Climate and Weather


Greenpeace’s Iconic ‘Rainbow Warrior’ Ship Chopped Up On A Third-World Beach, Sold For Scrap
December 30th, 2018
RTR9OTR-e1546209228894.jpg

The Greenpeace ship Rainbow Warrior leads a peaceful protest against a cargo of rejected plutonium fuel currently on route from Japan to Sellafield in the north of Britain, in Dublin Bay, Republic of Ireland September 1, 2002. The plutonium ships, Pacific Pintail and the Pacific Teal, are currently mid-south Atlantic and are expected to enter European waters in the first week of September. REUTERS/Paul McErlane.

  • Greenpeace’s iconic “Rainbow Warrior” boat was disposed of in a way the group campaigned against for years.
  • Greenpeace regrets allowing its old vessel to be chopped up on a Bangladeshi beaching yard and sold for scrap.
  • The embarrassing news flew under the radar of major media outlets for weeks.

Greenpeace quietly admitted in November one of its “Rainbow Warrior” boats was “scrapped on a beaching yard in Bangladesh” — a method it spent years campaigning against.

“We have made a mistake, one that we have tried to correct,” Greenpeace International, based in Amsterdam, admitted in mid-November, adding it allowed Rainbow Warrior II “to be scrapped on a beaching yard in Bangladesh, in a way that does not live up to the standards we set ourselves and campaigned with our allies to have adopted across the world.”
 
Despite increasingly apocalyptic warnings from U.N. officials, 2018 has seen a number of high-profile defeats for policies aimed at fighting global warming. Politicians and voters pushed back at attempts to raise energy prices as part of the climate crusade.

It started in June with election of Ontario Premier Doug Ford. Ontario residents overwhelmingly voted Ford’s conservative coalition into power on a platform that included axing the Canadian province’s cap-and-trade program.

Ford said his first priority upon taking office would be to “cancel the Liberal cap-and-trade carbon tax.” Ford then joined a legal challenge led by Saskatchewan against Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s policy of a central government-imposed carbon tax on provinces that don’t have their own.

Carbon tax opponents called Trudeau’s plan an attempt to “use the new tax to further redistribute income, which will increase the costs of this tax to the economy.”
 
NANCY PELOSI ANNOUNCES PLANS FOR A HOUSE ‘CLIMATE CRISIS’ COMMITTEE AFTER FLYING THOUSANDS OF MILES TO A HAWAIIAN RESORT


https://dailycaller.com/2018/12/28/...ush&utm_source=daily_caller&utm_campaign=push
  • California Democratic Rep. Nancy Pelosi announced the creation of a House “climate crisis” committee.
  • Already far-left Democrats are expressing their discontent with Pelosi’s plan.
  • Pelosi announced the “climate crisis” committee after flying thousands of miles to Hawaii.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi announced Friday that Democrats would create a Select Committee on the Climate Crisis in 2019, which will be headed by Florida Democratic Rep. Kathy Castor.

However, Pelosi’s announcement isn’t placating progressives in her party, such as New York Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who support “Green New Deal” legislation.

“This committee, if it turns out that the rumors about it are true, sound about as useful as a screen door on a submarine,” Ocasio-Cortez spokesman Corbin Trent, told The Hill.

“As it’s portrayed it’s going to be completely incapable of solving the greatest threat to human kind,” Trent said.
 
And you know what else? Major universities are refusing to permit flat earth believers from teaching in their science departments. This commie lib stuff is getting out of hands. The idiots need a say!

Do you ever think before you post......

Take a break, your " New " semester is coming up.....
 
And you know what else? Major universities are refusing to permit flat earth believers from teaching in their science departments. This commie lib stuff is getting out of hands. The idiots need a say!
You can cite a source for your proclamation regarding these major universities....?
Way to step up for the idiots that need a say.
 
JANUARY 6, 2019
California's El nino storms: worse than wildfires?
By Chriss Street
California is being slammed by an El Niño storm train packing heavy rains and mountain snow that could generate massive flooding that could be more dangerous than wildfires.

Like rail freight cars slowly moving down a track at increasing speed, AccuWeather is forecasting that over five days, California will receive two to five-inch rainfall across lowlands and at least three feet of snow in the Sierra Nevada Mountains.

California suffered about 9,000 fires wildfires in 2017 and in 2018, which was somewhat below the state’s average. But the 1.5 million acres and 10,000 structures that were destroyed each year was substantially above prior periods. With a record $14 billion of California wildfire insurance losses recorded in 2017, catastrophe modeler Risk Management Solutions estimates 2018 wildfire insurance losses of another $13 billion.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is predicting a 90 percent chance of an El Niño cyclical condition this Winter and 60 percent risk for Spring. Known for torrential rains and mass flooding, a 2016 January and February El Niño storm train, destroyed 22,500 structures and caused the worst beach erosion in 145 years.

211340_5_.png
California uses disinformation and every sleight-of-hand trick to justify drastically underfunding infrastructure spending to prevent a state insolvency. Despite horrific El Nino flooding in 2016, it is still California state policy that climate-change models unanimously project a growing risk of “mega-droughts” lasting for decades.

The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) awards California its booby prize as the worst state in the nation with $65 billion infrastructure investment deficit involving dams, waterways, airports, roads, bridges, seaports, and tunnel maintenance.


Despite ASCE’s “Infrastructure Report Card” awarding a “D” grade in 2013 for levees and flood control as California’s most neglected sector, the state failed to raise spending on dams. California did convince voters in 2014 to approve a $7.5 billion water bond that was advertised as funding five major dams. But this writer warned that Prop 1 was a “bait and switch” ruse to siphon off 75 percent of the proceeds for fish ecosystems.

When a similar El Nino storm train slammed into California in early 2017 and washed-away the 800-foot high Oroville Dam spillway, 220,000 people had to evacuate over the risk of imminent death from the collapse of America’s largest earthen dam. The 584-page Federal analysis of the near disaster found the state’s 1960s structure was poorly designed and that public risks were “exacerbated by inadequate repairs”

A Pacific Ocean high pressure ridge delayed the storm train from coming on shore, but AccuWeather is now warning that damage in Northern California from the low pressure storm system will be magnified by strong winds with frequent 40-60 mph gusts. As the storm saturates the ground, surging winds could increase risk of broad power outages.

California has been able to transfer much of the costs from its failure to build infrastructure onto American taxpayers by convincing presidents to declare damage the result of reimbursable national disasters. But President Trump threatened in November, at the height of the latest wildfires, to pull billions of dollars of federal payments if nothing is done by California to "remedy" the “gross mismanagement of the forests.”

Although the President eventually relented and declared California wildfires a national disaster, Trump shined a light on the fact that the federal government provides about 36 percent of State of all California spending, or over $100 billion in 2018.
 


Climate Change, Racial Justice and Some Inconvenient Truths

Posted at 9:36 am on January 13, 2019 by davenj1








ap-climate-protest-300x208.jpg


(AP Photo/Thibault Camus)

Back in December, the Democratic darling du jour- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez- in reference to her vaunted Green New Deal pie-in-the-sky said it was the next way to “establish economic, social, and racial justice in the United States of America.” Thenjiwe Harris of the Movement for Black Lives at the “People’s Climate March” in January 2018 had this observation: There is no climate justice without racial justice.As early as 2016, Greenpeace declared Racial and environmental justice are fundamentally linked.” These are great tag lines and slogans to link climate change to another thing near and dear to the wealth redistribution purveyors- racial justice.





However, this view runs into a brick wall when certain facts enter the equation. Let us, for the sake of argument, assume that climate change is real and that it is manmade. Mankind consists NOT just of the corporate white capitalists who seem to the bear the brunt of the Left’s rhetoric when it comes to climate change. Targeting the West (the developed world) will accomplish nothing IF their real concern is climate change.

For example, in 2012 (and it has gotten worse since) China’s carbon emissions exceeded those of the United States AND the European Union combined! The bulk of China’s energy needs comes from coal. When they are not developing coal power plants domestically, they are building them throughout Africa. When you throw in two other growing countries in terms of both population and their economies- Vietnam and India- the problem is made even worse.





By 2015, it was estimated by the Center for Global Development that 63% of the world’s carbon emissions were caused by non-developed nations, all of whom are non-white and many of whom are not capitalist. That percentage is likely to increase in the coming decades. State-driven industrialization- NOT white corporate capitalism- is driving the increase in carbon emissions. It is not just carbon emissions, but pollution in general. The World Economic Forum has determined that 90% of the plastic in the ocean originates in just ten rivers- eight in Asia and two in Africa- both hardly bastions of white capitalism.
 


Climate Change, Racial Justice and Some Inconvenient Truths

Posted at 9:36 am on January 13, 2019 by davenj1








ap-climate-protest-300x208.jpg


(AP Photo/Thibault Camus)

Back in December, the Democratic darling du jour- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez- in reference to her vaunted Green New Deal pie-in-the-sky said it was the next way to “establish economic, social, and racial justice in the United States of America.” Thenjiwe Harris of the Movement for Black Lives at the “People’s Climate March” in January 2018 had this observation: There is no climate justice without racial justice.As early as 2016, Greenpeace declared Racial and environmental justice are fundamentally linked.” These are great tag lines and slogans to link climate change to another thing near and dear to the wealth redistribution purveyors- racial justice.





However, this view runs into a brick wall when certain facts enter the equation. Let us, for the sake of argument, assume that climate change is real and that it is manmade. Mankind consists NOT just of the corporate white capitalists who seem to the bear the brunt of the Left’s rhetoric when it comes to climate change. Targeting the West (the developed world) will accomplish nothing IF their real concern is climate change.

For example, in 2012 (and it has gotten worse since) China’s carbon emissions exceeded those of the United States AND the European Union combined! The bulk of China’s energy needs comes from coal. When they are not developing coal power plants domestically, they are building them throughout Africa. When you throw in two other growing countries in terms of both population and their economies- Vietnam and India- the problem is made even worse.





By 2015, it was estimated by the Center for Global Development that 63% of the world’s carbon emissions were caused by non-developed nations, all of whom are non-white and many of whom are not capitalist. That percentage is likely to increase in the coming decades. State-driven industrialization- NOT white corporate capitalism- is driving the increase in carbon emissions. It is not just carbon emissions, but pollution in general. The World Economic Forum has determined that 90% of the plastic in the ocean originates in just ten rivers- eight in Asia and two in Africa- both hardly bastions of white capitalism.

Do you agree with the implication of this article that carbon emissions are the primary cause of global climate change?
 
Back
Top