SocalSoccer2307
BRONZE
Hi everyone,
I've been following developments in the local youth soccer scene with growing concern—and after speaking with many others who share my view, I feel compelled to express my opinion that the larger clubs are consolidating power and using their financial influence to dominate SOCAL Soccer League’s decision-making processes. It appears that board members from these major clubs, whose interests directly conflict with the league’s core mission, are increasingly taking control of leadership roles.
SOCAL Soccer League's bylaws state clearly:
Moreover, the league’s own introduction promises:
Southern California has long been recognized as the epicenter of youth soccer in America—a national leader in player development. If SOCAL Soccer League can drive positive change in our area by insisting on fairness and transparency, it could set a precedent that uplifts the entire system for the betterment of all youth soccer athletes in the future.
It is highly concerning that almost every single parent I speak with expresses that they put their kid in these mega clubs because a smaller independent club will not even have a shot at making it into SOCAL Soccer League. These parents are determined to have their children play in SOCAL Soccer League and are convinced that the larger clubs with 50+ teams receive better game schedules, placements, and flight placements, among virtually everything else they want. They also don’t want their club to be disrupted by issues from the league—a sentiment that underscores a growing divide in our community.
Furthermore, SOCAL Soccer League’s bylaws mandate that:
When board positions are filled predominantly by representatives of the big clubs, it creates a clear conflict with the league’s promise of an inclusive and developmental environment. This isn’t just about governance—it’s about the kids. The focus of SOCAL Soccer League should be on providing every player with the tools to achieve their goals and dreams—not on protecting the financial interests of a few large clubs or maintaining a good old boys club.
I'm eager to hear from anyone with firsthand experience or additional insights:
Thanks
I've been following developments in the local youth soccer scene with growing concern—and after speaking with many others who share my view, I feel compelled to express my opinion that the larger clubs are consolidating power and using their financial influence to dominate SOCAL Soccer League’s decision-making processes. It appears that board members from these major clubs, whose interests directly conflict with the league’s core mission, are increasingly taking control of leadership roles.
SOCAL Soccer League's bylaws state clearly:
"The principal mission of the Southern California Developmental Soccer League (the “Corporation”) referred to as SOCAL in these ByLaws is to allow all participating clubs to have the freedom to make decisions that are in the best interest of all their players and to place the League’s priority first and foremost on true player development. All SOCAL clubs understand that the landscape of youth soccer is dramatically changing across the country and the philosophy of the Corporation ensures that players of all abilities will be training or competing in an environment that allows them to reach their full potential. Southern California has always been a national leader in player development and the creation of the Corporation is a major step in ensuring that trend continues for many years to come. In the new league all players will have the necessary tools to make their goals and dreams become a reality."
—BYLAWS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DEVELOPMENTAL SOCCER LEAGUE, ARTICLE I
Moreover, the league’s own introduction promises:
"SOCAL Soccer League is a premier youth competitive soccer organization dedicated to growth, teamwork, and excellence both on and off the field. Established as a cornerstone of the Southern California soccer community, SOCAL has built a reputation for providing a competitive and inclusive environment that develops players, coaches, and clubs to their fullest potential."
—Becoming SOCAL
Southern California has long been recognized as the epicenter of youth soccer in America—a national leader in player development. If SOCAL Soccer League can drive positive change in our area by insisting on fairness and transparency, it could set a precedent that uplifts the entire system for the betterment of all youth soccer athletes in the future.
It is highly concerning that almost every single parent I speak with expresses that they put their kid in these mega clubs because a smaller independent club will not even have a shot at making it into SOCAL Soccer League. These parents are determined to have their children play in SOCAL Soccer League and are convinced that the larger clubs with 50+ teams receive better game schedules, placements, and flight placements, among virtually everything else they want. They also don’t want their club to be disrupted by issues from the league—a sentiment that underscores a growing divide in our community.
Furthermore, SOCAL Soccer League’s bylaws mandate that:
"No DOCR member, Technical Director, or Board of Directors member may vote on any issue that specifically and directly involves his/her individual Member Club or any of its teams. No DOCR member or Board of Directors member may act on issues that have a direct impact on teams playing within his/her individual club. Members of the Corporation Board voting on issues in which a conflict of interest exists for them are subject to immediate removal from the Board of Directors as specified within these bylaws."
—BYLAWS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DEVELOPMENTAL SOCCER LEAGUE, ARTICLE XVII
When board positions are filled predominantly by representatives of the big clubs, it creates a clear conflict with the league’s promise of an inclusive and developmental environment. This isn’t just about governance—it’s about the kids. The focus of SOCAL Soccer League should be on providing every player with the tools to achieve their goals and dreams—not on protecting the financial interests of a few large clubs or maintaining a good old boys club.
I'm eager to hear from anyone with firsthand experience or additional insights:
- Have you noticed board decisions favoring the big clubs over smaller, independent ones?
- Have you or someone you know experienced instances where new clubs were unfairly excluded?
- What steps have you taken to address these issues, and what responses have you received from higher authorities?
Thanks