17-18 boys applications

I would also venture that there is little interest from the MLS academies to add additional non-MLS DA teams to the mix, and I would guess that the MLS academies have a lot of say in who gets added and who doesn't.

"With due respect, playing against youth clubs with no pro team (i.e. amateur clubs) does us [LA Galaxy Academy] no good. It’s too easy. Pound for pound, not only is our roster superior, but the entire development environment from proper training, to facilities, to incentives, make the team too good to play against the amateur sides."

http://blog.3four3.com/2016/08/24/xolos-galaxy-u16-possession-soccer-development-environment/

I don't disagree at all with you. I think it is clear MLS teams with DA have a clear step up in terms of caliber. My only argument is that not everyone has access to MLS DA teams. Therefore, there is a market for players who could play at MLS DA teams, but can't for whatever logistical reason. MLS DA teams are not accessible to everyone just due to geography...

On your list there are a lot of non-MLS teams above LAG. So does that make playing against non-MLS teams not challenging enough?

good article though!
 
I have a lot of respect for Galaxy organization, but way more for FC Dallas Academy that truly dominates the DA in the last few years and developed youth players into pros. Galaxy still has a way to go with their U17/18 that ranks 8 of 9 in the Southwest Division currently.

Agree, FC Dallas is probably the gold standard for academies in the US at this point.

It is an interesting question as to why LAG is doing so poorly at the 17/18 age group. Reasons I can think of:

- The best 17/18s in the LAG system are playing for Los Dos and not the academy team
- Parents might not want to commit to the high school
- Their coaches suck (the 3four3 coaches Distraction quoted tend to work with younger teams...and agree...interesting read)
- This particular age group has a group of kids more focused on college than pro

I don't know if any of these are the case. Just brainstorming.

But, if a player is truly high enough quality to go pro, I cannot think of a good reason to play for a club other than LAG (and LAFC in the future) and miss out on the advantages of a homegrown contract.
 
Agree, FC Dallas is probably the gold standard for academies in the US at this point.

It is an interesting question as to why LAG is doing so poorly at the 17/18 age group. Reasons I can think of:

- The best 17/18s in the LAG system are playing for Los Dos and not the academy team
- Parents might not want to commit to the high school
- Their coaches suck (the 3four3 coaches Distraction quoted tend to work with younger teams...and agree...interesting read)
- This particular age group has a group of kids more focused on college than pro

I don't know if any of these are the case. Just brainstorming.

But, if a player is truly high enough quality to go pro, I cannot think of a good reason to play for a club other than LAG (and LAFC in the future) and miss out on the advantages of a homegrown contract.

Pretty good reasoning, (maybe not the coaching part) most of the exceptional players by this age have a bunch of options and DA is sometimes not their primary focus any longer.

I would say same goes for the 17/18 team, doesn't seem to get as much attention or focus as the others for LAG for whatever reasons. I'm pretty sure they could stack a U17/18 team if they wanted to, notice the roster for this team is short compared to the others, two of the best have moved on, and there are very few outside recruits if at all.

The http://blog.3four3.com/2016/08/24/xolos-galaxy-u16-possession-soccer-development-environment/ article hit's the nail on the head.

"If we want MLS franchises to have more and better competition, we must enable others to compete with them.

How? You open the soccer economy to all clubs. For those of you who aren’t aware, that means opening the pyramid (aka promotion & relegation at the pro level).

When you open the pyramid, there is more competition for MLS franchises.
They will no longer have a monopoly on their geographic player pool.
They will no longer be the only ones with an incentive to develop professionals

Opening the pyramid provides a real business case for existing lower division pro clubs to take player development serious. Currently most don’t even have youth teams, let alone take it serious. So of course MLS academies aren’t being challenged.

It also provides historically youth-only clubs a real business case for launching their own first teams. That, in turn, obviously stimulates them to take player development seriously.

It mobilizes investors & capital currently locked out of MLS to flow into lower division clubs, which as mentioned above, would now have a strong incentive to develop and field far more serious youth sides.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is how top performing ecosystems work

It’s called an open economic market. Open markets create fierce competition".
 
The huge issue is the lack of an open market and Id argue that some clubs want it to be a limited market because its not about developing players but about the $$$. Do not tell me Strikers and Pats can't afford to make the DA free but they are filling their purses instead- So OC and SD kids have to travel great distances to be trained by a real academy team. Only LAG,LAFC and LAFA have their DA's free of charge and that is an issue geographically as pointed out earlier. Its comedy that they don't allow their DA teams to play teams outside the DA. Id argue that several none DA teams are better than most of the current teams within the DA. At the 03 age group CDA Slammers, West Coast, Oxnard, Valley United would beat most of the DA teams and Slammers and West Coast have in the rare tournament that the DA teams managed to play.

Id also like to point out that so few are cut out for the professional ranks, the money is not there by a long shot so Id rather have my kids shoot for a scholarship to a university than give up everything to play in a professional system where they are making on average $22,000 a year in Los Dos
 
Opening up the pyramid and moving towards real regulation & promotion is something sorely needed.

DA's aim is to be more player focus rather than team. Longer term game-centric approach. Spend more time training to improve individuals. Normal clubs teams care more about how well the teams are doing as a whole.

DA is looking to place players in the national team pools, players can be on a bottom of the table team but still get recognized. Over the teams record many clubs consider player placement more important than team results.

Comparing DA to regular amateur club teams is a bit like Apple to Oranges because often they have different goals or mandates. Winning league, tournments, whos best is not a big concern but player progress is for the DA league. The playing field is not level, DA and MLS are looking for those few individual spectacular players and don't care as much about team results or what team you play for.
 
Agree, FC Dallas is probably the gold standard for academies in the US at this point.

It is an interesting question as to why LAG is doing so poorly at the 17/18 age group. Reasons I can think of:

- The best 17/18s in the LAG system are playing for Los Dos and not the academy team

This is probably the reason. If you are 17-18 and you are not on at least Galaxy 2, you are probably not pro caliber. There are exceptions. I think Zardes went to college and then joined Galaxy, but Zardes is really the exception, not the rule. There are many doors that open up for players with skill, can dunk a b-ball, and run like an NFL WR.

If you are not as physically talented, you probably have to be good enough to at least get rostered in an MLS second team by 18 or the doors of opportunity slam shut.
 
Slammers Irvine will officially be L.A Galaxy OC in the 17-18 season and beyond. Anyone know if they will produce their own DA? Like the SD connection.
 
Slammers Irvine will officially be L.A Galaxy OC in the 17-18 season and beyond. Anyone know if they will produce their own DA? Like the SD connection.

They can apply like any club but would be a longshot for acceptance

LA Galaxy Academy is a separate entity, they will take players from anywhere and you don't necessarily have a advantage playing for a affiliate unless your coach moves over.

Carlsbad (turned into Galaxy SD) is a special case in the womens da who where accepted before LA Galaxy applied and are 75 miles away so don't count on any more affiliates getting in unless they meet the 7 criteria.
 
The U.S. Soccer Development Academy application for 2017-18 is now closed.

Record number of applications submitted: which new clubs will get approved?

Existing ones with priority to expand I was told so look for most with the 3 teams to get 5. 1 to 3 is much bigger numbers so will have to see. Unless MLS 1 to 5 not likely.

  • January 23, 2017 - Application Decisions Announced
  • February 6, 2017 - New Clubs Confirm Participation
 
The U.S. Soccer Development Academy application for 2017-18 is now closed.

Record number of applications submitted: which new clubs will get approved?

Existing ones with priority to expand I was told so look for most with the 3 teams to get 5. 1 to 3 is much bigger numbers so will have to see. Unless MLS 1 to 5 not likely.

  • January 23, 2017 - Application Decisions Announced
  • February 6, 2017 - New Clubs Confirm Participation

How do you know a record number of applications were submitted? Is there a list somewhere of those that applied?
 
Opening up the pyramid and moving towards real regulation & promotion is something sorely needed.

DA's aim is to be more player focus rather than team. Longer term game-centric approach. Spend more time training to improve individuals. Normal clubs teams care more about how well the teams are doing as a whole.

DA is looking to place players in the national team pools, players can be on a bottom of the table team but still get recognized. Over the teams record many clubs consider player placement more important than team results.

Comparing DA to regular amateur club teams is a bit like Apple to Oranges because often they have different goals or mandates. Winning league, tournments, whos best is not a big concern but player progress is for the DA league. The playing field is not level, DA and MLS are looking for those few individual spectacular players and don't care as much about team results or what team you play for.

You're kidding yourself. DA is just another league. You may have an advantage playing for a "real" MLS club, not the "fake" affiliates, but all in all DA is just another league, no better no worse. More sugar for my Kool-Aid!
 
How do you know a record number of applications were submitted? Is there a list somewhere of those that applied?

Yes over 200 applications this year, no the list is not public.

There are 134 clubs across the country currently participating in the DA league. More will be added for 17-18'.

The annocments to the clubs are going out tomorrow 1/10, by 2/6 they confirm participation and a public announcement on the ussda site will be posted shortly after that.

Arena Calls 32 Players, 10 Development Academy Alums for MNT January Camp
http://www.ussoccerda.com/20170105-...bruce-arena-calls-32-players-for-january-camp
 
Huh wonder why ussda decided to stick with the combined age groups for the olders?

Extending the league to U18/19 does give current U17/18's 99'S a chance to continue on with DA

u15 seems to be the age now where we see a drop in the number of teams in the in the league.

I would quess that unless you already have a 03' team (will be U15 in 17-19') or get full da, new or partial clubs might have a tough time getting into the U15 age group. With each region already having 12 03' teams may not be a lot of room for more?

The big question is what will LAFC apply for this time? and will they partner or go alone?

Please post up if you know of new clubs applying or any plans you have heard from your club(s).



U.S. SOCCER DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY INTRODUCES U-15 SINGLE AGE GROUP FOR 2017-2018 SEASON




Change to Pathway is Part of a Long-Term Plan for Improved Player Development;
Five Academy Clubs Receive Promotion into U-15 Age Group, Joining 73 Current Academies




CHICAGO (Jan. 9, 2017) - As part of an overall goal to improve the player development pathway for elite boys soccer players, the U.S. Soccer Development Academy is adding a U-15 single age group for the 2017-2018 season. The strategic move to expand the pathway is part of a long-term plan for player development, and will provide Academy clubs with the opportunity to enhance their efforts to develop world-class players.

"The addition of the U-15 age group is another important step to ensure players have the opportunities they need to develop on and off the field," U.S. Soccer Development Academy Director Jared Micklos said. "We have all seen the benefits of the increased opportunities this season with the split of last season's U-13/14 division into single U-13 and U-14 age groups. We believe the U-15 age group will be another avenue for clubs to further their player development efforts."

At the beginning of the current 2016-2017 Development Academy Season, the move to split the previously combined U-13/14 age group to single ages (U-13 and U-14) made a significant improvement in the player development pathway by increasing the overall number of players, teams, clubs and games. With the addition of a single birth year U-15 age group, the pool of elite players will expand further, adding approximately 1,500 players to Academy clubs and raising the total number of Academy players across all age groups to more than 12,000.

The change to a U-15 single age group is in coordination with the birth year mandate that will go into effect at the beginning of the 2017-2018 season. The Academy will continue to register players by birth year and all of the six age groups featured in 2017-18 will provide a continuous pathway for players from Zone 1 (age 6-11), through Zone 2 (age 12-17), and into Zone 3 (age 18 and above). Having single age groups throughout the foundational ages (U-12 through U-15) creates a player pathway with no gaps in maturity. This further allows Academy coaches and technical staff to mitigate relative age effect and gives an additional ability to play younger players up when they are ready.

The goals of the new U-15 single age group will continue to be aligned with U.S. Soccer Development Academy objectives, which include more training, playing fewer total games, but more meaningful games, having age-appropriate travel and competition, reducing costs, paving a consistent development pathway, and playing under a simplified calendar that allows clubs to plan for elite level international and domestic events. Overall, developing players starts with coaching. The addition of U-15 age group will provide players with coaches that meet the minimum U.S. Soccer B license standard and create a positive learning environment focused on individual development within the team concept.

"Over time, we have closely monitored the Development Academy combined groups to assess the impact on talent identification and development, especially at the ages during early adolescence where there can be significant physical differences, based on an individual's maturation rate," said Director of Scouting Tony Lepore. "From looking at the data and speaking with our Technical Advisors and club directors, we know that adding U-15 single age group to the program will not only expand the influence and player pool, but it will also help clubs streamline the learning environment and allow individual players to follow their own pathway. The expansion to U-15 single age will really help to provide a place for individuals born later in the year or talented late developers, similar to what we have seen with the addition of the DA U-13 single age group this season."

The change will see five clubs rewarded with promotion of a team into the U-15 expansion age group:

Albion SC - San Diego, Calif.
Armada FC Pro Academy - Jacksonville, Fla.
Ballistic United SC - Pleasanton, Calif.
Cedar Stars Academy - Carlstadt, N.J.
New York Soccer Club - Chappaqua, N.Y.
Virginia Development Academy - Woodbridge, Va.
 
The U.S. Soccer Development Academy application for 2017-18 is now closed.

Record number of applications submitted: which new clubs will get approved?

Existing ones with priority to expand I was told so look for most with the 3 teams to get 5. 1 to 3 is much bigger numbers so will have to see. Unless MLS 1 to 5 not likely.

  • January 23, 2017 - Application Decisions Announced
  • February 6, 2017 - New Clubs Confirm Participation
Any early news on club acceptance into Developmental Academy? ....
 
Any early news on club acceptance into Developmental Academy? ....

Ask your club next Tuesday 1/24 , the Application Decisions are going out this week and should filter down by next Monday, Should be posted on the ussda site 1st week in February after those clubs confirm acceptance.
 
Ask your club next Tuesday 1/24 , the Application Decisions are going out this week and should filter down by next Monday, Should be posted on the ussda site 1st week in February after those clubs confirm acceptance.
Monday 1/23.... I am curious to see if there is any information out there yet? I know it will eventually trickle down to SoCal but just checking in to see if anyone has updates.
 
Monday 1/23.... I am curious to see if there is any information out there yet? I know it will eventually trickle down to SoCal but just checking in to see if anyone has updates.

It sounds like a "decline" for most that applied.
 
Back
Top