Ponderable

Something to ponder...
_____________________________________________________________
Immigration Lies and Hypocrisy

Walter E. Williams


President Donald Trump reportedly asked why the U.S. is "having all these people from sh*thole countries come here." I think he could have used better language, but it's a question that should be asked and answered. I have a few questions for my fellow Americans to consider. How many Norwegians have illegally entered our nation, committed crimes and burdened our prison and welfare systems? I might ask the same question about Finnish, Swedish, Welsh, Icelanders, Greenlanders and New Zealanders. The bulk of our immigration problem is with people who enter our country criminally from Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean, Africa and the Middle East. It's illegal immigrants from those countries who have committed crimes and burdened our criminal justice and welfare systems. A large number of immigrants who are here illegally -- perhaps the majority are law-abiding in other respects -- have fled oppressive, brutal and corrupt regimes to seek a better life in America.

In the debate about illegal immigration, there are questions that are not explicitly asked but can be answered with a straight "yes" or "no": Does everyone in the world have a right to live in the U.S.? Do Americans have a right to decide who and under what conditions a person may enter our country? Should we permit foreigners landing at our airports to ignore U.S. border control laws just as some ignore our laws at our southern border? The reason those questions are not asked is that one would be deemed an idiot for saying that everyone in the world has a right to live in our country, that Americans don't have a right to decide who lives in our country and that foreigners landing at our airports have a right to just ignore U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents.

Immigration today, even when legal, is different from the immigration of yesteryear. People who came here in the 19th century and most of the 20th century came here to learn our language, learn our customs and become Americans. Years ago, there was a guarantee that immigrants came here to work, because there was no welfare system; they worked, begged or starved. Today, there is no such assurance. Because of our welfare state, immigrants can come here and live off taxpaying Americans.

There is another difference between today and yesteryear. Today, Americans are taught multiculturalism throughout their primary, secondary and college education. They are taught that one culture is no better or worse than another. To believe otherwise is criticized at best as Eurocentrism and at worst as racism. As a result, some immigrant groups seek to bring to our country the cultural values whose failures have led to the poverty, corruption and human rights violations in their home countries that caused them to flee. As the fallout from President Trump's indelicate remarks demonstrates, too many Americans are afraid and unwilling to ask which immigrant groups have become a burden to our nation and which have made a contribution to the greatness of America.

Very unfortunate for our nation is that we have political groups that seek to use illegal immigration for their own benefit. They've created sanctuary cities and states that openly harbor criminals -- people who have broken our laws. The whole concept of sanctuary cities is to give aid, comfort and sympathy to people who have broken our laws. Supporters want to prevent them from having to hide and live in fear of discovery. I'd ask whether, for the sake of equality before the law, we should apply the sanctuary concept to Americans who have broken other laws, such as robbers and tax evaders.

We should not fall prey to people who criticize our efforts to combat illegal immigration and who pompously say, "We're a nation of immigrants!" The debate is not over immigration. The debate is over illegal immigration. My sentiments on immigrants who are here legally and who want to become Americans are expressed by the sentiments in Emma Lazarus' poem "The New Colossus," which is on a plaque inside the Statue of Liberty and in part says, "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free."

https://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2018/01/31/immigration-lies-and-hypocrisy-n2441145
 
Those companies are free to reduce their bottom line if they wish. And their bond holders and stock holders are free to sell as they reduce risk to their portfolios. 5 million NRA members can probably still use multiple discounts from affiliations (Military, AAA, etc.) with other than the NRA. And if banks want to stop making money off NRA credit cards they are free to do so. Hell they all had their taxes reduced so they may be able to exercise some freedoms that the government previously denied them through higher corporate taxes. Ain't freedom grand?!!

Freedom indeed! Freedom from the NRA for the US Congress is the goal. The NRA has held the US congress hostage for decades, to the point that Stockholm syndrome has set in.

Having the for profit gun industry dictate our gun laws is like having the fox guard the hen house.
 
Freedom indeed! Freedom from the NRA for the US Congress is the goal. The NRA has held the US congress hostage for decades, to the point that Stockholm syndrome has set in.

Having the for profit gun industry dictate our gun laws is like having the fox guard the hen house.
Read the second amendment. Take notes if need be.
Read the most recent decisions concerning guns & the second amendment by the SCOTUS. Have someone explain the rulings.
Enjoy!
 
Read the second amendment. Take notes if need be.
Read the most recent decisions concerning guns & the second amendment by the SCOTUS. Have someone explain the rulings.
Enjoy!

Who said anything about the 2nd amendment? Your response is like that of a trained seal. You get an A+ from the NRA.
So, you don't think the NRA is holding congress hostage?
Do you think it is a good idea for the gun lobbyists to write our gun laws?
 
1791 top-of-the-line arms --

Revolutionary-Rifles.jpg
 
Freedom indeed! Freedom from the NRA for the US Congress is the goal. The NRA has held the US congress hostage for decades, to the point that Stockholm syndrome has set in.

Having the for profit gun industry dictate our gun laws is like having the fox guard the hen house.
The government has to have a gun industry to buy their guns from. So they can enforce gun laws and monopolize violence.
 
Who said anything about the 2nd amendment? Your response is like that of a trained seal. You get an A+ from the NRA.
So, you don't think the NRA is holding congress hostage?
Do you think it is a good idea for the gun lobbyists to write our gun laws?
You sound like a mindless pc moron...what a minute... you are a mindless pc moron.
A+ from the NRA and I didn't even have to join....cool.
In this day and age seemingly every gun law is appealed to the SCOTUS...they have the final say.
So yeah I'm okay...
 
Who said anything about the 2nd amendment? Your response is like that of a trained seal. You get an A+ from the NRA.
So, you don't think the NRA is holding congress hostage?
Do you think it is a good idea for the gun lobbyists to write our gun laws?
Did they write the no waiting period law to purchase an AR-15 in FL?
 
The intent of the framers was not for us to have the right to own 200 year old weapons.
It was for a free people to be able to defend ourselves against tyranny.

They had seen technology advance, and were quite aware, as we are, that "guns" would evolve.
It's sad that one must explain history to grown ups...
 
The intent of the framers was not for us to have the right to own 200 year old weapons.
It was for a free people to be able to defend ourselves against tyranny.

They had seen technology advance, and were quite aware, as we are, that "guns" would evolve.

I'm sure you have some historical quote or court decision to back that up.
 
Back
Top