Ponderable

Yes. It does.

So persons that assert the 5th are "cunts". I'll assume that is regardless of gender.

Interesting. I'm writing "cunt" as Sheriff Joe's opinion, in my notes for those that take the 5th.

I've a hunch taking the 5th is about to be fairly routine as so-called investigations in DC ramp up. Hate for anyone to call you a hypocrite should any of your political allies "take the 5th" and you view them as anything other than being a "cunt".
No, just her.
 
Mean while back in the Golden State:

A top California Democrat is scrapping his re-election campaign and resigning his leadership post amid growing sexual harassment allegations.

California Assembly Majority Whip Raul Bocanegra announced he plans to step down next year -- after a staffer said he put his hands inside her blouse at a nightclub in 2009 and The Los Angeles Times reportedly presented him with harassment allegations from a total of six women.

Bocanegra reportedly announced he would immediately step down from his post as majority whip, citing “persistent rumors and speculation” over sexual harassment claims.

The decision marks the first resignation or retirement in California tied to the wave of harassment allegations that has swept the country and implicated numerous lawmakers and candidates. .....

He added: “I am also suspending my campaign and will not run for re-election.”

The Times reported that it was preparing a story with the accounts of the six women and presented Bocanegra's office with those findings on Friday.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...g-down-amid-new-sexual-harassment-claims.html
 
Wishes are nice...to bad Clinton didn't have that 'kind of integrity'....
It's a whole new, different world now, than it was almost 30 years ago and he isn't in office or running for one. If he runs again bring this back up . . . but for now we have just about every male politician, currently in officer running for, under a microscope as they should be.
 
[QUOTE="Nonononono, post: 139197, member: 2987"

Consult any fake news source like ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSBC, CNBC, BBC, AP, UPI, or even real news Fox for the 20. Some are not named because they were teenagers when he barged into their dressing room during his Miss Whatever pageants, which he was taped confessing to doing. Access Hollywood I think on that one.

LIAR !

The 10 year old is thankfully not publicly named to my knowledge until a nincompoop like Steve Bannon decides to name her, but I saw a widely disseminated video of our self-admitted sexual predator president on an escalator chatting up a pre teen girl he predicted he'd be dating when she got a bit older.

WHAT LIE !

And from my experience working with Examiners of Questioned Documents, the last thing Moore will want to have his bluff called if having the original yearbook compared against contemporaneous documents he wrote back when he was a 32 pedophile banned from local malls.

IT'S A FORGERY AND A LIE !

Please identify all of your education and experience in the field of examination of Questioned Documents to proffer this opinion.

Signature comparisons are not the central point of these examiner's analysis. It's writing samples such as hand written notes. The kind a district attorney writes on yellow legal pads that are meticulously stored in courthouse archives.

A COMPLETE LIE !
Please identify all of your education and experience in the field of examination of Questioned Documents to proffer this opinion.
[/QUOTE]



Dude .....You really are an ASS.

That comment could be taken any number of ways ...

Only a Pervert such as YOU would interpret that as something derogatory.
 
Yes. It does.

So persons that assert the 5th are "cunts". I'll assume that is regardless of gender.

Interesting. I'm writing "cunt" as Sheriff Joe's opinion, in my notes for those that take the 5th.

I've a hunch taking the 5th is about to be fairly routine as so-called investigations in DC ramp up. Hate for anyone to call you a hypocrite should any of your political allies "take the 5th" and you view them as anything other than being a "cunt".

Connect the dots... where was it typed that she's a cunt because she invoked the 5th?
 
It's a whole new, different world now, than it was almost 30 years ago and he isn't in office or running for one. If he runs again bring this back up . . . but for now we have just about every male politician, currently in officer running for, under a microscope as they should be.
You just don't get it...he's a sexual predator, period. He should be in jail asswipe.
 
You just don't get it...he's a sexual predator, period. He should be in jail asswipe.

Start a thread where you can talk all day long about your Clinton hate, that way you'll feel less inclined to constantly bring it up on every thread with every comment.
 
Wishes are nice...to bad Clinton didn't have that 'kind of integrity'....
Clinton should have resigned. No question.

Jail? Not enough there from his time in the Motel with Ms. Broaddrick. She did not open up until 1997 in her sealed "Jane Doe" affidavit and 1999 publically. Well after his second election.
 
My question to you re Lerner was specific to her taking the 5th.

"Do you hold a positive or negative view of her assertion?"

Your clear and concise response was "She's a cunt. Hope that clears it up."

And it does. If you had reason to clarify a distinction you wished to draw between "cunts" in general because of their political alliances, you had that opportunity. You did not do so. The reasonable person would draw the conclusion I did, noting your position in my notes.

Then the first 5th taker from the Trump crowd is cited, to test if you would be consistent in your belief system.

You were not. And one of your sweet talking buddies chirped in his own lovely use of the English language.

Thus I expect you'll call all liberal sides 5th takers "cunts" and all Trump conspirators, abetters and obstruction of justice 5th takers as patriots.

Got it.
 
Dude .....You really are an ASS.

That comment could be taken any number of ways ...

Only a Pervert such as YOU would interpret that as something derogatory.
Man, your "tell" is even more obvious than before. I'm gonna start giving you positive ratings as a wink for each fake nutter rant you come up with. It'll be our little secret.
 
Start a thread where you can talk all day long about your Clinton hate, that way you'll feel less inclined to constantly bring it up on every thread with every comment.
Again I don't hate anyone, not Bill, not you, not even Ratman...
We're talking about sexual predators and how Bill made it cool to be one...
You suffer the same affliction as Rat...you excuse Clinton as if time erases his assaults. They don't.
Apparently your standards apply to only some you disagree with
Bill should be in jail and bunk buddies with Anthony Weiner.
Hillary and Huma could then go visit their hubbies together
 
Projecting is the only thing they are good at.
It's that pretzel thing again.
It's always new for me keeping up with the changing lingo. I take it "projecting" is where you're caught in a compromising situation, and rather than admit and deal with it by apology or contrition, you "project" the conduct on your adversary. Right?

An example, if I may. You're running for president. A videotape emerges late in the campaign in which you admit to being a sexual predator. Another one emerges of you boasting about owning pageants, and you walk into dressing rooms and see naked teenage contestants. Another one emerges of you seeing a cute tween, and suggest you'll date her in 10 years.

Then a video emerges in which all of these predatory sexual actions you've bragged about you admit to doing, not knowing you've been taped admitting this pattern and practice.

Then dozens of women feel empowered to finally tell of their having endured your unwanted grabbing of their genitalia, your barging into their dressing rooms to see them naked. Confirming your unguarded admission of your admitted sexual predatory behavior.

So rather than admit it, apologize, or show contrition, you arrange to have your opponent's husband's alleged infidelities paraded to a debate, thereby "projecting" your behavior upon your opponent.

Last I'm aware, Wiley, Jones and Broderick have only their words to support their claims. Bill clearly had flings with Flowers and Lewinsky, and who knows who else. They had corroborating evidence. As do many of the Moore victims. Yearbook, telling others contemporaneous of his acts. His reputation at his office. Being banned at malls.

Trump? Photos of him with porn actresses, people who received contemporaneous accounts from his victims, as well as the videos of him admitting his lifestyle of misogyny.

But his ego ruined his legal chances for success. Had to call them liars. So he's sued. Will have to sit through excruciating depositions. Don't be fooled to think Allred will handle those depositions. She's the PR end. Not the litigator nor trial counsel. Every one of those videos will be played and he'll be grilled for days in total over them.

Too busy as president for multiple days of depo? They're carefully documenting his rounds of golf to counter his "too busy" motion. The more he lounges about Mar A Lago and drives his golf cart onto greens to more time he'll be ordered to sit for a deposition.
 
Back
Top