Ponderable

It is hilarious to witness how obtuse and narrow-minded you and those who agree with you are.

my·op·ic
adjective
nearsighted.
synonyms: nearsighted; shortsighted

lacking imagination, foresight, or intellectual insight.
Irony alert
 
He violated the Constitution and Bill of Rights. When a judge ordered him to stop, he persisted. Except for the action of the criminals presently occupying the White house, he would be in federal prison.
Wez, here is another lie from E-reader.
It seems your and your commie friends opinions don't really matter, especially when the most important and most powerful man in the world doesn't agree.
 
Acceptable to whom?
I don't know how many times "Clinton lied about sex, who cares?" was posted in the kitchen.
Look at his impeachment regarding perjury & obstruction of justice (part of why he was found in contempt of court).
Not one Democrat found him guilty of these charges. Apparently finding his behavior acceptable....
The women who accused WJC of sexual assault were attacked and/or ignored.
It's no wonder jackasses like Weinstein are able to do what they have done for decades.
 
WRONG. Clinton was civil contempt, Arpaio was criminal contempt. Big difference as you know.

Really?

Judge Finds Clinton in Contempt of Court
By Roberto Suro and Joan Biskupic
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, April 13, 1999; Page A1

A federal judge yesterday held President Clinton in contempt of court for giving "intentionally false" testimony about his relationship with Monica S. Lewinsky in the Paula Jones lawsuit, marking the first time that a sitting president has been sanctioned for disobeying a court order.

In a biting, 32-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright of Arkansas said Clinton gave "false, misleading and evasive answers that were designed to obstruct the judicial process" in Jones's sexual harassment lawsuit. She specifically cited Clinton's assertions that he was never alone with Lewinsky and that he did not have a sexual relationship with the former White House intern.

Wright, who personally presided over Clinton's January 1998 deposition in the Jones case, acknowledged that no court had ever taken such action against a president but said it was important to act to "protect the integrity" of the judicial process.

"Sanctions must be imposed, not only to redress the president's misconduct, but to deter others who might themselves consider emulating the president of the United States by engaging in misconduct that undermines the integrity of the judicial system," she wrote.

Wright had the option to order more severe penalties under her civil contempt authority and had the power to summarily find Clinton guilty of criminal contempt.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/contempt041399.htm
 
Back
Top