2017-2018 D1 Women's Soccer Talk!

Kicknit22 said:
I'm going on record by saying UCLA will NOT lose a single game. Has anyone ever done that? Could this be a historic year?
Click to expand...
UNC 1981, 1991, 1992, 1993, 2003 won all games; no ties. UCLA looked good at home the other night against a young Santa Clara team, but they showed some flaws. The cross town rivalry battle will be epic this year. Plus UCLA goes on the road to UVA and Boulder next month. I doubt a run of the table will happened, but they are talented enough to do it.
 
goldentoe said:
UNC 1981, 1991, 1992, 1993, 2003 won all games; no ties. UCLA looked good at home the other night against a young Santa Clara team, but they showed some flaws. The cross town rivalry battle will be epic this year. Plus UCLA goes on the road to UVA and Boulder next month. I doubt a run of the table will happened, but they are talented enough to do it.
Click to expand...

I am not concerned at any time they could lock down any team. With their center for at center back along with you know who nobody is getting by them! And I don't really care Because people are going to say what they want to say and I saw the alleged top four teams in the country lose over the course of the last two days. Not to mention that Penn State struggles against a terrible Arkansas team. I will take a school record for goals in the first three games good luck to you and your daughter.
 
Out of the mouths of babes... I have nothing more to say on this topic. I will let the video and the box scores do all the talking.
 
MakeAPlay said:
Out of the mouths of babes... I have nothing more to say on this topic. I will let the video and the box scores do all the talking.
Click to expand...
images
 
MakeAPlay said:
Keep looking for flaws. They have the best defender in the conference and it was on display. Don't worry you have until November to figure out what you are going to do. Can't wait to see you lose on the road this weekend to Mizzou. The truth hurts? I saw a team fricasse another and the game wasn't as close as the score. Keep focusing on the Bruins. Not one Trojan would start for them. For your sake they clean it up because that team that played UC Davis is 4-5 goals worse than UCLA and isn't a tournament team. Keep it coming. Let's see what you say when they put 20 goals up in 4 games and by the time conference rolls around they match your Trojans season total.

UCLA will get the superfecta this year:

Embarrass $C worse this time
PAC 12 title
PAC 12 offensive POY
PAC 12 defensive POY
PAC 12 freshman of the year
PAC 12 coach of the year
National title #114

You have no idea.... Keep on hating!! I'm going to screenshot your post for my player and one of her roommates. You can tell yours that it will be more than one nutmeg this year.
Click to expand...
This looks like a parlay card to me.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
Is this bad?
She has a womanly figure, which in my eyes is beautiful.
I meant it as a compliment, after all, she is a woman.

Am I out of line?
Click to expand...
@Ricky Fandango id say out of line because there's no such thing as one womanly figure. I believe we have to be careful generalizing what a woman , especially a female athlete "should look like". I agree with you that Sidney is gorgeous! in my opinion she doesn't have any hips and the baby cut her boobs in half. Does that mean she's not womanly anymore? yael averbusch (I'm sorry I think I spelled her name wrong) is tall and slender naturally, does that make her not womanly?

It's tough enough that our girls worry about getting too muscular because that looks "like a boy". Look at how people treat Serena williams who is pretty and strong.

A "womanly" shape is whatever shape any woman happens to be. Skinny, voluptuous, tall, short, big boob small boob.

And yes it matters what we say because our daughters take it to heart
 
pooka said:
@Ricky Fandango id say out of line because there's no such thing as one womanly figure. I believe we have to be careful generalizing what a woman , especially a female athlete "should look like". I agree with you that Sidney is gorgeous! in my opinion she doesn't have any hips and the baby cut her boobs in half. Does that mean she's not womanly anymore? yael averbusch (I'm sorry I think I spelled her name wrong) is tall and slender naturally, does that make her not womanly?

It's tough enough that our girls worry about getting too muscular because that looks "like a boy". Look at how people treat Serena williams who is pretty and strong.

A "womanly" shape is whatever shape any woman happens to be. Skinny, voluptuous, tall, short, big boob small boob.

And yes it matters what we say because our daughters take it to heart
Click to expand...
I didnt say anyone "should" look like anything.
I just said that I like the fact that she's a great athlete with a womanly figure.
I like that.
You dont have to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top