The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Texas Democratic Party Leader Funded ‘Voter Fraud Ring,’ Says AG
EmailGoogle+Twitter

Leticia-Sanchez-1-640x480.jpg

Leticia Sanchez
25 Oct 20183,302

4:43
A North Texas woman recently indicted as part of a “voter fraud ring” paid the others involved in the scheme with funds provided by a Democratic Party leader, say court documents filed by the Office of Attorney General Ken Paxton this week.
Leticia Sanchez was charged with 17 felony counts of voter fraud following an investigation by Paxton’s office. Sanchez, 57, allegedly paid her co-defendants to target elderly voters in select northern Fort Worth precincts in the 2016 March Democrat Party primary election to affect the outcome of certain down-ballot candidate races.



The state’s newly filed notice of intent to introduce evidence in the Sanchez criminal case alleged that Stuart Clegg, then Tarrant County Democratic Party executive director, funded the alleged voter fraud ring’s criminal activities.



Breitbart obtained the court documents which stated that “after learning that state police investigators were in Tarrant County interviewing voters and members of her vote harvesting group,” Sanchez sent a text message to her daughter, Leticia Sanchez Tepichin, “conveying a message from Sanchez and Stuart Clegg” that the others involved in the ring should not cooperate with investigators. The message, written in Spanish, told Tepichin to “advise immediately” that a group of “malicious people” were investigating “our work” and “our boss Mr. Stuart.” She also advised them that a lawyer was in charge of the matter and they should tell the lawyer immediately if they are approached by anyone with questions.


Tarrant County/Leticia Sanchez Tepichin

Previously, Breitbart reported the AG’s Election Fraud Unit said the women carried out their the ruse by “seeding” or proliferating mail ballots to the targeted precincts through forged signatures, altering historical applications, and resubmitting them without the voter’s knowledge.


Sanchez was one of four women indicted on a cumulative 30 counts of voter fraud. Tepichin, 39, was indicted on nine counts of voter fraud; Maria Rosa Solis, 40, was charged on two counts for forging signatures on the mail-in ballots; and Laura Parra, 24, received one count of forgery.



The state’s notice also stated that Sanchez faxed the fraudulently obtained applications for mail-in ballots using the fax machine of then Fort Worth City Councilman Sal Espino. The court document did not name Espino of any wrongdoing in connection with the case.

The court documents then said that Sanchez and her cohorts collaborated on the voter fraud scheme between January 2015 and March 2016, intending to affect the outcome of the 2016 March Democratic Primary election in the unidentified down-ballot races.

Despite these serious voter fraud charges, Greg Westfall, one of two attorneys for Tepichin, insisted the state’s case was politically motivated and sought to suppress minority voting, according to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.


“They are being used by people who want to justify voter ID,” said Westfall. “At the end of the day, there’s not going to be any fraud in this deal.”

The other lawyer Frank Sellers described the four women as “intelligent, educated women” who are church goers that have “never been in trouble a day in their lives,” work “multiple jobs to support their families” and are “good, helpful people.”

Still, one alleged victim, 76-year-old Minnie Barela, a blind Fort Worth woman, said otherwise when she told the Star-Telegram that Sanchez turned up at her door “very friendly,” indicating she had the “authority” to help Barela with her mail-in ballot. Barela said she did not suspect anything wrong initially until Barela said she disagreed with Sanchez, who allegedly marked Barela’s ballot without her consent.
 
Just another criminal left wing kook,
FL-Gov: Democratic candidate Andrew Gillum says if police have drawn weapons, they’ve gone ‘too far’
1 hour
gettyimages-1052757994-1280x720.jpg

Florida gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum says that anytime a police officer pulls out a weapon, they have gone "too far." (Joe Raedle/Getty Images
 
Roberts Will Have Hand on Throttle as Supreme Court Veers Right
Oct 29 2018, 8:00 AMOct 29 2018, 5:26 PMOctober 29 2018, 8:00 AMOctober 29 2018, 5:26 PM


(Bloomberg) -- A shift to to the right is a near certainty for the U.S. Supreme Court. How quickly it will happen is up to Chief Justice John Roberts.

With Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation, Roberts is now in firm control of the court’s throttle, positioned to decide whether and when to overturn liberal precedents.

560x-1.jpg

The stakes could hardly be higher. The court is being called on -- or will be soon -- to rule on abortion, guns, gay rights, religious freedom, campaign finance, voting rights, government regulation and presidential power.

In each area, conservative legal advocates have blazed a clear path they want the court to take. And in each, Roberts seems at least pointed in that direction.

But Roberts, 63, has also made himself the chief guardian of the court’s institutional standing, one who worries about any perception of it as a partisan body. That’s an image that would be hard to dispel if the court started issuing sweeping decisions with the five Republican appointees in the majority and the four Democratic appointees in dissent.

"His record shows a consistently conservative view of the law," said Allison Orr Larsen, a constitutional law professor teaching at Harvard Law School this semester. At the same time, he "seems to care very much about the court as an institution, and he is particularly aware of the fragility of the court when all eyes are watching and people view the justices as just politicians in robes."

Roberts and the court return to the bench Monday when they hear arguments in a pair of cases involving the enforcement of arbitration agreements.

Clerk to Rehnquist
Roberts, a 2005 appointee of President George W. Bush, joined the court with an impeccably conservative resume. He worked as a law clerk to then-Justice William Rehnquist, in President Ronald Reagan’s Justice Department and White House, and as deputy to Solicitor General Ken Starr in President George H.W. Bush’s administration.

Roberts has been on the conservative side of almost every 5-4 ideological divide since he became chief justice in 2005, the most glaring exception being his 2012 decision to join the liberal wing in upholding President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act.

He has also helped ensure the court’s rightward shift occurs incrementally. When the court considered throwing out a core part of the Voting Rights Act in 2009 as unconstitutional, Roberts instead wrote a narrow opinion that first gave Congress a chance to fix the law. After Congress didn’t act, he wrote a landmark 2013 decision that tossed out the disputed provision.

Similarly, Roberts wrote a 2007 opinion that gave companies, labor unions and interest groups more power to run political ads but didn’t go as far as three conservative colleagues wanted. Three years later, Roberts went the next step, joining that group and a fifth justice in the sweeping Citizens United decision.

Moving Gradually
Moving gradually is "in the chief justice’s DNA," Washington appellate lawyer Kannon Shanmugam of Williams & Connolly said last month. Roberts has "demonstrated in his time on the court a real reluctance both to overrule the court’s prior precedents and to move quickly."

But in some areas, Roberts doesn’t seem interested in waiting. He made his opposition to affirmation action clear when he wrote in a 2007 school integration case that "the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race."

And in others, his more conservative colleagues could try to push him. Although it takes five justices to issue a majority decision, only four are needed to agree to hear an appeal. For example, four other justices could vote to hear an appeal that challenges the Roe v. Wade abortion-rights ruling, hoping that Roberts will join them after the case is argued.

In his only public appearance since the rancorous fight that preceded Kavanaugh’s Oct. 6 confirmation, Roberts touted the importance of a nonpartisan judiciary. Speaking at the University of Minnesota Law School, Roberts made his point by paraphrasing comments from Kavanaugh at his confirmation hearing.

"As our newest colleague put it, we do not sit on opposite sides of an aisle," Roberts said. "We do not caucus in separate rooms. We do not serve one party or one interest. We serve one nation."

Battle Over Kavanaugh
The remarks glossed over the deeply partisan battle over the nomination, including Kavanaugh’s angry insistence that sexual assault allegations against him stemmed from a "calculated and orchestrated political hit."

So far Roberts and his colleagues have managed to muffle any partisan divisions. The court averted a sharp split this week when it shielded Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross from being questioned under oath about his plan to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. None the liberal justices publicly dissented, perhaps because the court let other aspects of the lawsuits challenging the plan go forward.

The harmony won’t last forever. By next June, the court could be ruling on brewing fights over partisan gerrymandering, the workplace rights of gay and transgender people and Trump’s effort to rescind deportation protections for young undocumented immigrants.

Kavanaugh’s confirmation means conservatives will probably have the upper hand in each of those cases. And in all likelihood it will be Roberts who decides how far the court goes.

©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
 
Fox News asshole behavior got to be too much for solid right-winger Matt Drudge today ass he criticized the FN on-air team making jokes about the Pittsburgh synagogue slaughter. He tweeted "A segment on Fox News this morning where hosts laughed and joked their way through a discussion on political impact of terror was bizarre. Not even 48 hours since blood flowed at synagogue? Check your soul in the makeup chair!"

I may have to find a more reliable t supporter to balance my news coverage from now on.
 
Lawsuit: Trump misled investors in money-losing companyby The Associated Press, AP22 minutes ago
NEW YORK --

President Donald Trump is accused in a lawsuit of misleading investors who lost money in a multi-level marketing company he endorsed in speeches and on "The Celebrity Apprentice."

The suit filed Monday in Manhattan federal court alleges the president received millions of dollars in exchange for reassuring investors in telephone company ACN there was little risk if they paid fees and incurred other expenses to start selling its phone service to others. The suit says Trump knew the salespeople had little chance of recouping their money and falsely claimed he had done extensive due diligence on the company.

The suit filed by four investors says Trump violated federal anti-racketeering law and is seeking class-action status.

The Trump Organization did not immediately respond to phone and email requests for comment.
 
Back
Top