Scientists understand.So simple, scientists don;t understand wtf you're talking about. You must be a Nobel Prize-winning plumber!
A scientist took the photograph and had the stump radiocarbon dated.
Im just a humble plumber spreading the good news.
Scientists understand.So simple, scientists don;t understand wtf you're talking about. You must be a Nobel Prize-winning plumber!
Baby steps, but I think you may be learning to walk.
The region where the old stump stands was warmer 5000 years ago than it is today.
Simple.
That's an assertion. How do you prove it?
Scientists understand.
A scientist took the photograph and had the stump radiocarbon dated.
Im just a humble plumber spreading the good news.
The tree proves it.That's an assertion. How do you prove it?
Yes.Did the scientist in question make the conclusion you have posted?
The tree stump, the tree rings, and the radiocarbon date are proof.In general, he's not concerned with things like actual proof.
Any moron can tell the photo taken by a scientist is obviously photo shopped...pinhead.In general, he's not concerned with things like actual proof.
In general, he's not concerned with things like actual proof.
Yes.
The tree stump, the tree rings, and the radiocarbon date are proof.
Not conjecture using an unproven theory.
Tangible, solid, evidence.
Yes.
The page I posted.On what page in Lamb's book did he make that conclusion?
Read the book.On what page in Lamb's book did he make that conclusion?
Notice he didn't expose the source, perhaps because he has been embarrassed in the past when additional information about his sources was revealed.
The page I posted.
Nah, he doesn't get embarrassed, he just says he was trolling the whole time. It's the game that's played in here. Nutters are impervious to fact checking.
Read the book.
Open your mind.
Reminds me of your Snopes and FEE article adventure and your love affair with Nye.Nah, he doesn't get embarrassed, he just says he was trolling the whole time. It's the game that's played in here. Nutters are impervious to fact checking.
You mean because of her 97% approval rating?One thing we can say for certain about Hubert Lamb - at least he's not Hillary.
Reminds me of your Snopes and FEE article adventure and your love affair with Nye.