The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Nonononono said:
So your point is the physical appearance of a woman has bearing on her credibility in a Senate Judiciary hearing?

I’ve got a hunch you’re not going to be posting Grassley’s female assistant, if your mysognist history is our guide.
Click to expand...
You mean because Kav grinded Grassley’s female assistant too? You people crack me up.
 
espola said:
https://www.facebook.com/usaprogressive/photos/a.917375388424944/1136419579853856/?type=3&theater

42607817_1136419586520522_8442452866823618560_n.jpg
Click to expand...
That was after 7 years of taking it in the ass from Obama.
 
She claims she didn't know Grassley offered to go to her for her statement?
I knew that, you people knew that.
So, who didn't tell her or is she lying?
No 2 ways about it.
Feinstein is a known liar, pretty sure her lawyer wouldn't keep that little tidbit from her.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
WILD EYED LEFTIST!

Put some make up on for Christ's sake!
DoG0jFFXgAAJRk5.jpg
Click to expand...
Just so the record is clear. Since you posted this misogynistic, sexist, derogatory, irrelevant and shameless post to denegrade Dr. Ford, you’ve posted in this sub-thread alone (and I’m not going to bother counting other threads) ten posts that do not comment on the physical appearance of the career sex crimes prosecutor the Republican side of the Senate Judiciary surreptitiously retained weeks ago, and refused until late yesterday to either disclose, or was leaked, and therefore you had no knowledge of this career prosecutor to whom Chairman Grassley (R), openly referred before the press as his party’s side of the committee as their “female assistant”.

Let me take a leap of faith. If the mystery “female assistant” were Kimberly Gilfoyle, an accomplished and acclaimed former California prosecutor of sexual abuse crimes within her career, you’d have taken a moment to post her photograph instead of one of those 10 posts, or made it an eleventh in time period involved, isn’t that correct?
 
Nonononono said:
Just so the record is clear. Since you posted this misogynistic, sexist, derogatory, irrelevant and shameless post to denegrade Dr. Ford, you’ve posted in this sub-thread alone (and I’m not going to bother counting other threads) ten posts that do not comment on the physical appearance of the career sex crimes prosecutor the Republican side of the Senate Judiciary surreptitiously retained weeks ago, and refused until late yesterday to either disclose, or was leaked, and therefore you had no knowledge of this career prosecutor to whom Chairman Grassley (R), openly referred before the press as his party’s side of the committee as their “female assistant”.

Let me take a leap of faith. If the mystery “female assistant” were Kimberly Gilfoyle, an accomplished and acclaimed former California prosecutor of sexual abuse crimes within her career, you’d have taken a moment to post her photograph instead of one of those 10 posts, or made it an eleventh in time period involved, isn’t that correct?
Click to expand...
No, I don't think too much of KG.
 
Nonononono said:
Just so the record is clear. Since you posted this misogynistic, sexist, derogatory, irrelevant and shameless post to denegrade Dr. Ford, you’ve posted in this sub-thread alone (and I’m not going to bother counting other threads) ten posts that do not comment on the physical appearance of the career sex crimes prosecutor the Republican side of the Senate Judiciary surreptitiously retained weeks ago, and refused until late yesterday to either disclose, or was leaked, and therefore you had no knowledge of this career prosecutor to whom Chairman Grassley (R), openly referred before the press as his party’s side of the committee as their “female assistant”.

Let me take a leap of faith. If the mystery “female assistant” were Kimberly Gilfoyle, an accomplished and acclaimed former California prosecutor of sexual abuse crimes within her career, you’d have taken a moment to post her photograph instead of one of those 10 posts, or made it an eleventh in time period involved, isn’t that correct?
Click to expand...
You like dissimilar comparisons. Please go on.
 
Nonononono said:
Just so the record is clear. Since you posted this misogynistic, sexist, derogatory, irrelevant and shameless post to denegrade Dr. Ford, you’ve posted in this sub-thread alone (and I’m not going to bother counting other threads) ten posts that do not comment on the physical appearance of the career sex crimes prosecutor the Republican side of the Senate Judiciary surreptitiously retained weeks ago, and refused until late yesterday to either disclose, or was leaked, and therefore you had no knowledge of this career prosecutor to whom Chairman Grassley (R), openly referred before the press as his party’s side of the committee as their “female assistant”.

Let me take a leap of faith. If the mystery “female assistant” were Kimberly Gilfoyle, an accomplished and acclaimed former California prosecutor of sexual abuse crimes within her career, you’d have taken a moment to post her photograph instead of one of those 10 posts, or made it an eleventh in time period involved, isn’t that correct?
Click to expand...
Beauty comes from the inside.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top