Bruddah IZ
DA
Sshhhh. Just sip your Folgers.More "free thinking"?
Sshhhh. Just sip your Folgers.More "free thinking"?
When are scientists not scientific?
1,600 “scientists” defy science to support transgender activism
JAZZ SHAW Posted at 6:31 pm on November 04, 2018
This story came out earlier this week but it was shocking enough that it bears a look. The transgender activist community was all abuzz on Thursday over a letter that had actually been featured in the New York Times a week earlier. Buzzfeed picked it up and ran with it, adding to the celebratory mood. The document in question was an open letter published by a gaggle of 1,600 scientists who are rejecting the anticipated HHS memo defining sex and gender in traditional, scientifically accepted terms for purposes of Title IX questions.
What’s truly amazing is the fact that these supposed pillars of the scientific community are calling on the Trump administration to reject such notions and formulate a policy which is more scientific and ethically based. (This Hill)
The memo states that any disputes about a person’s sex would be clarified using genetic testing, which scientists who signed the letter called unscientific and unethical.
“This proposal is fundamentally inconsistent not only with science, but also with ethical practices, human rights, and basic dignity,” the scientists wrote.
Among the signatories are eight Nobel laureates.
The letter emphasizes that both biological sex and gender are on a spectrum and are not clear cut.
The opposite of nationalism, then, isn't patriotism. It's internationalism, or the idea that all human beings share similar values, and that, therefore, borders and national interests are irrelevant. That philosophy is utterly foolish and dangerous. Simply view tape of thousands of radical Muslims marching in Pakistan to protest the acquittal of a Christian woman from charges of blasphemy and realize that not all people believe the same things.More "free thinking"?
Tell us all about it Dr E.I was really hoping there would be an opportunity here to discuss this research article without resorting to breathless quotes from the denialist media, but so far, I am wrong.
Tell us all about it Dr E.
![]()
![]()
Tell us all about it Dr E.
![]()
![]()
I was really hoping there would be an opportunity here to discuss this research article without resorting to breathless quotes from the denialist media, but so far, I am wrong.
I believe a question mark is in order.Hey LIAR......You return the STOLEN Golf Balls yet.
I believe a question mark is in order.
Makes perfect sense to me.His rehab ran out of personal " keystion " marks, so he just gets a " coloment " for now....
The media is denialist?I was really hoping there would be an opportunity here to discuss this research article without resorting to breathless quotes from the denialist media, but so far, I am wrong.