Let the Principals & Teachers Decide

MacDre said:
Not kids. The school policy.
Click to expand...
Children of politicians deserve some privacy.

I find it interesting that you chose that school policy solely because it is so interesting and well researched. Perhaps the writing is so impressive that it reminds you of Baron Edward George Earle Bulwer-Lytton himself. Or maybe you wanted to bring the kid's school into it to make some point about Trump.

Trump is self mocking. You can leave the school out of it, and I guarantee you won't lack for material.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
They learn more about the virus everyday and one thing they know is it affects people differently, why, they don't know yet. Dr. Fauci is a legend in the world of viral infection science. Who are you?
Click to expand...

Hey I don't doubt Fauci is a legend and knows what he is doing in the world of viral infection science. But that doesn't mean he's a competent decision maker. It doesn't mean he's good at reading people or situations. He's great within his knowledge base but doesn't know much about things outside of it. He doesn't know economics. He doesn't know education. He's not looking at the suicides, mental illness, ODs, alcoholism that results from his recommendations. He's also not being tested, so he'll go the most conservative route possible (hence why the UK White Paper suggests overreliance on experts and a remedy by creating a market of experts as well as a devil's advocate to argue against). He's a horrible policy maker, and his beach chair incident illustrates he's an even worse sales person, and he frankly seems enamored by his moment in the sun and his arrogance (which makes him prone to lie to the pleb) serves to undermine his message.

2 examples of the dangers of deferring to experts: 1. the doctors (including 1 very high reputable guy in his field) told me to wait and see what happened with an antibiotic....that I hadn't given it a lot of time....I knew something was very wrong and argued and it wound up saving my life with a recent infection. 2. Our school reopening committee staffed the working group with a bunch of doctors and educators that built an elaborated scheme to make it "safe" to reopen....but the week before the governor's announcement it was already falling apart like a house of cards....they needed a lawyer on the committee....lawyers are trained to see everything wrong with something (not to find solutions)....they needed a lawyer on the committee to take pot shots at their ideas and tell them what was wrong with it, because they couldn't see their noses in front of their faces.

I'm sure Fauci's a good guy and knows his field well. He is unsuited though to make these decisions, and the stress is making his personality flaws show (the same way they did Trump). Could I have done better? Don't know...you don't know until you are in that moment....I'll tell you this though I got a lot more right than he did (everything from seeing the lockdowns months out, to timing the stock market the day it dived, to the pattern in Socal, the school fall closures, and even the IFR down to a .1%).
 
dad4 said:
Children of politicians deserve some privacy.

I find it interesting that you chose that school policy solely because it is so interesting and well researched. Perhaps the writing is so impressive that it reminds you of Baron Edward George Earle Bulwer-Lytton himself. Or maybe you wanted to bring the kid's school into it to make some point about Trump.

Trump is self mocking. You can leave the school out of it, and I guarantee you won't lack for material.
Click to expand...

Dre’s post has nothing to do with targeting the kid. It just illustrates that despite Trump’s push to get schools open, even one in which he may have personal influence, it is not as easy as it seems. I think you are overreacting.
 
EOTL said:
Nah, let’s stay on topic and talk about how incredibly stupid @Banana Hammock and @Desert Hound must be to think teachers are “government’s big money donor”. How they think a 300,000 member teachers union that has spent $242 million over 25 years ($806 a person, or $32 a person per year) is bad, but one person alone spending $400 million in two years is fine.
Click to expand...
You don’t like the law then change it.
 
Justafan said:
Look at your post, you’re already whining like a little bitch.
Click to expand...

Nope.....I use an open Forum like it should be used.

Freedom of Speech includes freedom to use it....

If you don't like my dialogue and the TRUTH, then
don't " Engage " ....if you want to engage in a topic
that is being misconstrued and support the LIES...
Then be prepared for a very STRONG rebuttal that
includes the TRUTH.....

You and yours want to change the rules because YOU
are losing your ass....Doesn't work like that in the REAL
WORLD......Grow a Pair ya sniveling Bitch....!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top