What were you referring to here?
Ponderable
- Thread starter Bruddah IZ
- Start date
I love that quote.
Do you mean like when I asked "What makes you think that?" and you responded with fascist propaganda?
You deny antifa are marxist.
I get it.
Its a tough thing for some to admit.
Why I set up this little hookilau.
Thanks for the confirmation, espolifa.
I didn't deny or confirm they are marxist. I asked for the background of why you called them marxist. You responded with fascist propaganda.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Itʻs the progressive way.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Bruddah IZ
DA
Looks like youʻre spooling multiple lines.
Hüsker Dü
DA
The language you use, the wording is very similar to that of my co-worker as he is an apologist for and an active member of white supremacist groups.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Bruddah IZ
DA
Quaaaaaaaaack!
Hüsker Dü
DA
The cloaked nature of the modern day recruitment program teaches deniability and leaving an out to normalize the message.
Hüsker Dü
DA
You may find it humorous but you are being naive.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Irony Alert
Bruddah IZ
DA
And again.
Why would you work with a nazi?
Our Democrat leaders just can't take enough...
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sacramento sets its eye on taxing our drinking water
Sacramento is setting its eyes on the latest resource it can tax in California — drinking water.
For the first time in California’s history, lawmakers are proposing a 95-cent per month tax on your water bill. Senate Bill 623 would establish a new water connection tax, fertilizer tax and milk tax to raise about $200 million for a new “Safe and Affordable Water” fund.
While we all can all agree that all Californians should have access to safe and clean drinking water, there are ample general fund resources and many federal grants available to pay for those costs. The answer is to this problem is not imposing a new $200 million annual water tax.
Supporters of SB623 will argue that this legislation will help those who are poor, disadvantaged, and reside in rural areas. It does not. If you are a private groundwater well owner, you will not be eligible under this bill to apply for state or federal funding to address any contaminants in your water. Adding a tax on drinking water will only make clean and safe water less affordable for all Californians.
According to the California Tax Foundation, since the beginning of this year Sacramento lawmakers have introduced more than 90 bills that would cost taxpayers more than $370 billion annually in higher taxes and fees. Now these lawmakers want to add another tax but this time on your drinking water. Will there be anything that is not taxed in California?
http://www.ocregister.com/2017/08/31/sacramento-sets-its-eye-on-taxing-our-drinking-water/
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sacramento sets its eye on taxing our drinking water
Sacramento is setting its eyes on the latest resource it can tax in California — drinking water.
For the first time in California’s history, lawmakers are proposing a 95-cent per month tax on your water bill. Senate Bill 623 would establish a new water connection tax, fertilizer tax and milk tax to raise about $200 million for a new “Safe and Affordable Water” fund.
While we all can all agree that all Californians should have access to safe and clean drinking water, there are ample general fund resources and many federal grants available to pay for those costs. The answer is to this problem is not imposing a new $200 million annual water tax.
Supporters of SB623 will argue that this legislation will help those who are poor, disadvantaged, and reside in rural areas. It does not. If you are a private groundwater well owner, you will not be eligible under this bill to apply for state or federal funding to address any contaminants in your water. Adding a tax on drinking water will only make clean and safe water less affordable for all Californians.
According to the California Tax Foundation, since the beginning of this year Sacramento lawmakers have introduced more than 90 bills that would cost taxpayers more than $370 billion annually in higher taxes and fees. Now these lawmakers want to add another tax but this time on your drinking water. Will there be anything that is not taxed in California?
http://www.ocregister.com/2017/08/31/sacramento-sets-its-eye-on-taxing-our-drinking-water/
Bruddah IZ
DA
Hüsker Dü
DA
He's actually a foreman now, smart guy, hard worker, very amiable (unless you cut him off surfing then give him lip, apparently), you really can't pick who you work with all the time. Actually I like him and am trying to get him away from the aryan nation BS he learned in the pen . . . he has a kid now and that has mellowed him a bit. But still he thinks a pure white nation isn't an unreasonable idea and questions things like why there is a need for a Black Congressional Caucus or Affirmative Action.