Games of the week 18-19....

I

Ironically, SDSC's coach has only been to one Sunday game this season. He is a university coach and has endless conflicts.

Ah maybe that's why he doesn't understand or apply the correct subbing rules?

Reenter in the same half is not allowed, the ref mistakenly thought the two SDSC players that went back in the second half where allowed, not the first ones to do this but you would hope the coaches would at least follow the rules according to friends we spoke to about this game.

Having a substitute coach is fine, no coach is tough but at least gives the players some experience in self starting and being ready to go no matter what the situation.
 
Yeah what is your points. The answers are very similar and I am not sure why mine was incorrect. Can someone explain why the second one is correct while the first is wrong or less correct?
I

Ironically, SDSC's coach has only been to one Sunday game this season. He is a university coach and has endless conflicts.
 
Ah maybe that's why he doesn't understand or apply the correct subbing rules?

Reenter in the same half is not allowed, the ref mistakenly thought the two SDSC players that went back in the second half where allowed, not the first ones to do this but you would hope the coaches would at least follow the rules according to friends we spoke to about this game.

Having a substitute coach is fine, no coach is tough but at least gives the players some experience in self starting and being ready to go no matter what the situation.[/QUOTE
Yeah I heard about that too, with the ref and the two subs, I don’t even think the ref himself know the rule too, mistakenly tow time in one half. Laughing loud at the referee.
 
Ah maybe that's why he doesn't understand or apply the correct subbing rules?

Reenter in the same half is not allowed, the ref mistakenly thought the two SDSC players that went back in the second half where allowed, not the first ones to do this but you would hope the coaches would at least follow the rules according to friends we spoke to about this game.

Having a substitute coach is fine, no coach is tough but at least gives the players some experience in self starting and being ready to go no matter what the situation.

you know a lot about strikers sc team.[/QUOTE]
 
you know a lot about strikers sc team.

Which strikers team(s) ? They have like 5-6 in this age group. My son's has a couple of friends on their different discovery teams and if they ever combined thinks they would be even better. The former galaxy, barc da player is on the Irvine team for those thinking it was the other one.
 
DA is back to local play this week, the NW/SW games last week where mixed/split results so the comp looks closer this year so far.

Saturday, October 20 2018
Strikers FC U-16/17 vs LA Galaxy U-16/17

Sunday, October 21 2018
FC Golden State U-16/17 vs Albion SC U-16/17

DSL is starting to bunch up for the top spots:
Pateadores - LA B2003 vs Arsenal FC 2003 USSDA

In CSL Oxnard is 5 pts clear on top but the race for the spots after that are very close:
TOTAL FUTBOL ACADEMY vs DMS11 ACADEMY B2003

FC GOLDEN STATE 2003 vs BOCA JRS LA B03 PREMIER
 
You paid all that money for what ?
I guess that we pay for excellent training sessions, awesome networking with the university for the boys, and great connections with other college coaches through him. We are all a little disappointed with the game day situation. But I guess that you can't have everything. And SDSC certainly isn't the most expensive club, for this teams level of competition, is San Diego.
 
I guess that we pay for excellent training sessions, awesome networking with the university for the boys, and great connections with other college coaches through him. We are all a little disappointed with the game day situation. But I guess that you can't have everything. And SDSC certainly isn't the most expensive club, for this teams level of competition, is San Diego.
You are correct , as long as the training is excellent your club can provide a knowledgeable backup coach. What if a coach has multiple teams , they are bound to miss some games. Its great to win league , but there is usually no college coaches. I feel CRL , National League , National Cup and Surf and LV showcases are more beneficial.
 
San Diego Soccer Club B2003 Academy Navy 3-1 Strikers FC - South Coast B03

Saw the DSL game. looks like SDSC has finally found their rhythm after a strong finish last year and a slow start this year. Strikers were over confident from the 10-0 blowout. The competition is pretty good, only five points separate the top 7 teams. Pats looks like they may be moving to number one spot soon. Game to watch next week:

Pateadores - LA B2003 vs Arsenal FC 2003 USSDA

Real So Cal B2003 ADT vs LA Galaxy San Diego B2003 Elite/Ritchie

Pateadores - LA B2003 1 Arsenal FC 2003 USSDA 0
 
I guess that we pay for excellent training sessions, awesome networking with the university for the boys, and great connections with other college coaches through him. We are all a little disappointed with the game day situation. But I guess that you can't have everything. And SDSC certainly isn't the most expensive club, for this teams level of competition, is San Diego.

Is this the same coach that allows players to be rostered & play on two separate teams at the same time with different clubs?

Box reports & game day rosters seem to indicate this is going on:
http://www.scdslsoccer.com/_element...rts/91742887/7594468.html?dummy=1540230284347

https://ecnl.totalglobalsports.com/Public/BoxScore.aspx?mid=97095

How many other teams in DSL are taking advantage of the lack oversight, or is it just a few coaches?
 
Is this the same coach that allows players to be rostered & play on two separate teams at the same time with different clubs?

Box reports & game day rosters seem to indicate this is going on:
http://www.scdslsoccer.com/_element_display/#/73496/MatchReports/91742887/7594468.html?dummy=1540230284347

https://ecnl.totalglobalsports.com/Public/BoxScore.aspx?mid=97095

How many other teams in DSL are taking advantage of the lack oversight, or is it just a few coaches?

This one is totally within the rules. The player in question can play ECNL with one club and SCDSL with another. If you look at other ECNL teams they are often doing the same. It allows the player to gain exposure to the ECNL college showcases etc and stay with their local club
 
I guess that we pay for excellent training sessions, awesome networking with the university for the boys, and great connections with other college coaches through him. We are all a little disappointed with the game day situation. But I guess that you can't have everything. And SDSC certainly isn't the most expensive club, for this teams level of competition, is San Diego.


This is not an indictment of SDSC. They are no better or worse than any other club BUT "excellent" training and "networking" with "the" university, that's funny!
I used to drink all that "Kool-Aid", also.
 
This one is totally within the rules. The player in question can play ECNL with one club and SCDSL with another. If you look at other ECNL teams they are often doing the same. It allows the player to gain exposure to the ECNL college showcases etc and stay with their local club

These are regular season league games.

Who's rules are you referring to? Cal south and DSL have there own set of rules especially on the same day.

Rules or not how is that reasonably for the rest of the players on those teams ? Taking advantage of loopholes to try to win more games sends what message to the players?
 
Is this the same coach that allows players to be rostered & play on two separate teams at the same time with different clubs?

Box reports & game day rosters seem to indicate this is going on:
http://www.scdslsoccer.com/_element_display/#/73496/MatchReports/91742887/7594468.html?dummy=1540230284347

https://ecnl.totalglobalsports.com/Public/BoxScore.aspx?mid=97095

How many other teams in DSL are taking advantage of the lack oversight, or is it just a few coaches?
Ok a most interesting comparison considering the player in question is by far the best player on the San Diego SC SCDSL Club. He basically runs the whole team from the back. Don't get me wrong as the SDSC team is strong but they are definitely taking advantage of the system here...
 
Ok a most interesting comparison considering the player in question is by far the best player on the San Diego SC SCDSL Club. He basically runs the whole team from the back. Don't get me wrong as the SDSC team is strong but they are definitely taking advantage of the system here...

Never seen them play but of course has to be like that.

Call it gaming the system or whatever but what surprises the most is there is two different clubs with different coaches involved who think this is ok? good example for all there normal paying players & customers?

The measues and steps some take to try to win youth sporting events is ridiculous sometimes.
 
These are regular season league games.

Who's rules are you referring to? Cal south and DSL have there own set of rules especially on the same day.

Rules or not how is that reasonably for the rest of the players on those teams ? Taking advantage of loopholes to try to win more games sends what message to the players?
The two games that you refer to were on different days and the DSL rules are clear that ECNl is not part of CAL South, so what is the infraction that you are seeing. The kid plays another game for another team with the risk of getting hurt and that somehow benefits his home team?


upload_2018-10-22_12-5-33.png
 
Ok a most interesting comparison considering the player in question is by far the best player on the San Diego SC SCDSL Club. He basically runs the whole team from the back. Don't get me wrong as the SDSC team is strong but they are definitely taking advantage of the system here...
I fail to see how SDSC is getting any benefit from letting one of their players play for an ECNL team.
 
The two games that you refer to were on different days and the DSL rules are clear that ECNl is not part of CAL South, so what is the infraction that you are seeing. The kid plays another game for another team with the risk of getting hurt and that somehow benefits his home team?

Look back to my original question? Why would your coach go along with this scheme in the first place?

Infraction or not of some loophole, why would anybody do this unless they thought it would give an advantage?

I regards to the ECNL club loyality rules don't know the specifics and there might be a loophole there as well for FT players from different clubs outside of discovery rules.
 
Back
Top