Climate and Weather

xav10 said:
I swear I don’t listen to him at all. His blurbs pop up everywhere so I see about 3 minutes a month. If libs listen to him, I’m not aware...except maybe lefty websites that like to wind people up. For example, the right spends more time on Saul Alinsky the last 10 years than the left has spent in 50!
Click to expand...
So if you don't listen to him then how do you know what he talks about? I was not an HRC fan nor an Obama fan but I did listen to them. That's how I decided that I couldn't support them. If I were to just listen to sound bites, other peoples opinions or the internet then I'm not making an informed decision.
 
Multi Sport said:
So if you don't listen to him then how do you know what he talks about? I was not an HRC fan nor an Obama fan but I did listen to them. That's how I decided that I couldn't support them. If I were to just listen to sound bites, other peoples opinions or the internet then I'm not making an informed decision.
Click to expand...
You are comparing a wealthy radio huckster to a president, for obtaining viewpoints? Impressive analogy.
It's impossible not to bump into Limbaugh or Levin or O'Reilly (who I actually did watch, from time-to-time) or Christian radio if you're paying attention. The themes are clear. I do not pretend to know where Limbaugh is, or isn't, in line with Trump on any issues, though. I watched Beck change to a different kind of nutjob, but I don't know many specifics. It's all poison, but it sells big-time and they get rich.
As Ted Koppel said to Hannity, it's "bad for the country."
 
xav10 said:
You are comparing a wealthy radio huckster to a president, for obtaining viewpoints? Impressive analogy.
It's impossible not to bump into Limbaugh or Levin or O'Reilly (who I actually did watch, from time-to-time) or Christian radio if you're paying attention. The themes are clear. I do not pretend to know where Limbaugh is, or isn't, in line with Trump on any issues, though. I watched Beck change to a different kind of nutjob, but I don't know many specifics. It's all poison, but it sells big-time and they get rich.
As Ted Koppel said to Hannity, it's "bad for the country."
Click to expand...
Really? Comparing Rush to HRC is a great analogy. Yea, I agree. HRC was pure poison...
 
candy-store-5-1280x720.jpg
 
Sheriff Joe said:
Delingpole: Scott Pruitt Is a Hero, Unlike Some of His EPA Predecessors
13 hours ago
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...NDAB&usg=AOvVaw2uIchYT1f-CruEqJnoPSZY&ampcf=1
Click to expand...
There is a history and many proven reasons behind the regulations and work of the EPA that were meant for the better good of all. Pruitt, doing the bidding of Trump is undermining those things for the good of a few.

. . . of course nutters, Pruitt and Trump included, don't do or know history and will make the same mistakes that were made and then fixed decades ago.

Maybe Trump's motto should be, "To the Detriment of the many for the Profit of the Few!"
 
Hüsker Dü said:
There is a history and many proven reasons behind the regulations and work of the EPA that were meant for the better good of all. Pruitt, doing the bidding of Trump is undermining those things for the good of a few.

. . . of course nutters, Pruitt and Trump included, don't do or know history and will make the same mistakes that were made and then fixed decades ago.

Maybe Trump's motto should be, "To the Detriment of the many for the Profit of the Few!"
Click to expand...


Cite the mistakes being made by Scott Pruitt with the EPA as per your diatribe.....!

Otherwise you are just the A Typical Liberal Blowhard as usual.
 
Pruitt and t had a tough time getting Congress to agree to cut the EPA budget, so P is effectively do the same thing by spending the agency's money on other things, like his security detail.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
I love how you sit there like a small dumb child wanting everything spelled out for you letter by letter . . . then attempt to portray yourself as actually 'in the know'.
Click to expand...
What I do know is that a 97% consensus says that the EPA has done a fine job and Pruitt can save the tax payer some money by reducing the number of EPA employees, once necessary, to gain the 97% consensus.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top