A supposed adult who discusses little girls' underwear or who doesn't accept responsibility when caught trying to circumvent rules deserves nothing less than to be treated with contempt.
Q.E.D.
A supposed adult who discusses little girls' underwear or who doesn't accept responsibility when caught trying to circumvent rules deserves nothing less than to be treated with contempt.
Muhahahahahahaaaaaaa!!!!!Q.E.D.
Muhahahahahahaaaaaaa!!!!!
If you're talking about CT scan, I don't think those can determine why one has contempt for perverts. Not yet anyway.Have you had that CAT scan yet? Can't you get one for free?
If you're talking about CT scan, I don't think those can determine why one has contempt for perverts. Not yet anyway.
You must obviously think having contempt for perverts is a bad thing.After a period of relatively harmless behavior, it is inevitable that JaP will revert to character, thus reminding long-time forum readers (and informing new readers) of his true nature.
You must obviously think having contempt for perverts is a bad thing.
In fact, as much as I have tried to, I have yet to find anyone or met anyone who has ever met any adult who talks about little girls' underwear. Not one. In that, you are unique. To say I have contempt for you is to grossly underestimate my opinion of you.I have contempt for those who post lies about others who have committed no offense other than to point out your lies.
In fact, as much as I have tried to, I have yet to find anyone or met anyone who has ever met any adult who talks about little girls' underwear. Not one. In that, you are unique. To say I have contempt for you is to grossly underestimate my opinion of you.
I remember the threads well. No one then or since, mentioned little girls' underwear except you. You're uniquely talented in that.So you missed that whole thread (actually, I think there were several) where parents complained about referees at State Cup making their children change their underwear before they could play? I assume that if they were parents of State-Cup-age children, then they were adults.
I remember the threads well. No one then or since, mentioned little girls' underwear except you. You're uniquely talented in that.
No one means exactly that. No one.So they talked about it, but didn't mention it? Did they have JaP-word-game training?
As long as we are on the topic, do you recall what your response was when I stated that the color of little girls' underwear was none of the referee's business?
No one means exactly that. No one.
I remember treating your little girls' underwear obsession with the contempt it deserved. Do you remember it differently?
Is this your way of trying to run away from your perversion?Did you have any contempt for the referees that were embarrassing the children on the fields and pissing off their parents?
Is this your way of trying to run away from your perversion?
Did I mention my contempt for people who do not accept responsibility for their actions?
The fact is, you are the first and only supposed ed adult to have mentioned little girls' underwear in any conversation on any topic. Those are your exact words.The whole conversation started with my agreeing with those parents' complaints about the referee behavior. You avoided that criticism by accusing me of perversion, just as you are doing here now.
Have you no shame? (Why do I ask such a pointless question?)
The fact is, you are the first and only supposed ed adult to have mentioned little girls' underwear in any conversation on any topic. Those are your exact words.
See what I mean? What adult talks about little girls' underwear? You are a contemptible, sick, for lack of a better word, man.The color of little girls' underwear is none of the referee's business.
Do you agree or disagree?
See what I mean? What adult talks about little girls' underwear? You are a contemptible, sick, for lack of a better word, man.
Maybe you two can start your own thread this whole conversation is weird and sounds personal