4theloveofsoccer
BRONZE
I pay 10 at silver lake soccer complex and I grab 2 sodas an a bag of chips end up paying $8.50 thats ridiculous
@Monkey and @espola, the agreement is here:
http://www.ci.oceanside.ca.us/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=46599
The basic terms of the Lease Agreement with SC Sports (page 33 of above link) are a 25 year lease with 2 10 year options (2.01) ; pays 10% of gross percentage rent after $1.4M threshold (Section 3.02). Parking is prohibited on surrounding public streets during use (Section 1.09).
The relevance of the $1.4M number is that represents the negotiated "break even" point. Until SoCal Sports has $1.4M in gross revenue, it doesn't pay rent. My estimate above was $78k + $50k = $128k x12 = $1.5M, which is fairly close to the $1.4M number. Hmmm, I must know something after all.
Then bring your own soda and chips or better yet forgo the junk food.I pay 10 at silver lake soccer complex and I grab 2 sodas an a bag of chips end up paying $8.50 thats ridiculous
espola's pet gripe surfaces again. I can just picture him, shuffling a quarter mile from the train stop, Birkenstocks lightly slapping the pavement, walking stick in hand. Combing the parking lot for a discarded parking pass to post on the forums with which he's obsessed. "Two dollars," he mutters to himself, shaking his head and picking the remnants of his tuna fish lunch off of his stained Poway HS T-Shirt.
As demonstrated in this thread, these fields are expensive to maintain. I have it on good authority that Silverlakes loses hundreds of thousands of dollars a year and would have closed if not for the billionaire propping it up. I doubt these other facilities are much better off. If my choices are playing on mostly dirt in 30 mph winds in Lancaster, or shuffling from middle school to middle school in a tournament, I'm paying the $12 for well-maintained fields all in one spot and I'm thankful for the opportunity.
But he has it "on good authority" so he must be right?Your information regarding the P&L of Silverlakes and the owner are incorrect
espola's pet gripe surfaces again. I can just picture him, shuffling a quarter mile from the train stop, Birkenstocks lightly slapping the pavement, walking stick in hand. Combing the parking lot for a discarded parking pass to post on the forums with which he's obsessed. "Two dollars," he mutters to himself, shaking his head and picking the remnants of his tuna fish lunch off of his stained Poway HS T-Shirt.
As demonstrated in this thread, these fields are expensive to maintain. I have it on good authority that Silverlakes loses hundreds of thousands of dollars a year and would have closed if not for the billionaire propping it up. I doubt these other facilities are much better off. If my choices are playing on mostly dirt in 30 mph winds in Lancaster, or shuffling from middle school to middle school in a tournament, I'm paying the $12 for well-maintained fields all in one spot and I'm thankful for the opportunity.
Your information regarding the P&L of Silverlakes and the owner are incorrect
Your information regarding the P&L of Silverlakes and the owner are incorrect
I'm shocked that your definitive denial was not immediately followed by any sort of evidence.
Balboa pays $80k+ per month to Norco for lease and debt repayments. That's before paying one dollar of actual expenses. I'm inclined to believe my source.
If we are done early I will drive out holding my parking pass outside my window. Usually someone driving in will see me doing this and slow down to grab my ticket.It’s just going to keep going up because they can. Pretty soon we will be paying $20 a day. Atleast Silverlakes has something to show for our parking $$ but surf and Oceanside have nothing
It’s just going to keep going up because they can. Pretty soon we will be paying $20 a day. Atleast Silverlakes has something to show for our parking $$ but surf and Oceanside have nothing
Damn, did I forget to reference any evidence. My bad. My evidence is "good authority" Hell, if it's good enough for you, then it must be good enough for me....idiot.
The city of Norco does not receive $80k a month from BMG and that number is way off the mark. Revenues and profits have exceeded all expectations since opening day. BMG's own proformas project a net positive cash flow of 3.5 million in 2018. Expect them to continue to reinvest and adding more amenities which will further increase revenues.
Source or no source, you have no f'ing idea what you are talking about. These large venues are ALL cash flow positive and extremely lucrative businesses.
By the way, RB is long f'ing way from being a billionaire and the fact that you made that silly a** statement tells me that you don't know who he is and that you have no idea of any of the partners networths.
From Dec. 1, 2017 story at http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com...no-elcorazon-construction-20171201-story.html:
The Oceanside Planning Commission approved basic design plans last year for an Olympic-sized competition pool, an instructional pool, a children’s water-play area and other facilities.
The city has about half of the $14 million to $16 million it needs to build the aquatics center, which would have the city’s first new swimming pools in more than 50 years. However, earlier this year the City Council voted against issuing bonds for the remainder of the construction money, along with funding for other projects, because of questions about how to cover the annual $1 million in maintenance costs.
A new proposal for funding the aquatics center will be presented as part of next year’s capital improvement budget, Weiss said.