MakeAPlay
DA
Yes.
That's what one would say if they weren't building something bigger. Those that don't understand just can't or choose not to. Let's see how their style of soccer works in the tournament.
Yes.
I didn't watch the game, so I don't know the means Colorado used. Were they cheating or just playing ugly?
Looks like it was top of the box to me. I didn't say it was inside the top of the box. Goal is about 33 seconds into the clip.
And I'm not alone. http://www.cubuffs.com/news/2016/10...-second-consecutive-win-over-top-10-team.aspx
At any rate, great contribution.
I guess so since all teams are ranked. But I wasn't using past tense and I was referring to teams ranked in the top 25. And as of today, UCLA hasn't beaten a single team ranked in the current top 25. Last week Pepperdine was in the top 25, so at least UCLA could point to that solid win . . . not anymore. Maybe UCLA can get it done against USC. USC isn't overrated, so no chance of USC dropping out of the 25 by the end of the year.
You think UCLA gets to pick the Blue Chippers before Stanford? I don't agree, everything being equal, GPA, test scores and scholarship offer. I say Stanford gets to pick first.
Thank you USC administration for providing an adequate home field that we've never played on when the team is in form. This one is on you. Congrats to the Bruins.
Well your reasoning of UCLA not beating a team in the current top 25 flew out the window!I guess so since all teams are ranked. But I wasn't using past tense and I was referring to teams ranked in the top 25. And as of today, UCLA hasn't beaten a single team ranked in the current top 25. Last week Pepperdine was in the top 25, so at least UCLA could point to that solid win . . . not anymore. Maybe UCLA can get it done against USC. USC isn't overrated, so no chance of USC dropping out of the 25 by the end of the year.
Oh but #3 for USC and #2 for UCLA stood out in this game. UCLA was overall quicker to the ball this time. But still SC had more chances.I was at the game and USC just missed their opportunities. Period. They created many more than UCLA. And neither team looked great.
I thought Andrews #3 for USC didn't have her best game. She failed to connect on a few opportunities in the attacking 3rd. Alvarado had her best game all season. USC was also having a hard time stopping UCLA's left forward. The larger field benefited UCLA because they are the better possession team.Oh but #3 for USC and #2 for UCLA stood out in this game. UCLA was overall quicker to the ball this time. But still SC had more chances.
I guess I should keep my day job...Getting back to soccer, I am looking forward to this weekend's final regular season match ups. Here are my predictions (winners in green):
I really don't care about anybody else.
- UCLA vs. USC - Given recent play, it would be foolish of anybody to bet against USC at this point. I do think it will be a tight match though.
- Cal vs. Stanford - I know that I am not a fan of Cal but the total Cal move is to lose to those you should smash and beat those you should lose to so with that logic in mind, I am going with Cal. I've got a funny feeling about this one...
- Colorado vs. Utah - I'm giving the slight edge to Utah. Utah tied USC and USC smashed Colorado so logic would dictate a Utah win.
- Pepperdine vs. Pacific - Despite having a decent sushi restaurant (Cocoro), Stockton is the arm pit of California. Pepperdine wins.
- LMU vs... - Nevermind.
- BYU vs. Gonzaga - Rest your starters BYU
- Santa Clara vs. San Francisco - Would love to see SF pull off the upset but they just don't have the firepower this year.
You're on.
Big bottle of Tito's on the line.
Just so we're on the same page, I got USC.
I said a "big bottle".![]()
Oh boy does that look good....
Brother B, where art thou?
Im with you.Not a hater, watches the second half. Saw a strong athletic UCLA side hold off several highly technical yet unlucky attacks from USC. I had USC in this match so I'm down a few bucks but I still maintain it was the match of the conference and it was.
How did I miss that????Fleming played most of the game so I am a little confused with this one.
Not a hater, watches the second half. Saw a strong athletic UCLA side hold off several highly technical yet unlucky attacks from USC. I had USC in this match so I'm down a few bucks but I still maintain it was the match of the conference and it was.
I was at the game and USC just missed their opportunities. Period. They created many more than UCLA. And neither team looked great.
Im with you.
Not a hater, just a fan of big games.
I honestly like SC's defense and the dynamic creativity of UCLA's offense.
Both great teams.
Im with you.
Not a hater, just a fan of big games.
I honestly like SC's defense and the dynamic creativity of UCLA's offense.
Both great teams.
I said a "big bottle".
The one in your picture is the petite size.
PM me and we can figure out how to get you paid.
I thought UCLA clearly won the first half, and USC did their best to equalize in the second half, but came up short.
Cant figure out why LP didnt play until the 43d minute.
It was a good game.