The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Then refute the source, all you do is cry about the link not agreeing with your uneducated, unsupported opinion.

Rather than continuing this, I suggest you go back and read the thread. I did refute the link as a bias hack piece and pointed to the authors own words. You are who you are...enjoy the day.
 
28795786_739835749554450_7659155169562676338_n.jpg
Cheeto?
 
t has gone soft on illegal alien employers?
These effing nutters don't care what he does, he could say it's clemency day by freeing all federal prisoners, opening the borders and bestowing instant citizenship on anyone who applies and they would cheer him for it.
They just like seeing someone as crazy or crazier than them in the White House disturbing all those people who have held them back all these years . . . all those "others". Nutters are the 'aggrieved party' in this case.
 
OBVI....since 11/8 for sure. QTCB
So you agree. A number of things may happen as a result of this aberration from the norm. I would like to think a realignment back to strict norms and ethical standards would be in store for DC. Where America goes much of the world follows . . . no matter what policies or ideology one favors we have gone far from the path of democracy and that's not good. China is making their president a virtual Emperor for life? Leaders from around the world are quoting "Fake news" as an excuse to jail those who attempt to question them.

The number of journalists jailed around the world in connection with their work has reached a record high of 262, according to a new report, with just over half of them imprisoned in Turkey, China or Egypt.

Nearly three-quarters of the detained journalists were jailed after being accused of antigovernment activities, many of them under broad and vague counterterrorism laws. A record number, 21, were jailed on charges of “false news,” a term that has gained resonance as strongmen have embraced President Trump’s attacks on “fake news” to silence critics.

The Committee to Protect Journalists, an advocacy group that does an annual count of detained journalists, said in its report that Mr. Trump had “cozied up to strongmen” and done little to stand up for human rights.

“President Donald Trump’s nationalistic rhetoric, fixation on Islamic extremism, and insistence on labeling critical media ‘fake news’ serves to reinforce the framework of accusations and legal charges that allow such leaders to preside over the jailing of journalists,” the group said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/13/...-jailed-committee-to-protect-journalists.html

Yet the institutional safeguards protecting our democracy may be less effective than we think. A well-designed constitution is not enough to ensure a stable democracy — a lesson many Latin American independence leaders learned when they borrowed the American constitutional model in the early 19th century, only to see their countries plunge into chaos.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/16/opinion/sunday/is-donald-trump-a-threat-to-democracy.html
 
These effing nutters don't care what he does, he could say it's clemency day by freeing all federal prisoners, opening the borders and bestowing instant citizenship on anyone who applies and they would cheer him for it.
They just like seeing someone as crazy or crazier than them in the White House disturbing all those people who have held them back all these years . . . all those "others". Nutters are the 'aggrieved party' in this case.
There's the babble we all know and love to make fun of, do you really think we give a fuck about your opinion of us or the Donald?
You ain't that impressive, union boy.
 
There's the babble we all know and love to make fun of, do you really think we give a fuck about your opinion of us or the Donald?
You ain't that impressive, union boy.
That, of course, is your opinion . . . the opinion of a small minded, obsessed, hypocrite and extremely twisted individual. Good luck with all that in the real world.
 
I think that Ricky is showing he doesn’t believe in scientific consensus. Of course, we knew that. He believes what the oil companies tell him, not what the scientists tell him. He probably doesn’t believe in evolution either.
Do you believe the scientists regarding transexuals?
 
Do you believe the scientists regarding transexuals?
Haven’t read them on the subject. I believe them when they all (basically all) tell us that man is contributing to substantial climate change and I believe them about evolution. Now that we are a dumb country in the world, whereas we used to be one of the best educated, a substantial number of us don’t believe the science. What does science tell us about transsexuals, pray tell?
 
Back
Top