The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

According To More Than Two Dozen Sources, FBI Withheld Exculpatory Evidence On FISA Court Application to Spy on Carter Page
https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-...dence-fisa-court-application-spy-carter-page/
That is not a thing. The FBI does not have to show all possible evidence in getting a warrant. They just have to show enough evidence to get approval. An approval that is very difficult to get and goes through multiple stages. Maybe it is as simple as Carter Page openly saying he has influence inside the Kremlin and would not stop meeting with people the FBI warned him face to face were spies. I don't know how much more spotlight someone wants to put on themselves than what he did.
 
War hero my ass.
A lying fucking coward is more like it.
May he rot in hell.

Newly Unsealed Court Documents Reveal Who Shared The Russia Dossier With The FBI And Media
Beth Baumann | @eb454 | March 16, 2019


59a72f0b-63a9-4c62-a82f-ebd66f525eb1.png

Previously sealed court documents reveal how Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and one of his associates, former State Department official David Kramer and McCain Institute fellow, shared the Democratic National Committee-funded Russia dossier with the FBI and various media outlets. McCain previously denied being BuzzFeed's source after the outlet published the dossier.


According to Fox News, "former senior counterintelligence FBI agent Bill Priestap confirmed that the FBI received a copy of the first 33 pages of the dossier in December 2016 from McCain."

In a 2017 court filing, Kramer confirmed that British spy Christopher Steele provided the dossier to him. Kramar then turned around and provided the dossier to reporters at McClatchy, NPR, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, BuzzFeed and CNN’s Carl Bernstein, The Daily Caller reported.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-3-16_17-33-58.gif
    upload_2019-3-16_17-33-58.gif
    43 bytes · Views: 1
War hero my ass.
A lying fucking coward is more like it.
May he rot in hell.

Newly Unsealed Court Documents Reveal Who Shared The Russia Dossier With The FBI And Media ...
Now just a damn minute. I’m supposed to be the parody account of the seriously deranged wingnut reactionary Trump blow hard. Then you fuck it all up with this beauty. Get your shit together.
 
Now just a damn minute. I’m supposed to be the parody account of the seriously deranged wingnut reactionary Trump blow hard. Then you fuck it all up with this beauty. Get your shit together.
Just shows you can't get anymore over the top than lil' joke, he is a disgusting sychophant.
 
That is not a thing. The FBI does not have to show all possible evidence in getting a warrant. They just have to show enough evidence to get approval. An approval that is very difficult to get and goes through multiple stages. Maybe it is as simple as Carter Page openly saying he has influence inside the Kremlin and would not stop meeting with people the FBI warned him face to face were spies. I don't know how much more spotlight someone wants to put on themselves than what he did.
Verifiable
 
Joe is really angry that the dossier is largely true. Makes his fearless leader look bad.




Brilliant: Christopher Steele Admits He Used Random Internet Posters as Trump Dossier Sources

Posted at 7:00 pm on March 16, 2019 by Bonchie


clown-shutterstock-620x411.jpg


I’m tired of using the one picture of Christopher Steele in existence, so enjoy this clown picture instead. It’s still relevant, as you’ll see.





It’s been a busy few days for Fusion GPS and by virtue Steele, the former British spy contracted to compile the Trump dossier. Hillary Clinton was, of course, the person funding all this. She’s escaped essentially all accountability due to our ever willing media.

Earlier today, I covered some of the fall out from documents released by a judge in a now dismissed defamation suit against Fusion GPS. There’s more though, as deposition transcripts of Steele’s testimony in that lawsuit have been released as well. It includes some rather interesting (or infuriating depending on your mood) revelations of just how much of a dumpster fire the dossier itself was.





The Washing Examiner gives us the details.

According to deposition transcripts released this week, Steele said last year he used a 2009 report he found on CNN’s iReport website and said he wasn’t aware that submissions to that site are posted by members of the public and are not checked for accuracy.

A web archive from July 29, 2009 shows that CNN described the site in this manner: “iReport.com is a user-generated site. That means the stories submitted by users are not edited, fact-checked, or screened before they post.”

You’d think a super-spy like Steele, who’ve I’ve been assured is just a virtuous defender of freedom, would understand the need to at least attempt to verify things he finds on the internet. Apparently not though, as he admits in the deposition that he didn’t even know iReport was essentially a message board.

During his deposition, Steele was pressed on the methods he used to verify allegations made about Webzilla, which was thought to be used by Russia to hack into Democratic emails.

When asked if he discovered “anything of relevance concerning Webzilla” during the verification process, Steele replied: “We did. It was an article I have got here which was posted on July 28, 2009, on something called CNN iReport.”

I love this part because in the timeline of the questioning, he doesn’t realize what’s happening at first. He thinks he’s responding by confirming that he got the article from a valid source. Then the lawyer drops the hammer on him.

“I do not have any particular knowledge of that,” Steele said when asked what was his understanding of how the iReport website worked.

When asked if he understood that content on the site was not generated by CNN reporters, he said, “I do not.” He was then asked: “Do you understand that they have no connection to any CNN reporters?” Steele replied, “I do not.”

He was pressed on this further: “Do you understand that CNN iReports are or were nothing more than any random individuals’ assertions on the Internet?” Steele replied: “No, I obviously presume that if it is on a CNN site that it may has some kind of CNN status. Albeit that it may be an independent person posting on the site.”
 
Back
Top