Essential Economics for Politicians

Why do you defend Hillary is the face of actual proof?
Proof of what? She negligently used her personal server for business purposes? BFD. What else? Nobody has been investigated more, ever. Did she whine like a bitch about their bias to delegitimization the Benghazi investigation and the email investigation? Did she rant and rave about comey when he possibly cost her the election by saying “re-opening the investigation?” Guilty of what?
 
Proof of what? She negligently used her personal server for business purposes? BFD. What else? Nobody has been investigated more, ever. Did she whine like a bitch about their bias to delegitimization the Benghazi investigation and the email investigation? Did she rant and rave about comey when he possibly cost her the election by saying “re-opening the investigation?” Guilty of what?
And you talk about us? You are officially a kook.
 
Proof of what? She negligently used her personal server for business purposes? BFD. What else? Nobody has been investigated more, ever. Did she whine like a bitch about their bias to delegitimization the Benghazi investigation and the email investigation? Did she rant and rave about comey when he possibly cost her the election by saying “re-opening the investigation?” Guilty of what?
You are trying to talk sense to a political tool? Someone who has chosen Trump over country.
 
He has condoned violence toward political opponents at rallies, suggesting he wants violent support from a mob. He denounces the press as the enemy and suggests pulling their licenses, which would tend to leave “his” media (ie fox, etc) unopposed. He continues to have rallies even though he’s already president. He denounces judges as “Mexican” and, therefore, “biased,” when they are ruling in his case. He denounces the Department of Justice and the FBI as “biased” and “corrupt” while investigating him. The latter two are examples of attempting to delegitimization government forces that are independent of his power. He wants a military parade. Nepotism is a hallmark if his administration. He lies every day, more than any president in history, and denies that he lied. These are all hallmarks of one who seeks to rule without any opposition, ie a dictator.
Again, dictators don't let people keep more of the wages that they earned. Dictators don't let corporations keep more of the money that they earned. Dictators don't want to penalize people for not buying health insurance. Dictators don't tell people they can keep their healhtcare if they like it and then reduce the options for healthcare, while prices increase. None of what you stated actually dictate$ anything.
 
He has condoned violence toward political opponents at rallies, suggesting he wants violent support from a mob. He denounces the press as the enemy and suggests pulling their licenses, which would tend to leave “his” media (ie fox, etc) unopposed. He continues to have rallies even though he’s already president. He denounces judges as “Mexican” and, therefore, “biased,” when they are ruling in his case. He denounces the Department of Justice and the FBI as “biased” and “corrupt” while investigating him. The latter two are examples of attempting to delegitimization government forces that are independent of his power. He wants a military
parade. Nepotism is a hallmark if his administration. He lies every day, more than any president in history, and denies that he lied. These are all hallmarks of one who seeks to rule without any opposition, ie a dictator.


Did the above happen? Yep. Is your interpretation of what happened far reaching? I think so. Now if President Trump were to run again, lose and then declare the election void and claim victory and at the same time try to change the laws so that he can stay in power indefinitely... well I would be in total agreement with you.
 
Again with the gullible stupidity? When have any of these people you listen to ever been correct? Idiocracy is truly upon us.
 
Back
Top