From Russia With Love

17 hours, 8 minutes. That’s the time since any Trump lover here posted anything in the “From Russia with Love” relating to the Trump campaign conspiring with Russia to influence the 2016 election. And that includes a group of fellas with tens of thousands of collective posts defending Trump’s shit having absolutely no foul odor.

I guess nothing has happened in the Democrat created, led, and illegally operating witch hunt over these past 17 plus hours.

When you get your talking points circulated, don’t forget the key terms:
Rat, Stool Pigeon, Turncoat, Fink, Singing, Flipped, and Only worked on campaign in a very minor capacity for only a few hours, mostly handling inter/office mail delivery and tidying up the office kitchen.
 
I wonder if “broad cooperation” in cooperating with DOJ prosecutors in pleading guilty to ten charges that were previously “hung” as well as another full blown federal criminal trial far more ominous for a defendant, following a proffer of all he knows, has and will truthfully testify to, which the DOJ accepted, leads to substantial corroborating evidence concerning anyone at a level above the Chairman of the Trump Presidential Committee?

Not that there actually is anyone above the Chair of the Committee to Elect Donald Trump for President, right?
 
Nonononono said:
I wonder if “broad cooperation” in cooperating with DOJ prosecutors in pleading guilty to ten charges that were previously “hung” as well as another full blown federal criminal trial far more ominous for a defendant, following a proffer of all he knows, has and will truthfully testify to, which the DOJ accepted, leads to substantial corroborating evidence concerning anyone at a level above the Chairman of the Trump Presidential Committee?

Not that there actually is anyone above the Chair of the Committee to Elect Donald Trump for President, right?
Click to expand...
Manafort wasn't with the campaign for long . . . minor player, small role . . . didn't even get paid . . . the $17 mil+ he owes to Oleg Deripaska, and others is of no consideration whatsoever . . . no apparent outside influence.
 
Wow so the Make America Great guy actually it turns out- invited a bunch of Russian spies on into the White House. No wonder all you Trump or Die nutters are hiding from this topic. This has to be embarrassing for you guys.

Since my Republican friends in here have said they don't like political correctness- let me ask the politically incorrect question. What do you think it took to buy Trump? Sounds like Manaford cost about $20 Million to buy. My guess is Trump was more...
 
tenacious said:
Wow so the Make America Great guy actually it turns out- invited a bunch of Russian spies on into the White House. No wonder all you Trump or Die nutters are hiding from this topic. This has to be embarrassing for you guys.

Since my Republican friends in here have said they don't like political correctness- let me ask the politically incorrect question. What do you think it took to buy Trump? Sounds like Manaford cost about $20 Million to buy. My guess is Trump was more...
Click to expand...
443f0d_trump-russia-probe-manafort-39885-paul-manafort-in-feb-14-2018-file-photo-e1537016186984.jpg

The Associated Press
JOHN NOLTE 15 Sep 2018


According to NPR, Paul Manafort’s deal with Special Counsel Robert Muller’s office “does not include matters involving the Trump campaign.”


Something rarely brought up by our utterly useless but still corrupt establishment media is that in order for someone to “flip,” that someone has to have the goods on someone else. In other words, if you want to deal your way out of prison time, you have to have something to deal with; you actually have to serve someone’s head up on a platter.

Nevertheless, all throughout the Russian Collusion Hoax, and every time someone agrees to “cooperate” with Mueller, the media squee like the 14-year-old girls they all are and then intentionally mislead the public by matter-of-factly saying, “This is bad news for Trump.”

Well, no, actually it is not.

The only way someone “flipping” is bad news for Trump is if he has indeed done something illegal, and as of right now, after nearly three years of 24/7 scrutiny at the hands of a beyond-corrupt FBI, two years of scrutiny from a rabidly partisan media, two congressional investigations, and 18 months of an unaccountable fishing expedition by a herd of Democrat Dirty Cops in the special counsel office, they got exactly zippo.


In other words, so far none of these so-called flippers has flipped on Trump.

One wonders how many other politicians could weather the kind of scrutiny Trump is facing

Hell, one wonders how many so-called journalists could survive this kind of fisk.

Answer: not many.

Sure, the Resistance desperately holds on to the hope Mueller is sitting on a bombshell, but another interesting factoid the media only dutifully reported is that Mueller has agreed to accept written answers from Trump on the issue of collusion and is not asking any questions about the media’s other hoax — obstruction.

This is a massive climb down on Mueller’s part, a special counsel who has so far only indicted people for committing the terrible crime of “associating with Trump” — meaning, process crimes (lying to authorities *yawn*) and old crimes that have nothing to do with Trump (crimes no one was interested in before the aforementioned Trump association).

Then there is the matter of leaks. Does anyone honestly believe evidence of Trump committing a crime would not have leaked by now?

But guess what has leaked? Oh, sure, in-between the 24/7 partisan wishcasting coming from the media about Manafort “flipping” on Trump, there has been some dutiful coverage about what the Manafort deal might really mean, and the news is not good for Democrats.
 
Continued,


Ken Vogel, a Democrat-operative who plays the role of “reporter” at the far-left New York Times, has been forced to report that powerful Democrats linked to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama might be in the Mueller crosshairs.


That is “Podesta” as in Tony Podesta, brother of John Podesta, who served as Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign chairman.


That is “Greg Craig” as in “Greg Craig former White House Counsel to … Barack Obama.”

Naturally, like the good little Democrat he is, Vogel is already trying to rescue Podesta, but here we are, 18 months into the Mueller investigation, two years into the media investigations, and nearly three years into the breathtakingly corrupt FBI’s investigations, and they got nothing.

Wouldn’t it be something if, like the #MeToo movement, this whole Russian Collusion Hoax blew up in the smug face of Democrats?

#MeToo was all about taking down Trump, about making the misconduct allegations against him so toxic he would be forced to resign. But the only people who have lost their reputations and careers are some 150 members of two of the most left-wing institutions in America — the establishment media and Hollywood.

For his part, Mueller has to justify the fact he has allowed a cloud to hang over the presidency for 18 months. What if his only way to do that is to bring down powerful Democrats? What if the only way for Mueller to fold-up his witch hunt with any dignity is with the head of a Podesta on that platter?

In a way this has already happened. While Trump sits in the Oval Office, it is former FBI Director James Comey who is unemployed and disgraced, as are some half-dozen of his hideous cronies.

Well, as a failed president likes to say when he misquotes Rev. Martin Luther King, “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.”
 
espola said:
People are going to be laughing at you for the rest of your life.
Click to expand...
He's not just raising his hand when asked who is brainwashed he's doing jumping jacks . . . but then again amongst the nutter lemmings most dedicated (brainwashed) is a thing they vie for.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
He's not just raising his hand when asked who is brainwashed he's doing jumping jacks . . . but then again amongst the nutter lemmings most dedicated (brainwashed) is a thing they vie for.
Click to expand...

If you're among those who only read Breitbart and watch Fox News you don't know the difference.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
443f0d_trump-russia-probe-manafort-39885-paul-manafort-in-feb-14-2018-file-photo-e1537016186984.jpg

The Associated Press
JOHN NOLTE 15 Sep 2018


According to NPR, Paul Manafort’s deal with Special Counsel Robert Muller’s office “does not include matters involving the Trump campaign.”


Something rarely brought up by our utterly useless but still corrupt establishment media is that in order for someone to “flip,” that someone has to have the goods on someone else. In other words, if you want to deal your way out of prison time, you have to have something to deal with; you actually have to serve someone’s head up on a platter.

Nevertheless, all throughout the Russian Collusion Hoax, and every time someone agrees to “cooperate” with Mueller, the media squee like the 14-year-old girls they all are and then intentionally mislead the public by matter-of-factly saying, “This is bad news for Trump.”

Well, no, actually it is not.

The only way someone “flipping” is bad news for Trump is if he has indeed done something illegal, and as of right now, after nearly three years of 24/7 scrutiny at the hands of a beyond-corrupt FBI, two years of scrutiny from a rabidly partisan media, two congressional investigations, and 18 months of an unaccountable fishing expedition by a herd of Democrat Dirty Cops in the special counsel office, they got exactly zippo.


In other words, so far none of these so-called flippers has flipped on Trump.

One wonders how many other politicians could weather the kind of scrutiny Trump is facing

Hell, one wonders how many so-called journalists could survive this kind of fisk.

Answer: not many.

Sure, the Resistance desperately holds on to the hope Mueller is sitting on a bombshell, but another interesting factoid the media only dutifully reported is that Mueller has agreed to accept written answers from Trump on the issue of collusion and is not asking any questions about the media’s other hoax — obstruction.

This is a massive climb down on Mueller’s part, a special counsel who has so far only indicted people for committing the terrible crime of “associating with Trump” — meaning, process crimes (lying to authorities *yawn*) and old crimes that have nothing to do with Trump (crimes no one was interested in before the aforementioned Trump association).

Then there is the matter of leaks. Does anyone honestly believe evidence of Trump committing a crime would not have leaked by now?

But guess what has leaked? Oh, sure, in-between the 24/7 partisan wishcasting coming from the media about Manafort “flipping” on Trump, there has been some dutiful coverage about what the Manafort deal might really mean, and the news is not good for Democrats.
Click to expand...
Interesting, but irrelevant. Sorry. The way facts work is not complicated.

First, they are not opinions. Neither are they hearsay, with several well reasoned exceptions.

Most importantly, reading the actual court proceedings as to what Manafort has committed to do, under oath, following a lengthy assertion of the terms of the multiple felonies to which he willingly and competently pleaded guilty makes any reporting by any news organization nothing more than opinion. You copied and pasted an opinion piece from a well respected left leaning radio news organization.

“Broad cooperation” feels self-explanatory. So does “grab’em by the pussy”. At least to rational people regardless of political ideology.

If you read the court documents, and see something that expressly excludes Manafort’s broad cooperation from any Russian conspiracy with the Trump campaign to seek to influence the election, I look forward to your direct quote(s) of such limitations to his broad cooperation.
 
Nonononono said:
Interesting, but irrelevant. Sorry. The way facts work is not complicated.

First, they are not opinions. Neither are they hearsay, with several well reasoned exceptions.

Most importantly, reading the actual court proceedings as to what Manafort has committed to do, under oath, following a lengthy assertion of the terms of the multiple felonies to which he willingly and competently pleaded guilty makes any reporting by any news organization nothing more than opinion. You copied and pasted an opinion piece from a well respected left leaning radio news organization.

“Broad cooperation” feels self-explanatory. So does “grab’em by the pussy”. At least to rational people regardless of political ideology.

If you read the court documents, and see something that expressly excludes Manafort’s broad cooperation from any Russian conspiracy with the Trump campaign to seek to influence the election, I look forward to your direct quote(s) of such limitations to his broad cooperation.
Click to expand...
"Interesting, but irrelevant."
The crimes he is guilty of were committed before or during his involvement in the campaign?
Interesting and relevant.
 
Lion Eyes said:
"Interesting, but irrelevant."
The crimes he is guilty of were committed before or during his involvement in the campaign?
Interesting and relevant.
Click to expand...

More interesting and relevant is his possible knowledge of crimes committed by members of the t family and staff, about which knowledge he would now be legally bound to testify.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top