Trump Supporters out to Destroy America

LOL !!!

If you want to keep protecting the criminal in the White House -- Vote Republican! If you want full and fair investigations into the corruption in the White House - VOTE DEMOCRATIC!

Let me help your cause.
What do you think about all the corruption from Obama's FBI and his DOJ that we are finding out about now?
 
Anyone surprised?


Senate Judiciary panel says no evidence found to support accusations against Kavanaugh


The Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report, in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.

"Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process," the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.

"In neither the committee's investigation nor in the supplemental background investigation conducted by the FBI was there ANY evidence to substantiate or corroborate any of the allegations."

The committee investigators "found no verifiable evidence that supported" Christine Blasey Ford's allegation that Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed in the early 1980s and attempted to remove her clothes while covering her mouth with one hand.

"The witnesses that Dr. Ford identified as individuals who could corroborate her allegations failed to do so, and in fact, contradicted her," the report notes.

It also states that committee investigators "found no verifiable evidence" to support Deborah Ramirez's claim that Kavanaugh exposed himself to her at a party when they were both at Yale.

The report additionally dismisses allegations from Julie Swetnick, forwarded by lawyer Michael Avenatti.

"Indeed, the evidence appears to support the position that Julie Swetnick and Mr. Avenatti criminally conspired to make materially false statements to the Committee and obstruct the Committee's investigation," the report writes.

Avenatti and Swetnick have both been referred to the Department of Justice for potential criminal investigations into their behavior during Kavanaugh's confirmation process. Avenatti was referred a second time for his actions.

In addition, the report details that investigators were also unable to locate supporting evidence for the several anonymous accusations against Kavanaugh, noting that one of the accusers has been referred for a criminal investigation.

Kavanaugh passionately denied all of the allegations against him and was ultimately confirmed after a brutal confirmation fight on Oct. 7 by a vote largely down party lines.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...port-accusations-against-kavanaugh/ar-BBPkcRU
 
Anyone surprised?


Senate Judiciary panel says no evidence found to support accusations against Kavanaugh


The Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report, in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.

"Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process," the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.

"In neither the committee's investigation nor in the supplemental background investigation conducted by the FBI was there ANY evidence to substantiate or corroborate any of the allegations."

The committee investigators "found no verifiable evidence that supported" Christine Blasey Ford's allegation that Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed in the early 1980s and attempted to remove her clothes while covering her mouth with one hand.

"The witnesses that Dr. Ford identified as individuals who could corroborate her allegations failed to do so, and in fact, contradicted her," the report notes.

It also states that committee investigators "found no verifiable evidence" to support Deborah Ramirez's claim that Kavanaugh exposed himself to her at a party when they were both at Yale.

The report additionally dismisses allegations from Julie Swetnick, forwarded by lawyer Michael Avenatti.

"Indeed, the evidence appears to support the position that Julie Swetnick and Mr. Avenatti criminally conspired to make materially false statements to the Committee and obstruct the Committee's investigation," the report writes.

Avenatti and Swetnick have both been referred to the Department of Justice for potential criminal investigations into their behavior during Kavanaugh's confirmation process. Avenatti was referred a second time for his actions.

In addition, the report details that investigators were also unable to locate supporting evidence for the several anonymous accusations against Kavanaugh, noting that one of the accusers has been referred for a criminal investigation.

Kavanaugh passionately denied all of the allegations against him and was ultimately confirmed after a brutal confirmation fight on Oct. 7 by a vote largely down party lines.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...port-accusations-against-kavanaugh/ar-BBPkcRU
It didn't work and now they have moved on to the next batch of lies.
 
Anyone surprised?


Senate Judiciary panel says no evidence found to support accusations against Kavanaugh


The Senate Judiciary Committee late Saturday released a 414-page report, in which the panel members say they found no supporting evidence for any of the allegations of sexual misconduct made against Justice Brett Kavanaugh ahead of his confirmation.

"Committee investigators spoke with 45 individuals and took 25 written statements relating to the various allegations made in the course of the #SCOTUS confirmation process," the Senate Judiciary Committee tweeted Saturday.

"In neither the committee's investigation nor in the supplemental background investigation conducted by the FBI was there ANY evidence to substantiate or corroborate any of the allegations."

The committee investigators "found no verifiable evidence that supported" Christine Blasey Ford's allegation that Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed in the early 1980s and attempted to remove her clothes while covering her mouth with one hand.

"The witnesses that Dr. Ford identified as individuals who could corroborate her allegations failed to do so, and in fact, contradicted her," the report notes.

It also states that committee investigators "found no verifiable evidence" to support Deborah Ramirez's claim that Kavanaugh exposed himself to her at a party when they were both at Yale.

The report additionally dismisses allegations from Julie Swetnick, forwarded by lawyer Michael Avenatti.

"Indeed, the evidence appears to support the position that Julie Swetnick and Mr. Avenatti criminally conspired to make materially false statements to the Committee and obstruct the Committee's investigation," the report writes.

Avenatti and Swetnick have both been referred to the Department of Justice for potential criminal investigations into their behavior during Kavanaugh's confirmation process. Avenatti was referred a second time for his actions.

In addition, the report details that investigators were also unable to locate supporting evidence for the several anonymous accusations against Kavanaugh, noting that one of the accusers has been referred for a criminal investigation.

Kavanaugh passionately denied all of the allegations against him and was ultimately confirmed after a brutal confirmation fight on Oct. 7 by a vote largely down party lines.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...port-accusations-against-kavanaugh/ar-BBPkcRU
Nope.
Nobody surprised.
Just crickets from the usual suspects.
 
DrQMgMbUUAA-rSB.jpg
 
LOL !!!

If you want to keep protecting the criminal in the White House -- Vote Republican! If you want full and fair investigations into the corruption in the White House - VOTE DEMOCRATIC!

Let me help your cause.


Your effort is akin to a Chihuahua pissin on a weed.....


VOTE REPUBLICAN NOV 6th AND THE FISHSMELL WILL GO AWAY !

shopping
 
bd96cd9728572900b20033b03a7f5d3d


There might be one thing that Brian Kemp loves more than trying to stop black people from voting: his guns. And pointing his guns at people in campaign ads. And guns in general! In fact, while rallying for Kemp last weekend, Donald Trump said that if Democratic opponent Stacey Abrams becomes governor, she would somehow throw out the Second Amendment and confiscate guns in Georgia.

But Kemp pulled a stunning about-face on Monday when he declared that walking around with guns is "too extreme." He was motivated by a Breitbart article about a viral photo showing members of the New Black Panther Party (confirmed by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution) holding rifles and a pro-Stacey Abrams sign.

Kemp wasn't alone. Noted reasonable person David Clarke has said that the photo is voter intimidation, somehow, and Laura Ingraham, who formerly lost a slough of advertisers after making fun of high school shooting survivors, also decided that open-carrying guns was now cause for concern.

It would be easy to call the conservative messaging on this—claiming that gun control is bad unless the gun-owners are black—schizophrenic. But that would be dishonest. Kemp and his cheerleaders are being extremely consistent here: Like voting, gun rights only apply to white people.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/conservatives-suddenly-decide-guns-bad-165938363.html
 
bd96cd9728572900b20033b03a7f5d3d


There might be one thing that Brian Kemp loves more than trying to stop black people from voting: his guns. And pointing his guns at people in campaign ads. And guns in general! In fact, while rallying for Kemp last weekend, Donald Trump said that if Democratic opponent Stacey Abrams becomes governor, she would somehow throw out the Second Amendment and confiscate guns in Georgia.

But Kemp pulled a stunning about-face on Monday when he declared that walking around with guns is "too extreme." He was motivated by a Breitbart article about a viral photo showing members of the New Black Panther Party (confirmed by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution) holding rifles and a pro-Stacey Abrams sign.

Kemp wasn't alone. Noted reasonable person David Clarke has said that the photo is voter intimidation, somehow, and Laura Ingraham, who formerly lost a slough of advertisers after making fun of high school shooting survivors, also decided that open-carrying guns was now cause for concern.

It would be easy to call the conservative messaging on this—claiming that gun control is bad unless the gun-owners are black—schizophrenic. But that would be dishonest. Kemp and his cheerleaders are being extremely consistent here: Like voting, gun rights only apply to white people.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/conservatives-suddenly-decide-guns-bad-165938363.html


Which one is Kemp !

nbpp.jpg
 
Back
Top