If I was a leftist climate zealot, I'd tax the sun.
Believe it or not, that's not the dumbest thing you have posted about the climate.
I love your cute phrases like “leftist climate zealot.” They make you sound so smart. But your true colors are never far from the surface, with words like “queer bait” and Nazi-influenced cartoons. Kinda like the way the proud boys wear nice khakis and stuff.If I was a leftist climate zealot, I'd tax the sun.
You like peter puffer better?
Pillow biter?
Leftist climate zealot is what you might be if you ever read a book.
Im just a humble turd herder.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Justifies Her MASSIVE Carbon Footprint: I'm Just 'Living In This World'
https://www.dailywire.com/news/44166/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-justifies-her-massive-emily-zanotti
https://www.dailywire.com/news/44166/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-justifies-her-massive-emily-zanotti
Coocoo.
Sheriff Joe
DA
roperties":{"pixelId
POLITICS
Meet The Ostriches Under Consideration For Trump’s Anti-Science Climate Panel
The list includes people who have called climate science a “cult” and claimed Earth benefits from burning fossil fuels.
By Chris D’Angelo
02/26/2019 05:45 AM ET
|
Updated 4 days ago
In its ongoing attempt to discredit decades of climate science, the Trump administration is reportedly reaching out to some of the most seasoned deniers on the circuit to join a new panel to present an alternative take on climate change.
As The Washington Post first reported Sunday, the administration is recruiting scientists and researchers to challenge the scientific consensus that climate change is an immediate crisis driven by the world’s addiction to fossil fuels. At the top of the committee’s target list will be the National Climate Assessment, a congressionally mandated report that scientists from 13 federal agencies released in November.
Advertisement
That report, which President Donald Trump said he doesn’t believe, concluded that planetary warming “could increase by 9°F (5°C) or more by the end of this century” without dramatic emission reductions.
The goal of this Presidential Committee on Climate Security will be to conduct “adversarial scientific peer review” of climate science, E&E News reported Monday, citing a leaked White House memo. For anyone who has followed the Republican-led effort to cast doubt on the climate crisis, the names that have emerged as possible panelists will be familiar.
Many have appeared at the congressional hearings Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), the former chair of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, organized to peddle climate misinformation and his own anti-science views.
Trump’s reported pick to lead the panel is William Happer, a retired Princeton physics professor with no expertise in climatology. E&E noted that those under consideration also include Judith Curry, a former professor at Georgia Tech’s School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences; John Christy, a professor of atmospheric science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville; and Richard Lindzen, a retired MIT professor.
Kert Davies, director of the Climate Investigations Center, told HuffPost that the early list of candidates would indicate that the White House has opted to turn to folks in academia rather than representatives of climate denial think tanks. Though that might make it seem like they have more credibility, all bring “different flavors of denial,” Davies said.
“These guys’ arguments are only held in high regard amongst a very small club of climate deniers,” he said. “They are not included in mainstream thinking about climate science. And they variously attack the temperature record or the modeling.”
POLITICS
Meet The Ostriches Under Consideration For Trump’s Anti-Science Climate Panel
The list includes people who have called climate science a “cult” and claimed Earth benefits from burning fossil fuels.
By Chris D’Angelo
02/26/2019 05:45 AM ET
|
Updated 4 days ago
In its ongoing attempt to discredit decades of climate science, the Trump administration is reportedly reaching out to some of the most seasoned deniers on the circuit to join a new panel to present an alternative take on climate change.
As The Washington Post first reported Sunday, the administration is recruiting scientists and researchers to challenge the scientific consensus that climate change is an immediate crisis driven by the world’s addiction to fossil fuels. At the top of the committee’s target list will be the National Climate Assessment, a congressionally mandated report that scientists from 13 federal agencies released in November.
Advertisement
That report, which President Donald Trump said he doesn’t believe, concluded that planetary warming “could increase by 9°F (5°C) or more by the end of this century” without dramatic emission reductions.
The goal of this Presidential Committee on Climate Security will be to conduct “adversarial scientific peer review” of climate science, E&E News reported Monday, citing a leaked White House memo. For anyone who has followed the Republican-led effort to cast doubt on the climate crisis, the names that have emerged as possible panelists will be familiar.
Many have appeared at the congressional hearings Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), the former chair of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, organized to peddle climate misinformation and his own anti-science views.
Trump’s reported pick to lead the panel is William Happer, a retired Princeton physics professor with no expertise in climatology. E&E noted that those under consideration also include Judith Curry, a former professor at Georgia Tech’s School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences; John Christy, a professor of atmospheric science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville; and Richard Lindzen, a retired MIT professor.
Kert Davies, director of the Climate Investigations Center, told HuffPost that the early list of candidates would indicate that the White House has opted to turn to folks in academia rather than representatives of climate denial think tanks. Though that might make it seem like they have more credibility, all bring “different flavors of denial,” Davies said.
“These guys’ arguments are only held in high regard amongst a very small club of climate deniers,” he said. “They are not included in mainstream thinking about climate science. And they variously attack the temperature record or the modeling.”
Humble? No. You should be, though. It’s funny how full of yourself you are, all things considered...
Interesting case - most of the plaintiff's evidence comes from the defendant's admissions and records.