Climate and Weather

News Flash it's been warmer.
It's been cooler....almost cyclical.
Which do you prefer?
Hey, I believe scientists. They inform us. My preference is irrelevant. Dipshits believe there was massive flooding and Noah saved the animals by building an ark. You’re probably one of them.
 
Hey, I believe scientists. They inform us. My preference is irrelevant. Dipshits believe there was massive flooding and Noah saved the animals by building an ark. You’re probably one of them.
Fuck you ass wipe....
I believe in science, I believe the earth is getting warmer.
Nothing I said goes against science ass wipe...
Science and faith are not necessarily opposed...even a a dick head like you should understand that....
 
Fuck you ass wipe....
I believe in science, I believe the earth is getting warmer.
Nothing I said goes against science ass wipe...
Science and faith are not necessarily opposed...even a a dick head like you should understand that....

That reads like a yes on Noah and the ark.
 
That reads like a yes on Noah and the ark.
Oh Magoo..of course it does.
Faith tells me it happened, but I do have my doubts.
Why x10 brought the arc into conversation is beyond me.
If we were in court an objection regarding relevance would have been entered.

For what it's worth:
Noah's Ark 'could have happened', scientists say
New study shows giant boat could have carried all world's species of animal without sinking

The story of Noah may seem like an impossible legend, but scientists have calculated that the Ark could indeed have floated - even with two of every animal on board.

Establishing the precise dimensions of the huge boat based on God's instructions according to The Bible, postgraduate physics students at the University of Leicester worked out that it would have been buoyant enough to be fit for purpose.

Previous studies have estimated that Noah would have been required to save around 35,000 species of animals living at the time on planet Earth....

....Using approximate animal weights and some basic physics principles, they found that such a vessel could have stayed afloat with 70,000 animals on board.

Student Benjamin Jordan, 21, from Bury St Edmonds, told the Telegraph: "Using the dimensions of the Ark and the density of the water, we were able to calculate its buoyancy force, which, according to Archimedes’ principle, is equal to the weight of the volume of fluid the object displaces.

"This meant we were then able to estimate the total mass the Ark could support before the gravitational weight would overcome the buoyancy force, causing the Ark to sink."

His fellow student Thomas Morris, 22, from Chelmsford, said: "You don’t think of the Bible necessarily as a scientifically accurate source of information, so I guess we were quite surprised when we discovered it would work. We’re not proving that it’s true, but the concept would definitely work."

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/noahs-ark-could-have-happened-scientists-say-9234799.html
 
Last edited:
Oh Magoo..of course it does.
Faith tells me it happened, but I do have my doubts.
Why x10 brought the arc into conversation is beyond me.
If we were in court an objection regarding relevance would have been entered.

For what it's worth:
Noah's Ark 'could have happened', scientists say
New study shows giant boat could have carried all world's species of animal without sinking

The story of Noah may seem like an impossible legend, but scientists have calculated that the Ark could indeed have floated - even with two of every animal on board.

Establishing the precise dimensions of the huge boat based on God's instructions according to The Bible, postgraduate physics students at the University of Leicester worked out that it would have been buoyant enough to be fit for purpose.

Previous studies have estimated that Noah would have been required to save around 35,000 species of animals living at the time on planet Earth....

....Using approximate animal weights and some basic physics principles, they found that such a vessel could have stayed afloat with 70,000 animals on board.

Student Benjamin Jordan, 21, from Bury St Edmonds, told the Telegraph: "Using the dimensions of the Ark and the density of the water, we were able to calculate its buoyancy force, which, according to Archimedes’ principle, is equal to the weight of the volume of fluid the object displaces.

"This meant we were then able to estimate the total mass the Ark could support before the gravitational weight would overcome the buoyancy force, causing the Ark to sink."

His fellow student Thomas Morris, 22, from Chelmsford, said: "You don’t think of the Bible necessarily as a scientifically accurate source of information, so I guess we were quite surprised when we discovered it would work. We’re not proving that it’s true, but the concept would definitely work."

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/noahs-ark-could-have-happened-scientists-say-9234799.html

Did you know the word "gullible" does not appear in any on-line dictionary?
 
Did you know the word "gullible" does not appear in any on-line dictionary?
As I said I have doubts..you miss that part of the post?
I'm sure dementia does appear in on line dictionary's
Along with arrogant & pompous and condescending...
You have about 15 more minutes 'till lights out....
 
Last edited:
As I said I have doubts..you miss that part of the post?
I'm sure dementia does appear in on line dictionary's
Along with arrogant & pompous and condescending...
You have about 15 more minutes 'till lights out....

You have really been making a fool of yourself the last couple of days.

Please continue.
 
Hey, I believe scientists. They inform us. My preference is irrelevant. Dipshits believe there was massive flooding and Noah saved the animals by building an ark. You’re probably one of them.
"I believe stuff because smart people tell me its true"

Is this phrase more likely about Noah's Ark or AGW?
 
Back
Top