The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Lawyer Caught On Camera: 'Going To Resist'...
https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/21/kavanaugh-lawyer-debra-katz-resist-rally/

S

KAVANAUGH ACCUSER’S LAWYER CAUGHT ON CAMERA: ‘WE ARE GOING TO RESIST’
3:24 PM 09/21/2018
Amber Athey | Media and Breaking News Editor

So she's a kook.
Debra Katz, one of the attorneys representing Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser, attended a resistance rally against the president in 2017 and promised to “fight back.”

WATCH:


Katz is representing Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who claims Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in the 1980s while the two were in high school.


SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
The lawyer has numerous ties to the resistance against Trump, and was caught on camera at a protest in February 2017 after Jeff Sessions was confirmed as the administration’s attorney general.

“We are going to fight back,” she told a reporter. “We are going to resist. We will not be silenced.”

Katz was identified only as a “protester” by ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

The Gargoyle, the alumni magazine for the University of Wisconsin Law School, profiled Katz on August 9, 2018 and found her to be just as committed to fighting the president as she was at the 2017 protest.

“The resistance is not going away, says Katz, and she is committed to being part of it,” the Gargoyle wrote.

“When I go to a march on behalf of Dreamers, I hear young people making connections between DACA and Islamophobia,” Katz told the magazine. “I hope that energy continues, to retake our democracy that is truly at risk now.”

Katz and her colleague Lisa Banks were also prepared to headline a fundraiser for Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin in October until they were asked about the event by CNN. Katz claimed the event was planned long before Dr. Ford came forward against Kavanaugh and referred to an invitation for the fundraiser sent out Thursday morning as an “old invite.” (RELATED: Kavanaugh Accuser’s Lawyers Pull Out Of Democratic Fundraiser)

The event was set to be held at the attorneys’ law firm.

“The short answer is this: We did a fundraiser for Sen. Baldwin six years ago when we ran for the Senate, we supported her then,” Katz told CNN. “We are not going to be doing a fundraiser now. We’re going to be focused on the issues involving the Kavanaugh confirmation process.”
 
Friesland said:
The one where the racist idiot reveals he does not understand the difference between a trial and a confirmation hearing.
Click to expand...
So at a trial one is presumed innocent until proven guilty & at a confirmation hearing one is presumed guilty until proven innocent?
Interesting.....
This goes a long way to understanding the PC left and their obsession with labeling folks racist, nazis, traitors, rapists...in their mind these folks are guilty until they PROVE themselves innocent.
Legal scholars one and all.
 
Lion Eyes said:
So at a trial one is presumed innocent until proven guilty & at a confirmation hearing one is presumed guilty until proven innocent?
Interesting.....
This goes a long way to understanding the PC left and their obsession with labeling folks racist, nazis, traitors, rapists...in their mind these folks are guilty until they PROVE themselves innocent.
Legal scholars one and all.
Click to expand...
We are talking to the Kevin Spacey sympathizer.
 
Lion Eyes said:
So at a trial one is presumed innocent until proven guilty & at a confirmation hearing one is presumed guilty until proven innocent?
Interesting.....
This goes a long way to understanding the PC left and their obsession with labeling folks racist, nazis, traitors, rapists...in their mind these folks are guilty until they PROVE themselves innocent.
Legal scholars one and all.
Click to expand...
Absurd. You, like racist Joe, simply don't understand or are willfully stupid.

A confirmation hearing is about suitability for the job and getting enough Senators to confirm you. That is why Merrick Garland, despite not having any proved or even alleged illegalities, was not confirmed: He couldn't get the votes in the Senate.

DKE Kav, right now, likely does not have the votes, or Grassley and McCreeper would shut this down. Or, at the very least, they believe the accusations (and other evidence) will prove damning enough that it will hurt GOP congress candidates in Nov.

If there was nothing here, and Grassley and McCreeper were confident of no fallout, they would hold the vote. But there is absolutely 0 precedent that executive branch nominees must be given judicial level due process for confirmation. Not getting promoted from a federal judgeship to Scotus is in no way the same as taking a person's liberty or causing financial pain (ie. fines.) To not understand that is to be, truly, as dumb as a rock.
 
Another thing:

Remind your D's not to accept smoothies from Jason Miller...

Oh, and Dr. Ford is going to show. It will be very interesting.
 
Friesland said:
Absurd. You, like racist Joe, simply don't understand or are willfully stupid.

A confirmation hearing is about suitability for the job and getting enough Senators to confirm you. That is why Merrick Garland, despite not having any proved or even alleged illegalities, was not confirmed: He couldn't get the votes in the Senate.

DKE Kav, right now, likely does not have the votes, or Grassley and McCreeper would shut this down. Or, at the very least, they believe the accusations (and other evidence) will prove damning enough that it will hurt GOP congress candidates in Nov.

If there was nothing here, and Grassley and McCreeper were confident of no fallout, they would hold the vote. But there is absolutely 0 precedent that executive branch nominees must be given judicial level due process for confirmation. Not getting promoted from a federal judgeship to Scotus is in no way the same as taking a person's liberty or causing financial pain (ie. fines.) To not understand that is to be, truly, as dumb as a rock.
Click to expand...
So Mr babbler, will he be confirmed?
 
Friesland said:
Absurd. You, like racist Joe, simply don't understand or are willfully stupid.

A confirmation hearing is about suitability for the job and getting enough Senators to confirm you. That is why Merrick Garland, despite not having any proved or even alleged illegalities, was not confirmed: He couldn't get the votes in the Senate.

DKE Kav, right now, likely does not have the votes, or Grassley and McCreeper would shut this down. Or, at the very least, they believe the accusations (and other evidence) will prove damning enough that it will hurt GOP congress candidates in Nov.

If there was nothing here, and Grassley and McCreeper were confident of no fallout, they would hold the vote. But there is absolutely 0 precedent that executive branch nominees must be given judicial level due process for confirmation. Not getting promoted from a federal judgeship to Scotus is in no way the same as taking a person's liberty or causing financial pain (ie. fines.) To not understand that is to be, truly, as dumb as a rock.
Click to expand...
Fuck you.
You are the one that doesn't understand. You arrogant piece of shit.
The only thing this man has going against him is that Trump nominated him...

Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh is “well qualified” to hold a seat on the Supreme Court, the American Bar Association said Friday, giving President Trump’s nominee another boost heading into next week’s confirmation hearing.

The ABA’s federal judiciary committee gave its unanimous rating to Judge Kavanaugh, who has sat for a dozen years on the circuit court of appeals in Washington, earning high marks for his approach to judging.

Though conservatives don’t put as much stock in the rating from the liberal-leaning ABA, Democrats have called it the “gold standard” for evaluating whether a judge should be confirmed.

The rating is based on peer reviews and evaluations, and judges candidates on their integrity, professional competence and judicial temperament. It does not consider ideology, philosophy or political affiliation.

A spokesperson from the ABA will testify at Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing about his evaluation next Friday.

ABA also gave Mr. Trump’s first nominee to the high court Justice Neil M. Gorsuch a unanimous well-qualified rating.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/aug/31/american-bar-association-gives-brett-kavanaugh-una/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top