stoppagetime
BRONZE
Hoping for some wisdom from more experienced soccer parents...
Have a youngers DD on a good team...they can win some good tournaments in flight 2, but not enough talent and athleticism as a team to be competitive with say the top 5 or 6 teams in Southern California. Based on the way the coach plays my DD, she's ranked somewhere around #9-12 on a 15-16 player roster...starts most games but often the first one subbed out. Generally, plays half to 3/4 of game time. Lately, has had to play other than her preferred position as coach makes tactical adjustments to cover for some weakness in other areas. By the way, my DD is skilled with good vision and field awareness, but is not hyper-athletic with hyper work rate and is still on the smaller side of physical stature for her age.
During this tryout season, we may have uncovered an opportunity to move her to a very good team (top 5), where the level of play and competition would be a noticeable notch up from her current team. Likely on this new team she would likely be ranked #13-14 on a 14-15 player roster. While we are encouraged by what we are hearing from this team's coach in terms of what he likes about her and seeing how our DD fits the team, we have no idea what the playing time situation will be...but we do know enough to know that if one doesn't know, it probably means a lot less time than one thinks.
So, the question for those with many more years of experience and who have maybe faced similar situations with their own DDs (setting aside cost and commute and other externalities at least for the moment):
Is it better to have more playing time on a good team, or sacrifice that playing time for playing/training with better players against better competition?
Have a youngers DD on a good team...they can win some good tournaments in flight 2, but not enough talent and athleticism as a team to be competitive with say the top 5 or 6 teams in Southern California. Based on the way the coach plays my DD, she's ranked somewhere around #9-12 on a 15-16 player roster...starts most games but often the first one subbed out. Generally, plays half to 3/4 of game time. Lately, has had to play other than her preferred position as coach makes tactical adjustments to cover for some weakness in other areas. By the way, my DD is skilled with good vision and field awareness, but is not hyper-athletic with hyper work rate and is still on the smaller side of physical stature for her age.
During this tryout season, we may have uncovered an opportunity to move her to a very good team (top 5), where the level of play and competition would be a noticeable notch up from her current team. Likely on this new team she would likely be ranked #13-14 on a 14-15 player roster. While we are encouraged by what we are hearing from this team's coach in terms of what he likes about her and seeing how our DD fits the team, we have no idea what the playing time situation will be...but we do know enough to know that if one doesn't know, it probably means a lot less time than one thinks.
So, the question for those with many more years of experience and who have maybe faced similar situations with their own DDs (setting aside cost and commute and other externalities at least for the moment):
Is it better to have more playing time on a good team, or sacrifice that playing time for playing/training with better players against better competition?