I posted some snap shots out of one in the climate thread.Which ones have you read?
Happy hunting.
I posted some snap shots out of one in the climate thread.Which ones have you read?
"err . . . um, all of them"Which ones have you read?
Truth stings, doesn't it."err . . . um, all of them"
I posted some snap shots out of one in the climate thread.
Happy hunting.
Im looking at one right now.You never gave a satisfactory reason why. You're up.
Yes, yes, and the economic genius has laid out the true path in his economics thread . . . geniuses all of you with nono being the mad scientist, "IT'S ALIVE!" LTFOLI posted some snap shots out of one in the climate thread.
Happy hunting.
Your incarnations of fictitious beings have no bearing on what is in fact, reality.Yes, yes, and the economic genius has laid out the true path in his economics thread . . . geniuses all of you with nono being the mad scientist, "IT'S ALIVE!" LTFOL
Why hasn't the world adopted your philosophy? The fools, letting a mind like yours go to waste! LOL!
Im looking at one right now.
I'll give you a clue.
It has a picture of a tree.
A very old tree.
So is Wikipedia a valid source now? You never gave a satisfactory answer. You're up now.You never gave a satisfactory reason why. You're up.
NASA?So it's all just a fantasy?
Here is some reality --
https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v4/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt
So is Wikipedia a valid source now? You never gave a satisfactory answer. You're up now.
Have not read it, but have seen some youtube applications.The Case for Fossil Fuels by Alex Epstien
Wikipedia is not a valid source.I am satisfied with my multiple answers. Thank you for the opportunity to explore the subject.
Still waiting for the alarmist to stop consuming fossil fuels completely.
The Case for Fossil Fuels by Alex Epstien
Wikipedia is not a valid source.
I have changed wikipedia errors myself.
I did so while researching one of my ancestors.
The changes I made are still there.What was wrong with the article you corrected? Have you gone back to see how your effort was recorded in the history file attached to that article?
It is interesting that you use your experience in correcting errors in Wikipedia as evidence of its invalidity. As I have stated many times, it is a good starting point.
The changes I made are still there.
Had I not changed them, my assumption is that the wiki "facts" would still be wrong.