Let Them Play CA

EOTL said:
I get why people here don’t like me. If you want to call out idiots as you claim, you should probably do that with the bigots here. If you got them to stfu and to state their opinions about social distancing in a non-offensive manner, you’d have no problems with me. The real problem, though, is that most of the people here who aren’t blatant in-your-face racists don’t have a problem with those who are. The other problem, of course, is that you can’t make them stop by being polite, which makes my way the only one.
Click to expand...

You’re a bigot. You support boys in dresses competing against girls but called out female, college athletes raising awareness to possible abuse by their coach!

How the fuck do you NOT see what a hypocrite you are?
 
EOTL said:
I get why people here don’t like me. If you want to call out idiots as you claim, you should probably do that with the bigots here. If you got them to stfu and to state their opinions about social distancing in a non-offensive manner, you’d have no problems with me. The real problem, though, is that most of the people here who aren’t blatant in-your-face racists don’t have a problem with those who are. The other problem, of course, is that you can’t make them stop by being polite, which makes my way the only one.
Click to expand...

I really don't think you do. I appreciate the reduced tone, but its relatively easy to see through. The issue with most narcissists is they can't separate from their reality long enough to see other things. I will stand right by your side and call out any racists, homophobics or misogynists right along with you if it is warranted. Your issue is, these are the terms you define people with for simply disagreeing with you. We could go back through all the threads you have ruined and find example after example. In your mind, someone who wants a border wall or doesn't support BLM is a racist. You think anyone that disagrees with the USWNT is a misogynist. You think someone who takes issue with a girl who has a cock wanting to play girls sports is transphobic.

Ultimately, the issues most of us have with you don't have much to do with any of the hot button topics or buzz word bingo you get involved in. Most of us understand people have different opinions and that is what makes this country great. Our main issue with you is you are just pretty shit at being a human.

As for non-offensive manners, that is solely in the eye of the beholder. Remember, being offended is a choice someone makes. I have neve once been offended with anything you have posted, despite seeing the world completely differently. Mainly because I choose not to be, but also because I dealing with people like you becomes very tiresome.
 
Scott m Shurson said:
You’re a bigot. You support boys in dresses competing against girls but called out female, college athletes raising awareness to possible abuse by their coach!

How the fuck do you NOT see what a hypocrite you are?
Click to expand...

Because I am not a hypocrite. There is nothing wrong with questioning the motivations of any person who makes dubious and vague allegations of abuse, especially when what is alleged does not constitute abuse. If a transgender athlete made dubious allegations of wrongdoing that led to understandable concerns about the veracity of what she was saying, I would hold her accountable as well.

There mere fact that you would try to equate the two is, well, transphobia. I should also add that I did not use offensive terminology to describe them. That is all you magat.
 
EOTL said:
Because I am not a hypocrite. There is nothing wrong with questioning the motivations of any person who makes dubious and vague allegations of abuse, especially when what is alleged does not constitute abuse. If a transgender athlete made dubious allegations of wrongdoing that led to understandable concerns about the veracity of what she was saying, I would hold her accountable as well.

There mere fact that you would try to equate the two is, well, transphobia. I should also add that I did not use offensive terminology to describe them. That is all you magat.
Click to expand...

The mere fact you can’t see it means, well, you’re narcissistic. And who the fuck are YOU to decide what a dozen women find abusive? If it was 3 chicks with dicks, you’d shit the bed.

HYPOCRITE!
 
texanincali said:
I really don't think you do. I appreciate the reduced tone, but its relatively easy to see through. The issue with most narcissists is they can't separate from their reality long enough to see other things. I will stand right by your side and call out any racists, homophobics or misogynists right along with you if it is warranted. Your issue is, these are the terms you define people with for simply disagreeing with you. We could go back through all the threads you have ruined and find example after example. In your mind, someone who wants a border wall or doesn't support BLM is a racist. You think anyone that disagrees with the USWNT is a misogynist. You think someone who takes issue with a girl who has a cock wanting to play girls sports is transphobic.

Ultimately, the issues most of us have with you don't have much to do with any of the hot button topics or buzz word bingo you get involved in. Most of us understand people have different opinions and that is what makes this country great. Our main issue with you is you are just pretty shit at being a human.

As for non-offensive manners, that is solely in the eye of the beholder. Remember, being offended is a choice someone makes. I have neve once been offended with anything you have posted, despite seeing the world completely differently. Mainly because I choose not to be, but also because I dealing with people like you becomes very tiresome.
Click to expand...

Nope, wrong you are. If you want to hold people accountable for bigotry, do it. Don’t blame me for ruining threads when others already started down that road. It seems to me that you suffer from bias if you don’t see it already happening and then blame me for pushing y’all the rest of the way down the rabbit hole.

Being offended is not a choice one makes when they are being discriminated against or harassed btw. You’re just victim blaming.
 
texanincali said:
Wrong. It’s always a choice. Your just wanting to play the victim.
Click to expand...

BS. If someone isn’t hired because of their transgender status, that is not their choice. If. someone is berated, spit on, assaulted, that is not their choice. The fact that you’re ok with people treating others lime s**t due their transgender, or racial, or gender status, well, that is pretty f**ked up. It makes you a collaborator. All the more reason for me to be here since you’ll just let people be as offensive as they want and, in fact, only get on the case of those who don’t let it pass. Sorry not sorry to get in the way of your substitute for Parler.
 
EOTL said:
BS. If someone isn’t hired because of their transgender status, that is not their choice. If. someone is berated, spit on, assaulted, that is not their choice. The fact that you’re ok with people treating others lime s**t due their transgender, or racial, or gender status, well, that is pretty f**ked up. It makes you a collaborator. All the more reason for me to be here since you’ll just let people be as offensive as they want and, in fact, only get on the case of those who don’t let it pass. Sorry not sorry to get in the way of your substitute for Parler.
Click to expand...

Where in any of the drivel you just spent time typing are you discussing being offended. If someone isn't hired because they are transgender, that is wrong...unless its a strip club. If someone is assaulted, spit on or berated because they are a certain race or sex, that is also wrong. I'm not sure what that has to do with being offended. There are plenty of people this happens to every day that choose to ignore the idiots and get on with it. Being offensive is a choice, just like being offended.
 
EOTL said:
The fact that you’re ok with people treating others lime s**t due their transgender, or racial, or gender status, well, that is pretty f**ked up.
Click to expand...

No clue where this is coming from. I'm relatively certain this doesn't apply to one single person on here. Again, the issue is you only see through your lens when defining these things.
 
Grace T. said:
Agree but the Cheney thing is similar to the George Will, Bill Kristol and even George Bush thing. That split is less RINO/populist than neocon/populist. Trump populism leaned away from foreign interventionism (of the modern President, Trump put us into the fewest entanglements) and away from multilateralism in favor of America first. The neocons despise Trumpism for that because they view it as walking away from our responsibilities as a superpower. Trumpism was not just a rejection of the way Obama ran the country, but also of the Bush version of the Republican party, both in its "compassionate conservativity" and the neocon foreign policy that led to the Iraq war.
Click to expand...
Agreed, good summary.
 
dad4 said:
There were a couple on the right who got called out, but they mostly got themselves banned.

I think it mostly just reflects the national mood. You have a few principled conservatives, like Cheney and Romney. But they get drowned out by tribalism.

How do you not bust a gut laughing at the idea that Cheney is a RINO? It's like saying Bernie is a hawk.

Same happens on the left. You have to be extremely careful with your wording if you want to think any more deeply than blaming "systemic racism" for everything under the sun.

So people take the safe path. It just leads nowhere.
Click to expand...
Principles conservatives?Specifically, which Trump actions, policies and nominations weren't solidly concervative?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top