Essential Economics for Politicians

Laced said:
You'd be absolutely right if I were trying to change minds
Click to expand...

It's not even that, BIZ will ask you a million questions, as if he is carefully contemplating and forming thoughtful responses, but than just comes up with nothing and he'll resent you for not agreeing with him....
 
Wez said:
It's not even that, BIZ will ask you a million questions, as if he is carefully contemplating and forming thoughtful responses, but than just comes up with nothing and he'll resent you for not agreeing with him....
Click to expand...
I did notice that his argument tends to be more complex than it need be. And he cites a lot of facts (which I dispute) and I have trouble figuring out how they even relate to the point he's making. However, it's been civil and respectful between us. It's been vigorous but pleasant.
 
Laced said:
I did notice that his argument tends to be more complex than it need be. And he cites a lot of facts (which I dispute) and I have trouble figuring out how they even relate to the point he's making.
Click to expand...

He'll cut and paste non-sequiturs all day long...

Laced said:
However, it's been civil and respectful between us. It's been vigorous but pleasant.
Click to expand...

Until you really start to probe and question his convictions and call BS on them....resentment time...
 
Wez said:
He'll cut and paste non-sequiturs all day long...



Until you really start to probe and question his convictions and call BS on them....resentment time...
Click to expand...
I did learn something. To my surprise more people than I expected dispute that the Feds is a government agency, which I took for granted given that the Federal Reserve itself states so - not just the BOG. After a little research, I found that a significant minority has that view.
 
Laced said:
I did learn something. To my surprise more people than I expected dispute that the Feds is a government agency, which I took for granted given that the Federal Reserve itself states so - not just the BOG. After a little research, I found that a significant minority has that view.
Click to expand...
You will find that, "significant minority" is overly represented in here.
 
Laced said:
Factual inaccuracies aside, how does any of what you said support your argument that there should be less government intervention and more free market?
Click to expand...
I actually think that there should be more government intervention. Government should outlaw fiat money and fractional banking. The chances of that happening is almost nil. "Fragile by Design" by Charles Calomiris does a nice job of describing the cyclical incentives that politicians face when dealing with the reality of the Feds operations. The only thing that will stop "money printing" is the complete devaluing of the dollar.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
I actually think that there should be more government intervention. Government should outlaw fiat money and fractional banking. The chances of that happening is almost nil. "Fragile by Design" by Charles Calomiris does a nice job of describing the cyclical incentives that politicians face when dealing with the reality of the Feds operations. The only thing that will stop "money printing" is the complete devaluing of the dollar.
Click to expand...
You basically share Peter Schiff's view.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
The fringe economist have an antiquated view of the market because they know Roman history. The Fed like Rome is debasing the U.S. dollar through the creation of fiat money. Caesar did it buy clipping gold coins, melting the clippings to create more coins, albeit of a lesser weight, to pay for the expenses of the massive Roman Empire. As these coins circulated throughout Roman Markets, merchants demanded additional gold coins to meet the original weight requirements of a gold coin to say buy a basket of fish that cost a single gold coin last week! How's that for antiquated inflation? The Roman people started to notch their original unclipped coins to tell the difference because Caesar, instead of clipping coins was now just shaving the coins. In response, whatever gold coins Caesar collected in taxes he would have them fully melted, adding a baser metal this time, hence the term debasing, to meet the weight requirements. Eventually, it was a debased currency that destroyed an 800 year old empire.

An antiquated view of the market? Is there a fundamental difference?
Click to expand...
I think we understand "antiquated" differently. "Antiquated" to me means outdated. It doesn't reflect the reality of modern economic reality. It has a negative connotation. You seem to understand it to mean something totally different.
 
Wez said:
It's not even that, BIZ will ask you a million questions, as if he is carefully contemplating and forming thoughtful responses, but than just comes up with nothing and he'll resent you for not agreeing with him....
Click to expand...

I love Sarekʻs answer to how they should respond to the menacing probe that is vacuming the ocean in search of Humpback whales. You have to get some understanding. Some wisdom as opposed to Wezdumb. Now scram and stop looking for sympathizers

 
Laced said:
I did notice that his argument tends to be more complex than it need be. And he cites a lot of facts (which I dispute) and I have trouble figuring out how they even relate to the point he's making. However, it's been civil and respectful between us. It's been vigorous but pleasant.
Click to expand...
You found my response complex? I was just scratching the surface!! No wonder you have disputes. Lets dig deeper. We have awhile before we get down to the depth of Wezʻs rabbit hole.
 
Laced said:
I did learn something. To my surprise more people than I expected dispute that the Feds is a government agency, which I took for granted given that the Federal Reserve itself states so - not just the BOG. After a little research, I found that a significant minority has that view.
Click to expand...
I am willing to concede that they are an unfunded agency. Itʻs that they operate without any operational mandates from our elected officials.
 
Laced said:
I think we understand "antiquated" differently. "Antiquated" to me means outdated. It doesn't reflect the reality of modern economic reality. It has a negative connotation. You seem to understand it to mean something totally different.
Click to expand...
Macroeconomics is timeless when discussing the underlying principles that guide markets. Specifically, monetary policy, supply and demand, and inflation. Please be more specific about what you consider "modern economic reality"
 
Schiff is too bearish, most of the time. He is too pessimistic, so he misses a lot of growth opportunities. Over the long term, he has been a very poor money manager. I don't fault bearishness, there are plenty of reasons to be, but you can't let it control you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top