Climate and Weather

espola said:
I know that question was not directed to me, but allow me to respond. That is the gist of the current scientific findings, based on work by Arrhenius over 100 years ago that was part of the work cited in his Nobel Prize award confirmed by careful observations made before and since then.

If you do not agree with any scientific finding or doctrine, the accepted way to change those is by some mathematical derivation or series of observations. Notable examples of such revolutions in scientific thought have been Newton's mathematical treatment of gravity, Einstein's special relativity mathematics (which explained why the Michelson-Morley experiments of a few years before had found no evidence of the "luminiferous ether"), and Wegener's compilation of geological observations that led to the modern theory of plate tectonics. If you don't have anything of that level of care and rigor, or you cannot cite someone who does, you are just displaying your ignorance and/or your willingness to be taken in by political hacks.
Click to expand...
You seem to believe you're smart.
I, on the other hand, have no formal education past the 9th grade.

Let me ask you a question.

Does the increase in co2 represented by human industry over the past 100 years or so directly affect the sea level?
 
Hüsker Dü said:
You are conversing with flat earth, the moon isn't real/so we never landed on it, Sandy Hook was a "red-flag"hoax performed by liberal operatives, the Parkland kids are all actors(and really horrible people), Clive Bundy is an American hero types. They see the likes of The National Enquired and Tucker Carlson as serious journalism.
Click to expand...
Another fine example of your comprehension problems....
 
messy said:
You’re both complete idiots. That’s the story with ignoramuses who deny science.
Click to expand...


You don't know/understand science........

n915388.jpg



The " Messy " Global Warming/Climate Change.......
 
Ricky Fandango said:
You seem to believe you're smart.
I, on the other hand, have no formal education past the 9th grade.

Let me ask you a question.

Does the increase in co2 represented by human industry over the past 100 years or so directly affect the sea level?
Click to expand...

That depends on what you mean by "directly". There are certainly indirect effects, but I don't know where you would draw the line.
 
espola said:
That depends on what you mean by "directly". There are certainly indirect effects, but I don't know where you would draw the line.
Click to expand...
The sea level.
Has anthropogenic warming affected the sea level?
Has the sea level risen at an unprecedented level, or at a level that would suggest an anthropogenic (induced) anomaly?
 
espola said:
Yes, really, and the answer is yes to the first one you asked, assuming a common definition of "directly".

global_average_sea_level_change.png


What did your twitter master tell you?
Click to expand...
That is an interesting chart.
How does it compare with the last 20,000 years?
Is it above or below average? ( sea level rise)

Seeing that we are inflaming the climate with our industrial co2, it must be off the charts (pun intended).
 
I follow a few anthropological sites.
One of them a couple years back had an incredible column on the Cosquer cave in southern France.
Ever heard of it?
 
Ricky Fandango said:
His opinion is that it's "settled science", like gravity.
He doesn't know why he believes that, other than he's been told by "experts".
Its a surprisingly common opinion.
Click to expand...
That's not my opinion at all. It is a fact that it's settled science.
But that's only among scientists.
I would accept your view that it's not settled science among plumbers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top