Sean Hannity Love Child?

T

tenacious

PREMIER
Okay... I made up the part about a Sean Hannity love child, but I do know that Cohen didn't just tell the court under oath that Hannity was a client for no reason. Anyway, thought this was a fantastic article in the Washington Post.

The gaping hole in Sean Hannity’s story about being Michael Cohen’s client
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...michael-cohens-client/?utm_term=.e0922a74a675

It's not what it looks like. That's the refrain from Sean Hannity, after lawyers for President Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen, revealed in court on Monday that the Fox News host is one of only three clients that Cohen represented this year and last.

Cohen's previous work included arranging a $130,000 payment to prevent porn star Stormy Daniels from talking publicly about her alleged affair with Trump. And Cohen's work for the other client on his short list, Republican fundraiser Elliott Broidy, included negotiating a $1.6 million settlement with a former Playboy model who got pregnant when she and Broidy had an affair.

So what it looks like, of course, is that Cohen could have similarly helped Hannity silence a woman who might have told an embarrassing story. That is not the case, Hannity insisted on his radio show.

“I tell you why they're going nuts,” Hannity said of the media. “They're assuming — because I guess he did some type of work for some Republican guy — they're figuring, 'Oh, he must've done a big settlement case for Hannity.' That's not — no, that's not what happened. Ever.”

“Not one of any issue I ever dealt with Michael Cohen on ever — ever — involved a matter between me and any third party,” Hannity added.

Hannity's denial is a bit confusing. Hannity sought Cohen's legal counsel only on matters involving Hannity and himself?

It is also unclear why, if Cohen's work for Hannity was innocuous, the two men sought to keep their relationship secret. In a letter to the court Monday morning, Cohen's lawyers said his third recent client, besides Trump and Broidy, wished to remain anonymous.

“As to the one unnamed legal client, we do not believe that Mr. Cohen should be asked to reveal the name or can permissibly do so,” the letter said. A federal judge disagreed.

But there is an even bigger hole in Hannity's explanation: Why, as he railed against FBI raids of Cohen's office, home and hotel room last week, did Hannity not disclose to viewers and listeners that his communications with Cohen could have been among the materials seized?

“We have now entered a dangerous phase,” Hannity said on TV on the day of the raids, without mentioning any potential danger to himself.

A Fox News spokeswoman did not respond to a Fix inquiry on this point. Instead, the network issued the following statement, attributed to Hannity: “Michael Cohen has never represented me in any matter. I never retained him, received an invoice, or paid legal fees. I have occasionally had brief discussions with him about legal questions about which I wanted his input and perspective. I assumed those conversations were confidential but, to be absolutely clear, they never involved any matter between me and a third party.”

On the radio, Hannity did not directly address his lack of disclosure but hinted at a possible defense — that he did not consider himself a formal client of Cohen's.

That Cohen's attorneys included Hannity's name on a list of clients presented in court “just shows that Michael was doing his due diligence and being totally thorough about anybody that he might have had attorney-client privilege with,” Hannity told listeners.

Hannity made further comments that appear to be somewhat inconsistent with the statement he issued through Fox News. He said that he might have paid Cohen a small fee, after all, and said he did not merely assume that their conversations were privileged but rather sought assurances.

“I might have handed him 10 bucks [and said,] 'I definitely want your attorney-client privilege on this,' ” Hannity said on the radio. “Something like that. I requested that privilege with him when I would ask him: 'Well, this just came up. What do you think about this? What do you think about that?' ”

As a commentator, Hannity need not be neutral. But as a self-described “opinion journalist,” he could reasonably be expected to divulge a conflict of interest such as the one involving Cohen.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
source.gif
 
Wez said:
source.gif
Click to expand...

Haha....
Imagine if this story ends up with a trip to Planned Parenthood instead of a love child? Its like one of those movies where you can't even guess the ending. It's going to be crazier then anything you can dream up...
 
Last edited:
Michael Cohen.... this is an open letter to you. Don't know if you read So Cal Soccer dot com or not, but if you do I'd love to buy the rights to your story. I will make you look like such a bad ass. Part Wolf of Wall Street, part Dirty Hairy, part Confessions of a Dangerous Mind. Call me!!
 
tenacious said:
Haha....
Imagine if this story ends up with a trip to Planned Parenthood instead of a love child? Its like one of those movies where you can't even guess where it will end up.
Click to expand...
Imagine if novemeber 2016 never happened and hitlery was la presidenta.
Imagine if you people caught a wiff of something the commie left didnt pipe in.
Imagine how Trump became hitler the day he ran for President as a republican.
Imagine.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
Imagine if novemeber 2016 never happened and hitlery was la presidenta.
Imagine if you people caught a wiff of something the commie left didnt pipe in.
Imagine how Trump became hitler the day he ran for President as a republican.
Imagine.
Click to expand...
Wipe your cheek off he's yours and you're his bitch.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
Imagine if novemeber 2016 never happened and hitlery was la presidenta.
Imagine if you people caught a wiff of something the commie left didnt pipe in.
Imagine how Trump became hitler the day he ran for President as a republican.
Imagine.
Click to expand...

Yes yes... watch out for Hillary and Trump is a victim. Old news...
Honestly Ricky, how do you see this Cohen-Hannity thing ending? It would be nice to hear some thoughts on the news of the day rather then re-hashed attacks on Hillary.
 
Last edited:
tenacious said:
Try wait? Umm... half the fun is waiting. Haven't you been reading my posts? The crazy train has gone off the rails and now it's just waiting for the crash- because everyone knows it going to be wilder/weirder then fiction.
Click to expand...
I'll wait until I know a little more before I speculate.
Thats just me.
We all have our own ways of doing things.

What do you think hannity did?
Let it all out.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
I'll wait until I know a little more before I speculate.
Thats just me.
We all have our own ways of doing things.

What do you think hannity did?
Let it all out.
Click to expand...

I think Hannity hired a guy who fixes girl problems for powerful men. At least those are the facts as much as we know...
Now it's my turn to ask a question. Why do you think Hannity hired a guy who fixes girl problems?
 
tenacious said:
I think Hannity hired a guy who fixes girl problems for powerful men. At least those are the facts as much as we know...
Now it's my turn to ask a question. Why do you think Hannity hired a guy who fixes girl problems?
Click to expand...
I dont know.
Maybe he had girl problems.
I honestly dont have a clue.

Tell me what you think.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
I dont know.
Maybe he had girl problems.
I honestly dont have a clue.

Tell me what you think.
Click to expand...

I think he hired that particular lawyer because he has girl problems. You keep asking me what I think, not sure how else to say it...

But where it gets fun, if imagining what those girls problems could be. As if it had ended well, there wouldn't be a lawyer involved.
 
tenacious said:
I think he hired that particular lawyer because he has girl problems. You keep asking me what I think, not sure how else to say it...

But where it gets fun, if imagining what those girls problems could be. As if it had ended well, there wouldn't be a lawyer involved.
Click to expand...
The always asking questions but never responding to the ones asked of them is a basic troll tactic for the reich wing nutter brigade . . . just like their revered hero Il Duce Trump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top