It's an objective fact that ECNL is better. But I do think there are different ways of looking at it. Speaking only for the 2012 age group. We play for the top GA team in the Southwest. If you play for the top team/teams in either league you have multiple opportunities for showcases, playoffs, finals, etc... and the scouts are at both. The difference, from what i've seen, is that the southwest ECNL is much stronger on the top end. Surf, Blues, Slammer Koge, Slammers, Beach and sort of Rebels, and Legends. GA in that age group is City SC and then there is everyone else, maybe Albion but not really. Not in our age group at least. Nationally GA has strong teams, Cincinnati United, Chicago FC United, NEFC, HTX, Lou Fusz, Tophat, etc... and they are putting girls in D1. The top teams are on par with ECNL as far as D1 commits. NEFC has 20 D1 commits. 6th most nationally. The opportunity is there but the depth isn't. ECNL or GA, if you aren't making it to Playoffs, Champions cup, Finals it doesn't really matter who you play for. Probably a strong chance you aren't D1 material if you aren't on one of those teams. Especially in socal where geography isn't as much of a factor. If you are playing for the top GA teams, you have a great chance to play D1. The same can't be said if you are just playing for an ECNL team. It works the same way. You have to be playing for the top teams. ECNL just has more. What irritates me is how strongly some feel about the leagues. A lot of ECNL or bust attitudes.