LB State played a hell of a game in Provo last night. They gave up a late game winner, but went toe to toe most of the game.
Not easy to do in Provo.
Not easy to do in Provo.
She creates her share. That team has plenty of offensive firepower to go around.I like Gomes she creates most of that teams opportunities.
Cali you should put down the crack pipe. If you really want to compare NC State and UCLA we can starting with the weak players that NC State has and that they recruit.
.You are so far gone that it is ridiculous. I am going to hammer you on the Sheep Pack all season now.
Their "star" freshmen played for Maryland United and CASL last year idiot. Nice try. You are getting more and more silly.
I love Sundays...
I get it..."that they recruit." That's a jab at my kid. Does that make you feel good, saying that she is weak? And uh, did those weak players beat UNC, who just happened to beat UCLA? If NC State players (and those that they recruit) are weak, what does that say about the Bruin players? You said it, not me.
"Sheep Pack", that's rich. I get it...because they are known as the Wolfpack. Man, you are so clever. Ha, Ha, Ha...oh, BTW, they just added another ACC victory this afternoon, beating Wake Forest 2-1 in come from behind fashion.
Uh, instead of calling me names, maybe you should learn more about the roster before acting like you know everything about everything. Guess what, their leading freshman scorer is not from Maryland United...she is from Fredricksburg FC, a non-ECNL club in Virginia. The leading freshman playmaker with the team lead in assists is also not from Maryland United. She is from Bayern Munich, another non-ECNL club in Germany. The Maryland United player you're referring to is a freshman. You at least got that much right. She is one of the contributors to their success, but she is also the first one to say that she is not the star of the team.
They have played a successful non-conference schedule, and they have gone 2-1 in ACC Conference play so far. Chafes your hide, don't it? Don't worry, they will have more losses this season...after all, it is the ACC. The toughest women's soccer conference in all the land. You'll have more opportunities to respond and retort to try to make me feel bad, but guess what....I am already thrilled of their performance, even if they lose out.![]()
Okay here is the next salvo. Congratulations on the win! We will see how the season turns out. Regarding recruiting it was not a shot at your kid but you said it not me. Regarding recruiting and UCLA there really is no need for me to compare recruits, results, academics, campus life anything because quite honestly there is a big difference between the two (chess vs checkers) so let's continue. I checked them out and they aren't very good. I can only imagine that they got extremely lucky against UNC and Wake Forest sucks so wins against crap teams don't impress me at all.
NC State is a bottom feeder in the top conference in the country. We will see if they are even the top conference by the time your little Mia gets there. Then we will see how much she plays and how soon she decides to "Pack" it up and transfer back home. Legends isn't known for producing a bunch of next level impact players. Outside of the African American holding mid and the African American forward on your daughter's team I don't see a whole lot of impact talent on that team. Honestly you are in for a big surprise in 2018. I wish I could be there to see the look on your face once you get that September phone call..
Whatcha got for me now Cali?
Ok, I'm a general noob to women's NCAA soccer. Other than knowing who the usually dominant schools are, I am clueless as to the playing styles each school/coach may be known for. Some specific questions: I want to know which schools are known for playing out of the back and utilizing keepers with great feet (as opposed to just putting a female version of Rob Gronkowski in the cage). Teams that play possession and control, finesse, more like the Japanese WNT? Also, which ones are more known for direct and counter attacking? Which ones mainly rely on getting the genetic freaks and just physically steamrolling everyone? I am not interested in debating the merits of these styles (there's enough of that elsewhere), just want a primer on the tactical differences of the top programs. Bernie, MAP, Cali? Espola? Anyone else?
Let's just say very very very FEW college teams play any sort of possession soccer. I would also throw in the University of Portland in the mix of a school's that play possession soccer. They just aren't able to recruit the elite players they once did under the late Clive Charles back in the early 2000s.Agree with MAP about Long Beach State and others...they emphasis a possession-oriented style of play. I don't have alot of exposure to women's college soccer, but we did watch ALOT of matches last season. From what I saw, many schools in the Big 10 and SEC are geared toward a very direct style of play that doesn't use the midfield very much. ASU and Oregon are trying to become possession heavy, but tend to fall back on long ball when they feel pressured. The elite programs (UNC, Stanford, Florida State, UCLA, Virginia, Duke) have players with the body composition for muscle ball, but they also have skill and speed to play whatever way they want.
Some coaches take the talent they have and tailor a playing system that utilizes that talent best. Some coaches will have a "style" and recruit players who fit that style. Other coaches have a "system", and take the best, or most athletic players they can get and fit them into that system.Ok, I'm a general noob to women's NCAA soccer. Other than knowing who the usually dominant schools are, I am clueless as to the playing styles each school/coach may be known for. Some specific questions: I want to know which schools are known for playing out of the back and utilizing keepers with great feet (as opposed to just putting a female version of Rob Gronkowski in the cage). Teams that play possession and control, finesse, more like the Japanese WNT? Also, which ones are more known for direct and counter attacking? Which ones mainly rely on getting the genetic freaks and just physically steamrolling everyone? I am not interested in debating the merits of these styles (there's enough of that elsewhere), just want a primer on the tactical differences of the top programs. Bernie, MAP, Cali? Espola? Anyone else?
I could have swore you posted the question I responded to under another name yesterday.Good info. Thanks. I want my kid to watch some games to understand the college game better and recognize the type of players in her position that make it in different styles, and figure out on her own what she should work on if she is to be successful at the college level. We could even go see Long Beach in person, so that's a plus.
Bernie - Great point on coaching changes. I've heard numerous stories of players who had bad experiences with coaching changes midway through their college careers.
Get the M8 box. Includes all the Pac 12 channelsI got all excited to log on and watch USC play Oregon online.... and then realized you have to have the channel in your cable package.
How do you all watch the games?
Or maybe 3 of them.Get the M8 box. Includes all the Pac 12 channels
Santa Clara ties BYU in Provo 0-0 in the first West Coast match of the year.I got all excited to log on and watch USC play Oregon online.... and then realized you have to have the channel in your cable package.
How do you all watch the games?